Skip to content
Back to skills

Pair Process Plan Stories

ASecurity

Breaks epics into user stories using vertical slicing and INVEST validation. Composes /pair-capability-write-issue with $type: story. Idempotent: detects existing stories, creates only missing ones.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 7, 2026
businessgodocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned November 7, 2026

npx -y skills add learnn-com/designn --skill pair-process-plan-stories --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Pair Process Plan Stories?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Pair Process Plan Stories
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/learnn-com-pair-process-plan-stories/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/learnn-com-pair-process-plan-stories)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: pair-process-plan-stories
description: "Breaks epics into user stories using vertical slicing and INVEST validation. Composes /pair-capability-write-issue with $type: story. Idempotent: detects existing stories, creates only missing ones."
version: 0.4.1
author: Foomakers
---

# /pair-process-plan-stories — User Story Breakdown

Transform epics into user stories through vertical slicing, INVEST validation, and collaborative definition. Each story delivers end-to-end user value within a single sprint. Composes `/pair-capability-write-issue` for PM tool integration.

## Process Profile

<!-- process-step: id=plan-stories -->

Executable form of the **`plan-stories`** step. A **direct** invocation while a step is disabled by the project's profile warns and asks for confirmation; a **composed** one never prompts — it degrades exactly as a step that is not installed. No section ⇒ no-op. See [process-profile gate](../../../.pair/knowledge/guidelines/technical-standards/ai-development/skill-conventions/process-profile-gate.md).

## Composed Skills

| Skill          | Type       | Required                                                  |
| -------------- | ---------- | --------------------------------------------------------- |
| `/pair-capability-write-issue` | Capability | Yes — creates or updates story issues in the PM tool      |

## Arguments

| Argument | Required | Description                                                                                  |
| -------- | -------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `$epic`  | No       | Epic identifier (e.g., `#42`). If omitted, selects highest-priority Todo epic.               |

## Algorithm

### Step 0: Prerequisite Check

1. **Check**: Prerequisites present?
   - Bootstrap complete: [way-of-working.md](../../../.pair/adoption/tech/way-of-working.md)
   - Epics exist in PM tool
   - [User story template](../../../.pair/knowledge/guidelines/collaboration/templates/user-story-template.md) available
2. **Skip**: If all present, proceed to Step 1.
3. **Act**: If any missing → **HALT**:

   > Prerequisites incomplete: [list missing]. Epics must exist before story breakdown.

4. **Verify**: Context loaded, PM tool accessible.

### Step 1: Epic Selection

1. **Check**: Is `$epic` provided?
2. **Skip**: If provided, load the epic from the PM tool. Proceed to Step 2.
3. **Act**: Query PM tool for epics in Todo state. Apply selection:
   - **Priority**: P0 > P1 > P2.
   - **Bootstrap rule**: if Epic 0 exists and is Todo, it must be broken down first.
   - **Dependencies**: prefer epics whose dependencies are complete.
4. **Act**: Present recommendation and ask developer to confirm:

   > Recommend breaking down Epic `#[ID]: [Title]` (Priority: [P0/P1/P2]).
   > Reason: [business value / sprint urgency / dependency chain].
   > Proceed?

5. **Verify**: Epic selected and loaded.

### Step 2: Detect Existing Stories

1. **Check**: Query PM tool for existing story issues linked to the selected epic.
2. **Act**: Build a registry of existing stories:

   ```text
   EXISTING STORIES:
   ├── #ID: [Title] (Status: [Todo/Refined/In Progress/Done])
   └── ...
   ```

3. **Verify**: Registry built. Existing stories will be skipped during creation.

### Step 3: Story Identification

1. **Act**: Analyze epic components for story candidates:
   - **Workflow steps**: distinct user journey phases.
   - **CRUD operations**: create, read, update, delete patterns.
   - **Business rules**: different scenarios and conditions.
   - **User roles**: admin, member, guest variations.
2. **Act**: Apply vertical slicing — every story must deliver end-to-end user value with visible UI manifestation.
3. **Act**: Present story candidates to developer:

   > Story candidates for Epic `#[ID]: [Title]`:
   >
   > 1. [Story name] — [user value] — [UI manifestation]
   > 2. [Story name] — [user value] — [UI manifestation]
   > ...
   >
   > [N] already exist (will be skipped).
   > Approve or adjust?

4. **Verify**: Developer approves the candidate list.

### Step 4: Story Definition & INVEST Validation

For each approved story not already in the registry:

1. **Check**: Does this story already exist in the registry (Step 2)?
2. **Skip**: If exists → skip, report:

   > Story `[Title]` already exists (#ID). Skipping.

3. **Act**: Define story scope using the Initial Breakdown section of [user-story-template.md](../../../.pair/knowledge/guidelines/collaboration/templates/user-story-template.md):
   - Story statement (As a / I want / So that).
   - Rough scope boundaries with expected uncertainty.
   - Initial sizing: XS(1), S(2), M(3), L(5), XL(8).
   - UI value manifestation for sprint demo readiness.
4. **Act**: Validate against INVEST criteria:
   - **I**ndependent: can be planned separately.
   - **N**egotiable: focuses on user value, not implementation.
   - **V**aluable: clear benefit to user persona.
   - **E**stimable: scope clear enough for rough sizing.
   - **S**mall: fits within single sprint.
   - **T**estable: outcome can be verified.
5. **Act**: Compose `/pair-capability-write-issue` with:
   - `$type: story`
   - `$content`: the story definition
   - `$parent`: the epic identifier
6. **Verify**: Story created in PM tool. Record the ID.

### Step 5: Coverage Validation & Completion

1. **Act**: Validate epic coverage:
   - All epic scope areas addressed by stories.
   - No critical gaps in user value delivery.
   - Epic objectives achievable through story completion.
2. **Act**: Report completion:

   > Epic coverage: [X]% of scope addressed.
   > Stories ready for backlog prioritization and future refinement.

3. **Verify**: Coverage validated.

## Output Format

```text
STORIES COMPLETE:
├── Epic:     [#ID: Title]
├── Total:    [N stories]
├── Created:  [X new]
├── Skipped:  [Y existing]
├── Points:   [total estimated points]
├── INVEST:   [all validated]
├── PM Tool:  [adopted tool]
└── Next:     /pair-process-refine-story
```

## HALT Conditions

- **No epics in Todo state** (Step 1) — nothing to break down.
- **Epic not found** (Step 1) — invalid `$epic` identifier.
- **Bootstrap incomplete** (Step 0) — PM tool required.
- **Developer rejects candidates** (Step 3) — must resolve before creation.

## Graceful Degradation

- If `/pair-capability-write-issue` is not installed, warn and provide formatted story content for manual PM tool entry.
- If PM tool is not accessible, produce story documents and ask developer to create manually.
- If epic documentation is sparse, proceed with available context and flag gaps.

## Notes

- This skill **modifies PM tool state** — creates story issues linked to epics.
- Idempotent: re-invocation detects existing stories and skips them.
- Stories at breakdown stage are rough planning units — detailed requirements are added during `/pair-process-refine-story`.
- INVEST validation is mandatory — stories failing INVEST must be reworked before creation.
- After story creation, proceed to `/pair-process-refine-story` for detailed specification.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.