Prepare meeting briefs with SPICED discovery (WbD) and MEDDICC qualification (Andy Whyte) — account research, attendee profiles, question banks, scorecard gaps, and competitive context. Use before discovery calls, demos, executive meetings, or deal reviews. Triggers on: "meeting prep", "call prep", "discovery prep", "MEDDICC", "MEDDIC", "qualify this deal", "pre-call research", "discovery questions", "champion test", "economic buyer".
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add LeadMagic/gtm-skills --skill meeting-prep --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Meeting Prep?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/leadmagic-meeting-prep)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: meeting-prep
description: >-
Prepare meeting briefs with SPICED discovery (WbD) and MEDDICC qualification
(Andy Whyte) — account research, attendee profiles, question banks, scorecard
gaps, and competitive context. Use before discovery calls, demos, executive
meetings, or deal reviews. Triggers on: "meeting prep", "call prep",
"discovery prep", "MEDDICC", "MEDDIC", "qualify this deal", "pre-call research",
"discovery questions", "champion test", "economic buyer".
license: MIT
compatibility: Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Goose, Hermes, Jesse, Windsurf, Zed
metadata:
version: "1.1.0"
author: LeadMagic
category: sales-revops
tags: [meeting-prep, discovery, call-prep, spiced, meddicc, qualification]
related_skills: [pipeline-management, competitive-intel, objection-handling, demo-scripts, multi-thread-orchestration, roi-calculator]
frameworks:
- "Winning by Design — SPICED"
- "Keenan — Gap Selling"
- "Andy Whyte — MEDDICC Qualification"
- "Force Management — MEDDICC Methodology"
- "Huthwaite — SPIN Selling"
- "Gartner — Challenger Sale"
---
# Meeting Prep
## Overview
Win rates are decided before the call. This skill produces a one-page brief:
account snapshot, attendee profiles, tailored question banks, and — for active
deals — a MEDDICC gap analysis showing which dimensions still need evidence.
**SPICED** (Winning by Design) structures early discovery conversations.
**Gap Selling** (Keenan) deepens problem diagnosis — current state, future state, quantified gap, root cause, happy-ears guardrails.
**MEDDICC** (Andy Whyte) scores deal qualification with evidence. They do not
contradict — SPICED uncovers; MEDDICC scores. Both map to the same CRM fields
defined in `pipeline-management`.
## When to Use
- "Prep me for a call with [company]"
- "Discovery questions for [prospect]"
- "MEDDICC score this deal" or "what's missing on MEDDICC?"
- "Champion test — is this contact a real champion?"
- "Brief me before my demo / exec meeting"
- "Pre-call research for [account]"
For full sales process design, load `pipeline-management` first.
## Authoritative Foundations
- **Winning by Design — SPICED.** Situation, Pain, Impact, Critical Event,
Decision — progressive discovery in Connect and Discovery stages. Critical
Event is the urgency gate: no CE, no timeline.
- **Keenan — Gap Selling.** Problem Centric™ discovery: map Current State
(situation, problem, impact, root cause, emotions) → Future State → Gap.
Spend ~25% of cycle on diagnosis; build Problem Identification Chart before
calls. Anti-pattern: **happy ears** — validate impact, don't assume yes.
Full playbook → `references/keenan-gap-selling.md`.
- **Andy Whyte — MEDDICC (MEDDICC.com).** Seven dimensions scored 0/1/2 with
evidence: Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process,
Identify Pain, Champion, Competition. "Always Be Qualifying" — re-score after
every interaction. Champion must pass four tests before Proposal.
- **Force Management — MEDDICC Methodology.** Source framework for enterprise
qualification; Whyte's scorecard operationalizes it for deal inspection.
- **Huthwaite — SPIN.** Question flow for conversational discovery — complements
SPICED, does not replace it.
- **Challenger — Teach-Tailor-Take Control.** Lead with insight, not interrogation.
### SPICED + MEDDICC — how they work together
| Call Type | Lead With | Score With |
|---|---|---|
| First discovery | SPICED + Gap Selling (current state) | Light MEDDICC (note gaps) |
| Second+ meeting | SPICED gaps + Gap (future state) | Full MEDDICC scorecard |
| Pre-proposal / exec | Economic buyer prep | MEDDICC must be ≥10/14 |
| Deal review (internal) | — | MEDDICC evidence inspection |
## Step-by-Step Process
### Phase 1: Account Research (5 min)
- Company size, industry, revenue, headquarters
- Recent news (funding, hires, launches) — potential Critical Events
- Tech stack and pain signals
- Competitive landscape and status quo risk
### Phase 2: Attendee Research
Per attendee: role, tenure, priorities, LinkedIn activity, likely MEDDICC role
(Champion? Economic Buyer? Technical Buyer? Blocker?).
### Phase 3: SPICED Question Bank (Discovery Calls)
| SPICED | Question Examples |
|---|---|
| **S**ituation | "Walk me through how your team handles [process] today." |
| **P**ain | "What's the most frustrating part of that approach?" |
| **I**mpact | "What does that cost you annually — rough order of magnitude?" |
| **C**ritical Event | "Why is fixing this a priority now versus six months from now?" |
| **D**ecision | "If we find a fit, what does your evaluation process look like?" |
### Phase 4: MEDDICC Question Bank (Qualification Calls)
| Dimension | Question Examples | Confirmed When |
|---|---|---|
| **M**etrics | "How would you measure success 12 months after implementation?" | Baseline + target KPI documented |
| **E**conomic Buyer | "Who ultimately approves budget for initiatives like this?" | EB named; meeting scheduled or completed |
| **D**ecision Criteria | "What are the must-haves vs nice-to-haves in your evaluation?" | Criteria list documented |
| **D**ecision Process | "Walk me through each step from today to signed contract." | Steps, owners, dates mapped |
| **I**dentify Pain | "What happens if this problem isn't solved by [date]?" | Quantified cost of inaction |
| **C**hampion | "Would you be comfortable presenting this internally without us?" | Four-part Champion test passed |
| **C**ompetition | "Who else are you evaluating — including doing nothing?" | Competitors + status quo named |
### Phase 5: Andy Whyte — Champion Test
Score the contact before calling them a Champion:
| # | Criterion | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Power to influence the decision | Can access EB and decision committee |
| 2 | Personal win if deal closes | Career, team, or KPI benefit articulated |
| 3 | Articulates problem without you | Repeats pain accurately in their words |
| 4 | Commits to internal selling | Agrees to present or multi-thread on your behalf |
All four required for Champion score = 2. Enthusiasm alone = 1 at best.
### Phase 6: MEDDICC Gap Analysis (Active Deals)
If CRM data exists, score current state and list gaps to close on this call:
```
MEDDICC Score: __/14
Gaps to close this meeting:
- [ ] Metrics — need quantified baseline
- [ ] Economic Buyer — identified but not met
- ...
```
Load `pipeline-management` for stage gate minimums before advancing the deal.
### Phase 7: Competitive Context
- Named competitors and status quo
- Decision criteria influence strategy (`competitive-intel`)
- Trap-setting questions for differentiators
## Output Format
One-page meeting brief. Use `templates/output-template.md` for structure.
```
# Meeting Brief: [Company]
Date | Attendees | Deal stage | MEDDICC score: __/14
## Company Snapshot
## Attendee Profiles (+ MEDDICC role)
## SPICED Questions (discovery)
## MEDDICC Questions (gaps to close)
## Champion Test (if applicable)
## Competitive Context
## Desired Outcome + Fallback
```
## Quality Check
- [ ] Account and attendee research current (last 30 days)
- [ ] Questions tailored to account — not generic templates
- [ ] SPICED questions included for discovery; MEDDICC for qualification deals
- [ ] Champion test applied if a champion is claimed
- [ ] MEDDICC gaps listed for active deals with target score for this meeting
- [ ] Brief readable in 60 seconds
- [ ] SPICED and MEDDICC map to same CRM fields — no conflicting data capture
## Common Pitfalls
1. **MEDDICC as a discovery script.** Running all seven dimensions on a first call
feels like an audit. Fix: SPICED first; MEDDICC scores build over calls.
2. **Champion = friendly contact.** Enthusiasm without power is score 1, not 2.
Fix: apply Whyte's four-part Champion test.
3. **Vendor-defined Metrics.** "You'll save 30%" is not M=2. Fix: buyer must
name the KPI and baseline.
4. **Ignoring status quo as Competition.** "No competitors" still has a competitor:
do nothing. Fix: always assess status quo.
5. **SPICED and MEDDICC in separate silos.** Reps capture Impact in SPICED notes
but leave Metrics blank. Fix: Impact field populates Metrics in CRM.
## Execution Artifacts
- `references/framework-notes.md` — SPICED/MEDDICC map, Champion test, question banks
- `templates/output-template.md` — one-page brief structure
- `scripts/check-output.py` — validates brief sections
- `references/keenan-gap-selling.md` — Gap Selling discovery, PIC, happy ears, checklists
## Related Skills
- `pipeline-management` — Stage gates, CRM fields, MEDDICC scorecard rules
- `sales-coaching` — Manager deal review using same scorecard
- `competitive-intel` — Battlecards for Competition dimension
- `multi-thread-orchestration` — When Champion cannot access EB alone
- `roi-calculator` — Metrics dimension business case
- `demo-scripts` — Post-discovery demo structure
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!