Skip to content
Back to skills

Arch Design

ASecurity

Design architecture docs for new features, refactors, or redesigns. Produces implementation-ready docs with complete file impact analysis.

  • 62 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added May 28, 2026
documentationgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned May 28, 2026

npx -y skills add leogodin217/leos_claude_starter --skill arch-design --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Arch Design?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Arch Design
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/leogodin217-arch-design/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/leogodin217-arch-design)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: arch-design
description: Design architecture docs for new features, refactors, or redesigns. Produces implementation-ready docs with complete file impact analysis.
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: [feature-name or issue path]
---

# Architecture Design

Design an architecture doc for a new feature, refactor, or redesign. Produces a doc in `docs/architecture/pending/` with complete file impact analysis.

## Inputs

The user provides one of:
- A feature name or concept (e.g., "behavior mutations")
- A path to an issue doc (e.g., `docs/issues/002-behavior-mutations.md`)
- A description of the problem to solve

## Process

### Checkpoint 1: Problem + Solution (wait for user approval)

1. **Load context:**
   - `docs/CAPABILITIES.md` — current capability status
   - `docs/architecture/README.md` — architecture overview + reading order
   - If user provided an issue path, read that too

2. **Write Problem and Solution sections:**
   - Problem: What's wrong or missing. Include a concrete example (config snippet, error, limitation).
   - Solution: High-level approach. One paragraph + diagram or YAML snippet.

3. **Present to user for approval.** Do not continue until they confirm the direction is right.

### Automated Phase (after direction is approved)

4. **Load relevant architecture docs** per README.md reading order for the area being designed.

5. **Read existing source code** that the design touches. Use Grep/Glob/find_references to locate all relevant files.

6. **Write remaining sections** using the template at `.claude/skills/arch-design/template.md`:
   - **Semantics** — behavioral rules, edge cases, ordering, timing
   - **Configuration** — YAML examples if the feature has educator-facing config
   - **Interface Contracts** — function signatures with full docstrings
   - **Validation Rules** — parse-time (Pydantic) and business rules
   - **Implementation Impact** — the key section (see below)
   - **What Doesn't Change** — explicit scope boundaries

7. **Build the Implementation Impact section:**
   - Use Grep to find every import of types/functions being moved or modified
   - Use find_references for symbols being renamed or relocated
   - Use Glob to find test files that cover affected modules
   - For each file: action (Create/Modify), path, one-line description of change
   - Separate into: Source Files, Test Files, Import Updates
   - The Import Updates table must show current import → new import for every file affected by moves/renames

8. **Write the complete doc** to `docs/architecture/pending/<name>.md`

9. **Present the full doc to user** with a summary of:
   - Total files affected (create/modify counts)
   - Import sites found
   - Any design decisions that could go either way (flag for user)

## Quality Rules

- **No invented scenario values** (Principle #7) — contracts must not introduce defaults for educator-specified parameters
- **No future scaffolding** (Principle #8) — design only what this feature needs, not extensibility for hypothetical future work
- **Breaking changes are fine** (Principle #9) — don't add compatibility shims
- **Complete import tracing** — every file that imports a moved/renamed symbol must appear in the Import Updates table. Use Grep for `from module import symbol` and `import module` patterns.
- **Concrete contracts** — every function signature includes Args, Returns, Raises. No `...` bodies in the doc; show the signature and docstring only.
- **Testable sections** — Semantics section should use tables (Condition | Result) so sprint specs can derive test cases directly.
- **No implementation code** — design docs contain signatures and docstrings, never implementation bodies. Describe behavior in prose and tables, not code blocks with for-loops or if-statements. Wrong: showing the literal code to insert into `processor.py`. Right: "After `execute_action()` returns non-empty decisions, apply mutations and record history if tracked."
- **No duplication with sprint specs** — the design doc provides rationale, semantics, and constraints (the WHY). The sprint spec provides contracts, phases, and test cases (the WHAT). If a sprint spec will be written from this design doc, the sprint planner extracts contracts from here — don't write content that forces the planner to duplicate or filter.

## Output Location

`docs/architecture/pending/<feature-name>.md`

The `pending/` directory holds designs that haven't been implemented yet. After sprint completion, move to `docs/architecture/` if the design becomes a permanent reference, or delete if it was consumed by the sprint spec.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB
  • template.md3.3 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.