Produces structured U.S. transactional due diligence summaries with risk ratings, document citations, and follow-up actions. Triggers when the user requests a due diligence summary, diligence report, red-flag memo, or data room analysis for M&A, investment, or partnership transactions.
Scanned 9/20/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add lev-os/agents --skill due-diligence-summary --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Due Diligence Summary?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lev-os-due-diligence-summary)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: due-diligence-summary
description: Produces structured U.S. transactional due diligence summaries with risk ratings, document citations, and follow-up actions. Triggers when the user requests a due diligence summary, diligence report, red-flag memo, or data room analysis for M&A, investment, or partnership transactions.
tags:
- analysis
- corporate
- summarization
- transactional
---
# Due Diligence Summary
Decision-ready diligence summary with risk ratings, evidence citations, and next-step actions for U.S. transactional matters.
## Quick Start
Gather before beginning:
1. **Transaction snapshot** — type, parties, structure, timeline, target entities
2. **Scope definition** — in/out-of-scope categories, materiality threshold, jurisdictions
3. **Data room index** — document list with stable IDs and dates
4. **Substantive materials** — governance docs, financials, contracts, IP schedules, litigation files, HR/benefits, real estate, tax, environmental records
5. **Privilege/confidentiality designation** and allowed audience
## Workflow
1. **Map scope to inventory** — mark each category Complete / Partial / Missing using the coverage checklist.
2. **Extract findings** — facts, obligations, restrictions, change-of-control and consent triggers.
3. **Classify** each finding as Fact, Representation, or Open Issue.
4. **Rate risk and materiality** — quantify exposure where possible.
5. **Flag conflicts** across sources; resolve by authority and date.
6. **Produce summary** using the deliverable template; cite every material finding as `[Doc ID or Title, date, page/section]`.
### Risk Scale
| Rating | Meaning | Action |
|--------|---------|--------|
| High | Likely deal impact or material exposure | Escalate; require resolution/mitigation |
| Medium | Manageable; needs diligence or contractual protection | Track; address in docs/price |
| Low | Informational or minor exposure | Note; monitor if cumulative |
### Coverage Checklist
| Category | Expected Core Docs |
|----------|--------------------|
| Corporate/Governance | Charter, bylaws, consents, cap table, subsidiary org |
| Financials/Debt | Audited/unaudited FS, debt docs, guarantees, liens |
| Contracts | Top customer/vendor, assignment/consent, exclusivity |
| IP/Tech | IP schedule, licenses, OSS use, assignments |
| Litigation/Reg | Docket list, claims history, agency letters |
| HR/Benefits | Payroll, key employee agreements, benefits plans |
| Real Estate/Assets | Leases, deeds, asset schedules |
| Tax | Returns, audits, NOLs, nexus |
| Environmental | Phase I/II, permits, compliance |
## Deliverable Template
### Executive Summary
- Deal snapshot (type, parties, target, valuation if known)
- Top 5 red flags with risk rating and cited evidence
- Missing critical items
### Scope & Coverage
- In-scope categories and jurisdictions
- Coverage checklist with gaps and rationale
### Key Findings by Category
One table per category (Corporate/Governance, Financials/Debt, Contracts, IP/Tech, Litigation/Regulatory, HR/Benefits, Real Estate/Assets, Tax, Environmental):
| Issue | Evidence | Risk | Materiality | Follow-up |
|-------|----------|------|-------------|-----------|
### Conflicts & Discrepancies
| Topic | Conflicting Sources | Assessment | Action |
|-------|---------------------|------------|--------|
### Open Items / Follow-Up Requests
| Item | Rationale | Requested From | Priority |
|------|-----------|----------------|----------|
### Recommended Actions
- Contractual protections (rep, warranty, indemnity, covenants)
- Price or structure adjustments
- Pre-closing conditions or consents
## Pitfalls & Checks
- Separate confirmed facts from representations and open issues — never conflate.
- Flag missing expected documents as findings with risk and impact.
- Use exact dates, parties, dollar amounts, and governing law when available.
- Label unsigned drafts as non-authoritative.
- For regulated industries, add a compliance subsection (HIPAA, FDA, FINRA/SEC, OFAC, FCPA, state licensing); mark statutes `[VERIFY]` if uncertain.
- Stay neutral and evidence-driven — do not advocate for or against the deal.
- Preserve privilege and confidentiality; limit distribution as instructed.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!