Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Modeling Portfolio Risk Decomposition

ASecurity

Decomposes portfolio risk with factor attribution, idiosyncratic risk, and marginal contribution to risk analysis. Use when decomposing portfolio risk, attributing risk sources, or analyzing factor risk contribution.

22 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/20/2026
testinggotestingapisecurity

Works with

api

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/20/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add lev-os/agents --skill modeling-portfolio-risk-decomposition --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Modeling Portfolio Risk Decomposition?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Modeling Portfolio Risk Decomposition
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/lev-os-modeling-portfolio-risk-decomposition/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lev-os-modeling-portfolio-risk-decomposition)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: modeling-portfolio-risk-decomposition
description: Decomposes portfolio risk with factor attribution, idiosyncratic risk, and marginal contribution to risk analysis. Use when decomposing portfolio risk, attributing risk sources, or analyzing factor risk contribution.
tags:
  - modeling
  - quantitative-capital-strategies
  - risk
  - portfolio
metadata:
  author: casemark
  practice_areas:
    - Quantitative Investing
    - Systematic Strategies
    - Factor Investing
  document_types:
    - Financial Model
  skill_modes:
    - Modeling
    - Forecasting
---
# Modeling Portfolio Risk Decomposition

## When To Use

- Decomposing total portfolio variance into systematic (factor) and idiosyncratic (security-specific) components
- Attributing risk to individual factors (market, size, value, momentum, sector, rates, credit spread, etc.)
- Computing marginal contribution to risk (MCTR) and component contribution to risk (CCTR) for position-level decisions
- Evaluating whether portfolio risk budget aligns with intended factor tilts
- Preparing risk reports for investment committees, risk oversight, or investor communications
- Stress-testing factor exposure drift after rebalancing or new allocations

## Inputs To Gather

- **Position-level holdings**: Weights (w_i) for each security or asset in the portfolio
- **Factor exposure matrix (B)**: Security-level loadings on each factor (from regression, fundamental model, or vendor such as Barra/Axioma/Northfield)
- **Factor covariance matrix (F)**: Covariance among systematic factors over the chosen estimation window
- **Idiosyncratic variance matrix (D)**: Diagonal matrix of security-specific residual variances
- **Return series** (if estimating from scratch): Daily or monthly total returns for holdings and candidate factor proxies
- **Benchmark** (optional): Benchmark weights for active risk decomposition
- **Lookback window and frequency**: e.g., 252 trading days daily, 60 months monthly — confirm consistency with factor model vintage [VERIFY]

## Workflow

1. **Assemble the covariance structure**
   - Total portfolio covariance: V = B F Bᵀ + D
   - Confirm dimensions match (n securities × k factors)
   - If using a vendor model, verify the factor covariance vintage date matches the holdings date [VERIFY]

2. **Compute total portfolio variance**
   - σ²_p = wᵀ V w
   - Report as annualized volatility: σ_p = √(σ²_p × annualization scalar)
   - Typical annualization: ×252 for daily, ×12 for monthly returns

3. **Decompose into systematic and idiosyncratic**
   - Systematic variance: σ²_sys = wᵀ (B F Bᵀ) w
   - Idiosyncratic variance: σ²_idio = wᵀ D w
   - Report the ratio σ²_sys / σ²_p — well-diversified equity portfolios typically show 85–95% systematic; significantly lower values signal concentrated idiosyncratic bets

4. **Factor-level risk attribution**
   - Portfolio factor exposures: β_p = Bᵀ w (k × 1 vector)
   - Factor contribution to variance for factor j: β_p,j × Σ_k (F_jk × β_p,k)
   - Sum of all factor contributions should equal σ²_sys (use as a reconciliation check)
   - Rank factors by absolute contribution to identify dominant risk drivers

5. **Marginal contribution to risk (MCTR)**
   - MCTR_i = (V w)_i / σ_p — measures how a small increase in weight_i changes portfolio volatility
   - Component contribution to risk: CCTR_i = w_i × MCTR_i
   - Verify: Σ CCTR_i = σ_p (Euler decomposition identity)

6. **Active risk decomposition** (if benchmark provided)
   - Active weights: w_a = w_portfolio − w_benchmark
   - Tracking error: TE = √(w_aᵀ V w_a × annualization)
   - Decompose TE into factor-active and stock-specific-active components using the same B F Bᵀ + D split
   - Report active factor bets and their contribution to tracking error

7. **Sensitivity and stress analysis**
   - Shock individual factor returns (e.g., +/−1σ, +/−2σ) and recompute portfolio P&L impact
   - Test covariance regime shifts: substitute a crisis-period F (e.g., 2008, 2020 March) and recompute σ_p
   - Evaluate concentration: flag any single factor contributing >40% of total variance or any single name contributing >10% of CCTR

## Output

- **Risk summary table**: Total volatility, systematic vs. idiosyncratic split (absolute and percentage)
- **Factor attribution table**: Each factor's exposure, variance contribution, and percentage of total risk — sorted by magnitude
- **MCTR / CCTR table**: Per-position marginal and component contributions, highlighting top-10 risk contributors
- **Active risk panel** (if applicable): Tracking error, factor-active vs. stock-specific-active decomposition
- **Stress scenario results**: Portfolio impact under specified factor shocks and regime covariance matrices
- **Reconciliation checks**: Confirm variance decomposition sums match total; flag discrepancies >0.1%

## Quality Checks

- Factor contributions sum to systematic variance within rounding tolerance
- CCTR values sum to total portfolio volatility (Euler identity holds)
- No negative idiosyncratic variances (indicates data or model error)
- Lookback window is consistent across factor model, covariance estimation, and holdings snapshot [VERIFY]
- Factor model covers ≥90% of portfolio NAV by weight; flag uncovered positions and their assumed treatment (benchmark proxy, peer mapping, or exclusion)
- Cross-check volatility estimate against realized rolling volatility — deviations >30% warrant investigation
- If using third-party risk model, confirm model version and release date match intended analysis period [VERIFY]

Attribution

lev-oslev-os
View sourceMore from lev-os →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Screen Reader Testing

Practical guide to testing web applications with screen readers for comprehensive accessibility validation.

393431 votes

Python Testing

使用pytest、TDD方法、夹具、模拟、参数化和覆盖率要求的Python测试策略。

2456590 votes

Tdd Workflow

在编写新功能、修复错误或重构代码时使用此技能。强制执行测试驱动开发,包含单元测试、集成测试和端到端测试,覆盖率超过80%。

2456590 votes

Springboot Tdd

使用JUnit 5、Mockito、MockMvc、Testcontainers和JaCoCo进行Spring Boot的测试驱动开发。适用于添加功能、修复错误或重构时。

2456590 votes

Eval Harness

克劳德代码会话的正式评估框架,实施评估驱动开发(EDD)原则

2456590 votes
View all in testing →