Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Incident Report Summary

ASecurity

Generates structured, litigation-ready summaries from police reports, crash reports, workplace incident reports, or investigative documents. Extracts parties, narratives, citations, witnesses, contributing factors, and visual documentation into a standardized format. Use when summarizing an incident report for case assessment, discovery planning, or liability evaluation; trigger keywords: police report, accident report, crash report, incident summary, report summary, investigative report.

22 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/20/2026
researchgodocumentation

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/20/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add lev-os/agents --skill incident-report-summary --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Incident Report Summary?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Incident Report Summary
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/lev-os-incident-report-summary/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lev-os-incident-report-summary)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: incident-report-summary
description: >-
  Generates structured, litigation-ready summaries from police reports,
  crash reports, workplace incident reports, or investigative documents.
  Extracts parties, narratives, citations, witnesses, contributing factors,
  and visual documentation into a standardized format. Use when summarizing
  an incident report for case assessment, discovery planning, or liability
  evaluation; trigger keywords: police report, accident report, crash report,
  incident summary, report summary, investigative report.
tags:
  - litigation
  - summarization
---

# Incident Report Summary

Extracts a structured, self-sufficient summary from a police or incident report so an attorney can assess facts, parties, and issues without the original document.

## Prerequisites

1. Source report (police, crash, workplace, or investigative document).
2. All attachments — supplements, witness forms, diagrams, photos.
3. Matter identifier — case name or number.

## Quick Start

1. Identify report type and adapt extraction fields accordingly (e.g., skip vehicle info for workplace incidents).
2. Extract each section below in order.
3. Flag every gap, contradiction, or ambiguity.
4. Verify every fact traces to specific source language — no inference.

## Output Sections

Produce sections in the order listed.

### 1. Header

| Field | Extract |
|---|---|
| Report/Case Number | Official identifier |
| Incident Date/Time | Include time zone if available |
| Report Filed Date | If different from incident date |
| Location | Full address, intersection, or mile marker |
| Agency | Name, officer/investigator, badge number |
| Report Type | Collision, criminal, workplace, etc. |

### 2. Parties Involved

Per party, extract:

- **Role** — Driver / Passenger / Pedestrian / Victim / Suspect / Reporting Party / Employee
- **Name** — full legal name
- **DOB / Age**
- **Address**, **Contact** (phone, email)
- **ID** — license number + state, or employee ID
- **Vehicle** (if applicable) — year, make, model, color, VIN, plate
- **Insurance** (if applicable) — carrier, policy number
- **Injuries noted** — as described in report

### 3. Narrative Summary

Provide two versions:

- **Complete narrative** — preserve the officer/investigator's full account.
- **Key facts extract** — legally significant facts only:
  - Fault admissions
  - Impairment / recklessness / distraction observations
  - Physical evidence (skid marks, distances, measurements)
  - Injury descriptions
  - Safety equipment use or non-use
  - Environmental conditions

Flag ambiguities, contradictions, and temporal gaps.

### 4. Citations / Charges

| Person Cited | Statute/Code | Description | Issued At Scene? | Court Date | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|

### 5. Witnesses

Per witness:

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Name | Full name |
| Contact | Phone, address, email |
| Relationship | Independent or party-related |
| Location at incident | Position and facing direction |
| Statement summary | Key observations in their words |

- Preserve direct quotes verbatim (excited utterances / hearsay exceptions).
- Flag witnesses identified but not interviewed.
- Flag references to unidentified potential witnesses.

### 6. Contributing Factors

| Category | Examples | Evidence Source |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | Weather, lighting, road surface, visibility | Physical evidence / narrative |
| Human | Speed, inattention, impairment, fatigue | Witness / admission / observation |
| Equipment | Mechanical failure, defects | Inspection / narrative |
| Systemic | Training gaps, hazardous conditions | Report findings |

Flag factors suggesting:
- **Third-party liability** — road design defects, product defects, employer violations
- **Affirmative defenses** — comparative negligence, assumption of risk, intervening cause

### 7. Visual Documentation

Describe each diagram, sketch, or photo:

- **Collision diagrams** — road layout, lanes, traffic controls, vehicle positions (pre/during/post), point of impact, final rest, measurements.
- **Photos** — subject, perspective, visible damage/injuries, evidence markers.
- Note information in visuals absent from the narrative.

### 8. Gaps and Follow-Up

- [ ] Missing party contact information
- [ ] Uninterviewed or unidentified witnesses
- [ ] Narrative contradictions needing deposition clarification
- [ ] Missing supplemental reports referenced but not attached
- [ ] Unclear measurements or diagram elements
- [ ] Pending lab results, toxicology, or reconstruction reports

## Checks

- Every fact must trace to specific source language — no inference or speculation.
- Distinguish officer's direct observations from relayed information.
- Use consistent date (MM/DD/YYYY) and time format throughout.
- Adapt fields to report type — omit inapplicable sections.
- Protect PII not relevant to liability or damages.
- Use [VERIFY] on any uncertain extraction.

Attribution

lev-oslev-os
View sourceMore from lev-os →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...

452202 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

805541 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...

452201 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →