Skip to content
Back to skills

Gsd Remove Phase

ASecurity

Remove a future phase from roadmap and renumber subsequent phases

  • 91 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added June 2, 2026
ai-agentsgit

Works with

  • claude code

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned June 2, 2026

npx -y skills add kursku/skills --skill gsd-remove-phase --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Gsd Remove Phase?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Gsd Remove Phase
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/kursku-gsd-remove-phase/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/kursku-gsd-remove-phase)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: "gsd-remove-phase"
description: "Remove a future phase from roadmap and renumber subsequent phases"
metadata:
  short-description: "Remove a future phase from roadmap and renumber subsequent phases"
risk: safe
---

<codex_skill_adapter>
## A. Skill Invocation
- This skill is invoked by mentioning `$gsd-remove-phase`.
- Treat all user text after `$gsd-remove-phase` as `{{GSD_ARGS}}`.
- If no arguments are present, treat `{{GSD_ARGS}}` as empty.

## B. AskUserQuestion → request_user_input Mapping
GSD workflows use `AskUserQuestion` (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex `request_user_input`:

Parameter mapping:
- `header` → `header`
- `question` → `question`
- Options formatted as `"Label" — description` → `{label: "Label", description: "description"}`
- Generate `id` from header: lowercase, replace spaces with underscores

Batched calls:
- `AskUserQuestion([q1, q2])` → single `request_user_input` with multiple entries in `questions[]`

Multi-select workaround:
- Codex has no `multiSelect`. Use sequential single-selects, or present a numbered freeform list asking the user to enter comma-separated numbers.

Execute mode fallback:
- When `request_user_input` is rejected (Execute mode), present a plain-text numbered list and pick a reasonable default.

## C. Task() → spawn_agent Mapping
GSD workflows use `Task(...)` (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex collaboration tools:

Direct mapping:
- `Task(subagent_type="X", prompt="Y")` → `spawn_agent(agent_type="X", message="Y")`
- `Task(model="...")` → omit (Codex uses per-role config, not inline model selection)
- `fork_context: false` by default — GSD agents load their own context via `<files_to_read>` blocks

Parallel fan-out:
- Spawn multiple agents → collect agent IDs → `wait(ids)` for all to complete

Result parsing:
- Look for structured markers in agent output: `CHECKPOINT`, `PLAN COMPLETE`, `SUMMARY`, etc.
- `close_agent(id)` after collecting results from each agent
</codex_skill_adapter>

<objective>
Remove an unstarted future phase from the roadmap and renumber all subsequent phases to maintain a clean, linear sequence.

Purpose: Clean removal of work you've decided not to do, without polluting context with cancelled/deferred markers.
Output: Phase deleted, all subsequent phases renumbered, git commit as historical record.
</objective>

<execution_context>
@C:/Users/nicol/.codex/get-shit-done/workflows/remove-phase.md
</execution_context>

<context>
Phase: {{GSD_ARGS}}

Roadmap and state are resolved in-workflow via `init phase-op` and targeted reads.
</context>

<process>
Execute the remove-phase workflow from @C:/Users/nicol/.codex/get-shit-done/workflows/remove-phase.md end-to-end.
Preserve all validation gates (future phase check, work check), renumbering logic, and commit.
</process>

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.