Skip to content
Back to skills

Improve Skills

ASecurity

Consolidates the retros of the agent flow and the objective signals (CI failures on agent branches, reverts) and proposes adjustments to the skills in a PR that a person reviews. It never edits the skills without a PR or loosens controls. Use with "/improve-skills", "what did we learn from the last runs?", "tune the skills with use" or in the scheduled weekly run.

  • 6 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 10, 2026
ai-agentsgobash

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 8 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned November 10, 2026

npx -y skills add lautioliver/barrilete-kit --skill improve-skills --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Improve Skills?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Improve Skills
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/lautioliver-improve-skills/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lautioliver-improve-skills)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: improve-skills
description: Consolidates the retros of the agent flow and the objective signals (CI failures on agent branches, reverts) and proposes adjustments to the skills in a PR that a person reviews. It never edits the skills without a PR or loosens controls. Use with "/improve-skills", "what did we learn from the last runs?", "tune the skills with use" or in the scheduled weekly run.
---

# Improve the skills with use

Skills learn from their use, but **they do not rewrite themselves**: this skill proposes, a person decides. An unchecked adjustment fits a single case, makes the skills longer and, above all, tends to remove the controls that stop the agent, which are precisely the most valuable thing.

## 1. Gather the signals

```bash
.claude/skills/improve-skills/signals.sh [days]
```

It brings the new retros from the `agents/retros` branch (since `consolidated.md`; one file per retro, with `skill_sha` to know which version of the skill it was done with, and `model` and `role` to know who did it) and those of the old `agentes/retros` branch (0.9), which is not rewritten: the old keys and values are shown with the new ones, so they count as the same group. It also brings the objective signals: CI failures on `claude/` branches grouped by workflow, and reverts. The objective signals weigh more than the retros: the agent does not see its own blind spots.

If there is nothing new, say so and finish.

## 2. Group by pattern

For each pattern: what happened, in which cases (links), and which skill or script would have prevented it. A pattern is something that repeats or was serious; an anecdote is not a pattern.

Group the deviations and findings by `model` and by `role`. If the same model fails repeatedly on a type of issue (`type:` or `area:`), it is a case for the routing rule of `orchestrate` (which issues go to Haiku and which to Sonnet): it is proposed in the PR, without loosening the escalation of `agents_map.py` or the reviewer. Retros with `model: unknown` or `role: session` do not enter that comparison.

## 3. Decide what to propose

Rules, in this order:

1. **At least two cases, or one serious one.** Serious: a bug that reached review or production, a broken business rule, data or money at risk.
2. **Never remove or loosen** Autonomy rules (the "Agent autonomy" section of `AGENTS.md`), approvals, verifications or the "does not merge / does not approve". If a control stops things often for no reason, it is raised as a **question for the team** in the PR, not as a change.
3. **Script before text.** If it can be verified mechanically (a CI check, a control in `verify.py` or `prepare.sh`), do that; one more instruction in Markdown is the last resort. Instructions are what the agent skips.
4. **Maximum length:** no `SKILL.md` goes over 120 lines. If an adjustment does not fit, something else has to be removed or moved to a script.
5. **One change per pattern**, with its reason and the cases that justify it.
6. **Rules:** what is useful but not enough to change a skill (one case, or something that cannot be verified with a script) is proposed as a `proposed` rule in a PR to `barrilete-rules` (ADR-006 D1), with its evidence. A person accepts it by merging; `sync-rules` then injects it into the roles. The kit keeps no lessons file, and the other agents never read raw retros.

## 4. Propose in a PR

Branch `claude/<n>-improve-skills-<date>` (with a `type:task` issue), based on the working trunk branch. The PR body:

```markdown
## Patterns found
| Pattern | Cases | Proposed adjustment |
## Questions for the team
(controls that stop things often; none of this is changed in this PR)
## Discarded
(anecdotes or cases that do not meet the rules)
```

Show the PR draft before opening it and wait for a "yes".

## 5. Mark what is consolidated

With the PR open, mark how far you consolidated with the commit that `signals.sh` printed ("consolidate up to"):

```bash
.claude/skills/improve-skills/retro.sh --consolidated <commit> <link to the PR>
```

`signals.sh` prints one commit per branch (the new one and the 0.9 one): mark each. It writes `consolidated.md` on the `agents/retros` branch (the 0.9 branch's point goes there too: that branch is not touched); the next run starts from there. Use that commit and not the current tip: that way you do not skip retros that arrived while you were putting the PR together.

## Scheduling it

To have it run on its own (for example, on Mondays), use a scheduled task that runs `/improve-skills`. It still ends in a PR to review: scheduling it does not give it permission to merge.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.es.md4.4 KB
  • SKILL.md4.5 KB
  • legacy-names.sh2.6 KB
  • retro-template.es.md1 KB
  • retro-template.md1.1 KB
  • retro.sh9.4 KB
  • signals.sh3.8 KB
  • test-retros.sh30.6 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

View all in ai-agents →

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.