Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Counterclaim Crossclaim

ASecurity

Drafts court-ready counterclaims and crossclaims for commercial litigation. Analyzes case documents, classifies compulsory vs. permissive counterclaims, ensures procedural compliance with federal/state rules, and structures causes of action with proper element pleading. Use when a defendant must assert affirmative claims against the plaintiff or crossclaims against co-defendants during pleadings.

22 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/20/2026
researchperformance

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/20/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add lev-os/agents --skill counterclaim-crossclaim --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Counterclaim Crossclaim?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Counterclaim Crossclaim
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/lev-os-counterclaim-crossclaim/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lev-os-counterclaim-crossclaim)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: counterclaim-crossclaim
description: Drafts court-ready counterclaims and crossclaims for commercial litigation. Analyzes case documents, classifies compulsory vs. permissive counterclaims, ensures procedural compliance with federal/state rules, and structures causes of action with proper element pleading. Use when a defendant must assert affirmative claims against the plaintiff or crossclaims against co-defendants during pleadings.
---

# Counterclaim & Crossclaim

Drafts counterclaim and/or crossclaim pleadings asserting a defendant's affirmative claims against the plaintiff or co-defendants, satisfying procedural and substantive pleading requirements.

## Prerequisites

1. **Original complaint** — full text with caption, case number, court, filing date
2. **Case documents** — contracts, correspondence, invoices, emails, evidence
3. **Party information** — names, roles, addresses, relationships (including co-defendants for crossclaims)
4. **Jurisdictional details** — court, rules of civil procedure, local rules, formatting requirements
5. **Legal authority** — statutes, regulations, case law for each cause of action

## Quick Start

1. Extract case identifiers and build a chronological fact timeline from provided documents
2. Classify each potential claim as compulsory or permissive (FRCP 13(a)/(b) or state equivalent)
3. Run the procedural compliance checklist below
4. Assemble the pleading using the document structure
5. Verify all element requirements per the cause of action table

## Workflow

### Step 1: Document Review & Fact Extraction

| Task | Details |
|------|---------|
| Extract identifiers | Court, caption, case number, party designations |
| Build timeline | Formation → performance → breach → damages → plaintiff's wrongful conduct |
| Identify counterclaim targets | Same transaction/occurrence (compulsory) or related matters (permissive) |
| Identify crossclaim targets | Co-defendants liable under contribution, indemnification, or independent theories |
| Catalog damages | Specific amounts, dates, causation chain, continuing damages |

### Step 2: Procedural Compliance

- [ ] Compulsory vs. permissive status (FRCP 13(a)/(b) or state equivalent)
- [ ] Crossclaim from same transaction/occurrence (FRCP 13(g) or state equivalent)
- [ ] Statute of limitations for each cause of action
- [ ] Jurisdictional basis: supplemental for counterclaims; independent or supplemental for crossclaims
- [ ] Local rules: caption format, margins, font, spacing, page limits, e-filing
- [ ] Verification requirement (party vs. attorney)
- [ ] Heightened pleading (FRCP 9(b) for fraud: who, what, when, where, how)

### Step 3: Document Assembly

Structure the pleading with these sections in order:

**Caption** — Mirror original complaint; add Counterclaimant/Counter-Defendant/Cross-Claimant/Cross-Defendant designations; title "COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSSCLAIM" (or separate documents per local rules)

**Introductory Statement** — Filing party, capacity, authorizing rule (FRCP 13/state equivalent), compulsory/permissive nature; for crossclaims: co-defendant targets and legal basis

**Jurisdictional Allegations** — Subject matter jurisdiction, supplemental jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1367) `[VERIFY]`, amount in controversy, venue

**Parties** — Full identification with transaction roles; crossclaim defendants: describe liability-creating relationship

**Factual Allegations** (numbered paragraphs) — Incorporate admissions from complaint by reference; deny/qualify inaccurate allegations; present new facts chronologically; allege damages with specificity (nature, timing, causation, amount)

**Causes of Action** (separately numbered counts) — Format: "COUNT [N]: [Legal Theory] ([Counterclaim/Crossclaim] Against [Party])". Each count: incorporate factual paragraphs by reference, satisfy each element, cite controlling authority, include theory-specific allegations (fault percentage for contribution, indemnification clause for contractual indemnity)

**Prayer for Relief** — Compensatory damages, punitive damages (if authorized), injunctive/declaratory relief, attorney's fees (cite basis), pre/post-judgment interest, catch-all clause; separate subsections for counterclaim vs. crossclaim relief

**Verification** (if required) — Party declaration under penalty of perjury

**Signature Block** — Attorney name, bar number, firm, contact; "Attorney for Defendant/Counterclaimant/Cross-Claimant [Name]"

**Certificate of Service** — All parties/counsel, addresses, method, date

## Cause of Action Elements

| Claim | Required Elements |
|-------|-------------------|
| Breach of Contract | Formation → terms → performance → breach → causation → damages |
| Fraud | False statement → materiality → scienter → reliance → causation → damages (plead with particularity) |
| Contribution | Common liability → proportionate fault → right to apportion |
| Contractual Indemnity | Indemnification clause → triggering event → covered claims → notice |
| Common Law Indemnity | Special relationship → passive vs. active fault → right to shift liability |
| Unjust Enrichment | Benefit conferred → knowledge → inequity of retention |

## Pitfalls & Checks

- **Compulsory counterclaim waiver**: Failure to assert a compulsory counterclaim typically results in waiver — flag all potentially compulsory claims
- **Alternative pleading**: Permitted under FRCP 8(d)(2); label "in the alternative" without conceding primary theory
- **Relation back**: Counterclaims generally relate back to the original filing date for limitations, but verify jurisdiction-specific rules
- **Consistency**: Party names, dates, amounts, and contract references must match source documents exactly
- **Cross-references**: Verify all internal paragraph and exhibit references; ensure exhibit labels match text
- **All citations must be verified** — mark uncertain citations with `[VERIFY]`
- **Do not fabricate facts** — plead only from provided case documents

Attribution

lev-oslev-os
View sourceMore from lev-os →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...

452202 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

805541 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...

452201 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →