Use when the user asks for magi, Open-Magi, @Open-Magi, deliberation, three sages, or multi-agent research
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ladiossoop5star/open_magi --skill magi --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Magi?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ladiossoop5star-magi-dd4ec2d1)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: magi
description: Use when the user asks for magi, Open-Magi, @Open-Magi, deliberation, three sages, or multi-agent research
---
# Magi
## Overview
Run a coding-agent proposal-first deliberation loop. The main agent owns
decisions, implementation, verification, checkpoint commits, rollback, and
final reporting. Three read-only deliberator sub-agents only research and
report. Runtime adapters may add guardrails; otherwise the main agent enforces
gates.
Core rule: completion is based on explicit `acceptanceCriteria` and
`verificationCommands`, not on confidence or subjective judgment, and requires
the review council to approve the actual diff before `final-report.md`.
Proposal-first rule: before any fix direction is selected, the main agent prepares an evidence packet and does not propose a fix. The three deliberators propose directions first; the main agent selects one direction; then the deliberators review that selected direction before execution.
Council modes tracked in `currentCouncilMode`: `recon` (round 1 parallel
evidence gathering), `decision` (proposal-first), `review` (adversarial diff
review).
## Required Reference Loading
Load the listed reference before acting in that situation:
| Situation | Required reference |
|---|---|
| Starting or resuming Magi | `references/protocol.md` |
| Creating `checklist.md` or changing phase | `references/checklist-template.md` |
| Writing prompts, reports, synthesis, or verdict | `references/deliberation.md` |
| Launching subagents or handling runtime adapter behavior | `references/runtime.md` |
| Before any user-facing question | `references/question-firewall.md` |
| Executing changes, verification, checkpoint, rollback, or next-round evidence | `references/execution-and-verification.md` |
| Plugin repair, corrupt state, timeout, or repeated failure | `references/troubleshooting.md` |
## When to Use
Use this skill when the user says `start deliberation`, `magi`, `three sages`,
`deliberation loop`, `loop until done`, or requests repeated research ->
synthesize -> act -> verify until completion.
Do not use it for small one-shot answers.
## Roles
Main agent:
- Extracts goal, criteria, and verification commands.
- Writes `.open_magi/magi-log/state.json`, prompts, reports, decisions, checks,
checkpoint commits, rollback evidence, and final report.
- Launches all three deliberator subtasks and synthesizes their reports.
Sub-agents:
- `deliberator-melchior`: practical engineering feasibility and edge cases.
- `deliberator-balthasar`: architecture, maintainability, long-term design.
- `deliberator-casper`: debugging, root cause, failure paths.
Use these role names for report files even with generic runtime subagents.
Sub-agent restrictions:
- sub-agents do not edit files;
- sub-agents do not run build/test/format/deploy commands;
- sub-agents do not produce the final answer for the user;
- sub-agents only report analysis to the main agent.
## Runtime State
State file path: `.open_magi/magi-log/state.json`.
Create it before the first research round with `schemaVersion`, `goal`,
`acceptanceCriteria`, `verificationCommands`, `active`, `projectRoot`,
`currentRound`, `currentPhase`, `currentDeliberationPass`,
`maxDeliberationPasses`, `deliberationStatus`, `currentCouncilMode`,
`deliberatorTimeoutMs`, `activeDeliberators`, `deliberatorTimeoutCounts`,
`needsContinue`, `inFlight`, `inFlightSince`, `consecutiveNoProgress`,
`verdict`, `lastError`, and `history`. Use `schemaVersion: 2`. Full schema and
artifact layout are in `references/protocol.md`.
Runtime-adapter-owned fields: `inFlight`, `inFlightSince`, `lastPromptedRound`,
`lastPromptedAt`, `activeDeliberators`, and `deliberatorTimeoutCounts`.
The main agent must not set `inFlight=true` manually.
Use atomic complete writes where possible; never leave partial JSON.
`goal_definition` is only valid for initial setup. currentRound > 1 must never use `goal_definition`; resume later rounds at `status_assessment`.
Reproduction commands may be declared in `baselineCommands`; guards allow them
outside execution, but code edits stay execution-only.
## Phase Transition Checklist Gate
Create `.open_magi/magi-log/checklist.md` immediately after `state.json` using
`references/checklist-template.md`.
Before every phase transition, read `.open_magi/magi-log/checklist.md`, verify
the current transition section item by item, and only then update
`state.json.currentPhase`.
The checklist is a required runtime artifact, not optional documentation. Its
universal gate includes:
- `question_classification` was completed before any user question.
- No procedural question was asked; all procedural choices followed the Magi contract.
If a deliberator does not return a usable result, still write that
deliberator's `report-*.md` file with failure evidence and a blocking question
instead of omitting the file.
## Report Integrity Gate
Before ending a turn while `active=true`, verify log files match state:
- `research_task` has `round-NNN/research-prompt.md`.
- Round 1 at `research_task` or later has `round-NNN/recon-001/prompt.md`, all
three recon reports, and `round-NNN/evidence-base.md`.
- Synthesis or later has all three current council reports.
- `synthesis` or later has current `synthesis.md`.
- Review pass 2 or later has `round-NNN/direction-selection.md`.
- `ready_for_verdict`, `execution`, or later has `verdict.md`.
- Any executed command has `verification.md` with command, exit code, and important output.
- `completion_review` has `round-NNN/cleanup.md`, `review-001/prompt.md`,
and all three review reports; closing adds `round-NNN/review-verdict.md`
with `outcome: approved` and `verdict_adherence_confirmed: yes`.
- Satisfied acceptance criteria have an approved review verdict and
`final-report.md` before `active=false`.
After writing each artifact, update `state.json`. Set `needsContinue=true`
whenever work remains. Never end with `active=true`, a non-terminal
`currentPhase`, and `needsContinue=false`.
## Council Pass Gate
Use bounded multi-pass proposal-first deliberation in `decision` mode before
editing code or running verification. State fields are
`currentDeliberationPass` and `maxDeliberationPasses`.
Rules:
- The default `maxDeliberationPasses` is 3.
- The hard maximum is 5.
- The enforced minimum is 3, because proposal-first deliberation needs one
proposal pass, one review pass, and one bounded refinement/decision budget.
- Effective veto passes equal `maxDeliberationPasses - 2`.
- Pass 1 is the proposal pass. Deliberators propose directions from the
evidence packet. Pass 1 is not a veto pass.
- After Pass 1, the main agent writes `round-NNN/direction-selection.md` with
the selected direction, rejected alternatives, and verification pressure.
- Pass 2 starts veto review of the selected direction: any `stance: oppose`,
`stance: needs_evidence`, or `blocking_objection: yes` requires another pass
unless `maxDeliberationPasses` has been reached.
- From Pass 2 onward, write a verdict only when at least two of three
deliberators support the same executable plan, no new high-risk blocking
objection exists, and a clear verification plan exists.
- At `maxDeliberationPasses`, do not ask the user for direction. Choose the
smallest reversible verifiable diagnostic or modification, write it into
`verdict.md`, and continue.
Do not ask the user whether another council pass is needed. The gate decides.
## Cleanup and Completion Review Gates
Before the completion claim, run the cleanup gate:
- set `currentPhase=cleanup`;
- split the round's full diff into fix changes and supporting changes
(protective mechanisms, defensive checks, refactors, or problem-unrelated
implementation);
- audit every fix change one by one: remove redundant or ineffective fix
changes, and verify each kept fix change individually (what breaks without
it, plus the test, output, or trace that proves it is required);
- do not remove supporting changes here; list them for the review council;
- re-run the verification commands;
- write `round-NNN/cleanup.md` with per-fix-change keep/remove reasons,
individual verification evidence, the deferred supporting-change list, and
post-cleanup verification output.
Only then, before writing `final-report.md`, run exactly one adversarial
review pass:
- set `currentPhase=completion_review` and `currentCouncilMode=review`;
- write `round-NNN/review-001/prompt.md` with the acceptance criteria,
`verdict.md`, `verification.md`, `cleanup.md`, and the actual diff, never
only a summary;
- launch all three deliberators and write the three
`round-NNN/review-001/report-*.md` files;
- write `round-NNN/review-verdict.md` with `outcome`,
`verdict_adherence_confirmed`, and all three stances.
`final-report.md` is allowed only when `outcome: approved` and
`verdict_adherence_confirmed: yes`. After approval, squash the loop's
checkpoint commits into a single commit, re-run the verification commands,
then write `final-report.md` with a standalone `squash_commit: <hash|none>`
line and the post-squash verification output; then Set `currentPhase=complete`
and `active=false`. An objected review starts the
next round with the objections as evidence.
## Procedural Autonomy Gate
Do not ask procedural questions. If the answer is defined by the Magi skill,
checklist, `state.json`, phase contract, log layout, role table, or report
format, execute the defined action and write the required artifact.
Forbidden procedural questions include:
- whether to write report files;
- which role each deliberator should play;
- whether to launch all three deliberator subtasks;
- whether to use one shared research prompt;
- where report files should be written;
- whether to create `synthesis.md`, `verdict.md`, or `verification.md`;
- whether verification failure should start the next round;
- whether another council pass is needed.
When unsure about a procedural step, read `checklist.md`, this skill, and the
required reference, then do the specified action. Do not convert procedural
uncertainty into a user question.
## Before Asking User Gate
Before asking the user anything, write or mentally apply `question_classification`:
- `procedural`: forbidden to ask; follow the Magi contract.
- `goal_ambiguity`: ask only in the first round during goal_definition or
status_assessment when no reasonable testable default can be inferred.
- `debug_direction`: ask only in the first round during status_assessment
before execution; otherwise choose from evidence, reports, verification
output, and acceptance criteria.
- `execution_blocker`: ask only when local context cannot resolve hardware,
credential, network, DUT, external service, or command execution blockers.
- `destructive_or_unrelated_risk`: ask before destructive or unrelated changes.
- `ambiguous_file_ownership`: ask before staging or modifying files when
ownership of changed files is unclear.
If classification is not allowed for the current phase, do not ask. Execute the
next Magi step and record the decision.
## Question Request Firewall
The main agent must not ask the user directly during an active Magi loop.
Before any user-facing question, read `references/question-firewall.md`, then
write `.open_magi/magi-log/question-request.md` with `classification`,
`phase`, `question`, `why_local_context_failed`, `commands_or_files_checked`,
and `default_action_if_denied`.
The plugin may deny the request and write `.open_magi/magi-log/question-denied.md`.
If denied, do not repeat the question. Find the answer from local context,
choose the safest verifiable default action, write the decision into the next
Magi artifact, and continue.
Allowed requests are limited to first-round `goal_ambiguity`, first-round
`debug_direction`, `execution_blocker`, `impossible_verification`,
`destructive_or_unrelated_risk`, and `ambiguous_file_ownership`. `procedural`
is always denied.
## Debug Direction Gate
Direction questions are allowed only during first-round Phase 1, before
execution starts. During first-round status_assessment, ask only for missing
constraints that cannot be inferred from the repository, logs, tests, or user
goal.
From Phase 2 onward: Do not ask the user which debug direction to try next.
The main agent must choose the next debug direction from evidence, reports,
verification output, and acceptance criteria.
The only allowed questions after Phase 1 are:
- verification is impossible because required hardware, credentials, network,
devices, or external services are unavailable;
- an execution blocker prevents progress and cannot be resolved from local context;
- proceeding would risk destructive or unrelated changes.
If none of those exceptions apply, write the chosen direction into `verdict.md`,
execute it, verify it, and continue the loop.
## Checkpoint Commit and Rollback Gate
If Phase 5 changes code:
- run the build or compile verification before runtime verification;
- if build succeeds, create a local git checkpoint commit before continuing;
- stage only files changed by the main agent for this round;
- do not stage `.open_magi/` runtime logs or unrelated user changes;
- use a message like `magi: round-NNN checkpoint - <summary>`;
- write its hash into `round-NNN/verification.md`.
If build fails:
- do not create a checkpoint commit;
- write the build command, exit code, and important output into `verification.md`;
- record that the next round must revert this round's uncommitted code changes
before writing the next `research-prompt.md`.
If build succeeds but later runtime verification fails, keep the checkpoint
commit and pass the hash plus failure evidence to the next round. The next
`verdict.md` must choose either continue from the checkpoint or revert the
checkpoint commit.
## Round Transition Gate
When a round fails and the goal is still incomplete:
- append the Phase 6 history entry with failure and diagnostic evidence;
- include `progress: true|false`;
- increment `currentRound`;
- reset `currentDeliberationPass=1`;
- reset `deliberationStatus=not_started`;
- reset `currentCouncilMode=decision`;
- set `currentPhase=status_assessment`, not `goal_definition`;
- set `needsContinue=true`;
- clear `inFlight` and `inFlightSince`.
If build failed before a checkpoint commit, revert this round's uncommitted code
changes before the next Phase 2 research prompt.
Phase 1 in later rounds is a short status check only. Phase 2 only writes the
next prompt artifacts. Do not perform extended single-agent debugging between
failed verification and the next deliberator pass.
## Six Phases
0. Goal Definition: infer or define goal, `acceptanceCriteria`, and
`verificationCommands`; inspect relevant project context; write initial
`state.json` and checklist.
1. Status Assessment: compare criteria, latest `verification.md`, and current
filesystem. Round 1 splits into Phase 1a minimal scoping (main agent writes
`recon-001/prompt.md`, no deep-dive) and Phase 1b parallel recon (all three
deliberators investigate read-only; main agent writes `evidence-base.md`).
Later rounds skip recon and reuse previous verification evidence.
2. Research Task: write `round-NNN/research-prompt.md` (round 1 draws from
`evidence-base.md`) and `round-NNN/council-PPP/prompt.md`; for pass 1 this
is an evidence packet, not a proposed fix; for pass 2+ include
`direction-selection.md`.
3. Parallel Deliberation: start all three configured deliberator subtasks with
the same prompt and write all three `report-*.md` files. Pass 1 reports are
direction proposals; later reports review the selected direction.
4. Synthesis and Decision: write current `synthesis.md`; apply Council Pass
Gate; after pass 1 write `direction-selection.md`, otherwise start another
pass or write `verdict.md`.
5. Execute and Verify: only the main agent acts; apply verdict, build, checkpoint
if build succeeds, verify, run fail-only diagnostics if needed, and write
`verification.md`.
6. Goal Check: judge acceptance criteria; on a completion claim run the
Cleanup Gate (`cleanup.md`), then the Completion Review Gate
(`completion_review` phase, review council, `review-verdict.md`); complete
only on `outcome: approved`, otherwise continue next round, or block only
after the no-progress limit.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!