Step 0 of consequential software work under Monozukuri, run by monozukuri-core. Classify the task, assess its risk tier, choose execute or sensei mode, and compose the sequence of Monozukuri skills and the Definition of Done for it. Skip for trivial one-line edits, pure questions, and throwaway scripts.
Scanned 9/28/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add kuya-egg/Monozukuri --skill monozukuri-router --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Monozukuri Router?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/kuya-egg-monozukuri-router)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: monozukuri-router
description: "Step 0 of consequential software work under Monozukuri, run by monozukuri-core. Classify the task, assess its risk tier, choose execute or sensei mode, and compose the sequence of Monozukuri skills and the Definition of Done for it. Skip for trivial one-line edits, pure questions, and throwaway scripts."
user-invocable: false
---
# Monozukuri router
The router does no engineering work itself. It decides which Monozukuri
practices apply to the task in front of it and in what order, emits a plan
header, and hands off to the composed sequence.
## Use this skill when
- any feature, bugfix, refactor, incident, migration, release, or
investigation that is more than a one-line change;
- the user asks to be guided or taught;
- the user asks for a review of their own approach; or
- the user asks to set up Monozukuri for a project.
## Do not use when
- the change is a trivial one-liner;
- the request is a pure question with no change to the system; or
- the code is a throwaway script.
## Procedure
1. **Choose interaction mode.** `execute` (default) or `sensei`. Route to
`sensei` when the user asks to be guided / taught / reviewed / set up.
Incident or "production is down" language forces `execute`. Detail in
`monozukuri-core/references/sensei.md`.
2. **Classify the task.** Pick one type: `feature`, `bugfix`, `refactor`,
`incident`, `migration`, `release`, `investigation`, `docs`, `greenfield`
(a new project, or a new standalone subsystem, built from scratch). Set
context flags: `security`, `performance`, `production`, `data`, `auth`.
3. **Assess risk.** Tier `low|medium|high|critical` per
`monozukuri-core/references/constitution.md`. When signals disagree, take
the higher tier.
4. **Low-risk fast-path.** If the tier is `low` and no modifier applies
(documentation work is nearly always this): emit
`fast-path: apply genchi-genbutsu + kanso + kodawari inline` and stop. Never
inflate a small task.
5. **Compose.** Look up the playbook in
`monozukuri-core/references/playbooks.md`; apply the `security` /
`performance` modifiers matching the context flags; scale verification
depth by risk tier. For `greenfield`, the sequence begins `nemawashi →
monozukuri-blueprint`; the four blueprint stages are gated on user
approval, and phases execute one at a time after stage 4.
6. **Decide execution mode per step.** Default every step to inline. Mark a
step for delegation only when it matches a row in the inline-vs-delegated
table in `monozukuri-core/references/orchestration.md` — an independent
investigation, an independently verifiable implementation step, parallel
disjoint work, or independent review on high/critical risk. Never delegate
integration or the final call.
7. **Plan checkpoints.** When the work splits into more than one unit, size
each unit and order them smallest first within dependency order, each
ending at a verified checkpoint, per
`monozukuri-core/references/checkpoints.md`. Skip for single-unit work.
8. **Emit the plan header** (see Output).
## Output
```text
Task: <one line>
Mode: <execute|sensei>
Context: <type> [+security] [+performance] Risk: <tier> → <human gate>
Monozukuri sequence:
<skill> → <skill> → [<injected step>] → <skill [subagent: role]> ...
DoD: <n> items (<playbook> [+modifiers], <tier>) — see monozukuri-core/references/definition-of-done.md
Change budget: declare expected file scope before CHANGE (see change-budget.md)
Checkpoints: <n> units, smallest first (multi-unit work only — see checkpoints.md)
```
`[subagent: role]` marks a step delegated per
`monozukuri-core/references/orchestration.md`; an unmarked step runs inline.
Worked example:
```text
Task: add OAuth login
Mode: execute
Context: feature +security Risk: high → architecture-approval gate
Monozukuri sequence:
nemawashi → genchi-genbutsu → kanso → [threat-model]
→ poka-yoke (+security test cases) → kata [subagent: implementer]
→ kodawari (+security review) [subagent: reviewer] → andon (+security observability)
→ shukka (+security verification) → hansei
DoD: 11 items (feature + security, high) — see monozukuri-core/references/definition-of-done.md
Change budget: declare expected file scope before CHANGE (see change-budget.md)
```
```text
Task: build a new invoicing service from scratch
Mode: execute
Context: greenfield Risk: high → architecture-approval gate
Monozukuri sequence:
nemawashi → monozukuri-blueprint (4 gated stages)
→ per phase: kanso → kata → poka-yoke → kodawari → andon → shukka → hansei
DoD: 8 items (greenfield, high) — see monozukuri-core/references/definition-of-done.md
```
## Handoff
After the header, proceed through the composed sequence using each named
skill in order. `monozukuri-core` remains the umbrella contract
(DISCOVER/CHANGE/PROVE) that governs the whole task.
If a referenced skill is not installed, apply its named lens inline instead of
trying to invoke it.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!