Skip to content
Back to skills

Convention Setup

ASecurity

Installs project conventions and reversible loading guidance; extracts representative implementations, patterns, architecture, and accepted rules. Triggers: convention setup, extract conventions, etalon classes.

  • 32 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 1, 2026
ai-agentstypescriptpythonrustgojavakotlinshellbashsqltesting

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 9 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 6, 2026

npx -y skills add kochetkov-ma/claude-brewcode --skill convention-setup --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Convention Setup?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Convention Setup
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/kochetkov-ma-convention-setup-claude-brewcode/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/kochetkov-ma-convention-setup-claude-brewcode)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: convention-setup
description: "Installs project conventions and reversible loading guidance; extracts representative implementations, patterns, architecture, and accepted rules. Triggers: convention setup, extract conventions, etalon classes."
user-invocable: true
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: "[prompt] [status|install|upgrade|enable|disable|uninstall|purge|full|conventions|rules|paths <p1,p2>]"
allowed-tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash, Agent, AskUserQuestion, Skill]
model: opus
---

<!-- brewcode-meta: version=6.4.0 content_version=6.3.0 generated_by=brewcode:convention-setup -->

<instructions>

## Prompt contract

Treat `$ARGUMENTS` as a free-form RU/EN prompt. Modes/flags may appear anywhere; infer mode and scope from prose.

1. Strip flags. An explicit mode token anywhere wins outright, no scoring.
2. Else score modes by distinct whole-word keyword hits (table below). Highest unique score wins.
   Tie with a destructive mode -> `AskUserQuestion`; tie with `status` -> `status`;
   tie of two mutating modes -> the keyword appearing first; all zero -> `install`.
3. Empty arguments -> `install`; ask ONE scoping `AskUserQuestion` only when the answer
   changes what gets written. A read-only run asks nothing.
4. Outcome-changing ambiguity -> ONE `AskUserQuestion` (max 4 questions) BEFORE any work.
5. Prose that is not a mode/id/path is still input: extract the id, path or target from it.

Then print this block ONCE, before the first action:

```
PLAN — brewcode:convention-setup
INPUT:  <arguments verbatim, or "(empty)">
MODE:   <resolved> — <explicit | matched keyword: X | default>
SCOPE:  <resolved paths / target / level / flags>
DO:     <2-5 imperative bullets>
RESULT: <what the user ends up holding>
```

Labels are literal; values follow the conversation language.

## Mode Detection

**Arguments:** `$ARGUMENTS`

| Mode | Invocation | Phases | Prerequisites | EN keywords | RU keywords | Mutates? |
|------|-----------|--------|---------------|--------------|--------------|----------|
| `status` | `/brewcode:convention-setup status` | Lifecycle | None | `status`, `installed`, `check` | `статус`, `установлено`, `проверь` | no |
| `install` (default) | `/brewcode:convention-setup install` | P0-P8, activate loading | None | `install`, `setup` | `установи`, `настрой` | yes |
| `upgrade` | `/brewcode:convention-setup upgrade` | P0-P8, preserve disabled state | Existing docs | `upgrade`, `refresh` | `обнови`, `освежи` | yes |
| `enable` | `/brewcode:convention-setup enable` | Lifecycle | Loading rule exists | `enable`, `activate` | `включи`, `активируй` | yes |
| `disable` | `/brewcode:convention-setup disable` | Lifecycle | Loading rule exists | `disable`, `deactivate` | `выключи`, `отключи` | yes |
| `uninstall` | `/brewcode:convention-setup uninstall` | Lifecycle | None | `uninstall` | `удали установку` | yes |
| `purge` | `/brewcode:convention-setup purge` | Lifecycle | None | `purge`, `erase` | `очисти полностью`, `сотри` | yes |
| `full` | `/brewcode:convention-setup full` | P0-P8 | None | `full`, `all`, `everything`, `complete` | `полностью`, `всё`, `весь` | yes |
| `conventions` | `/brewcode:convention-setup conventions` | P0-P6 | None | `conventions`, `patterns`, `etalons`, `extract` | `конвенции`, `паттерны`, `эталоны`, `извлеки` | yes |
| `rules` | `/brewcode:convention-setup rules` | P0, P7, P7.5, P8 | `.claude/convention/` exists | `rules`, `extract rules` | `правила`, `извлеки правила` | yes |
| `paths` | `/brewcode:convention-setup paths src/a,src/b` | P0-P7 scoped | None | `paths`, `scope`, `subset` | `пути`, `путям`, `часть проекта` | yes |

`paths` also needs its comma-separated path list extracted from the prose whenever the
user names files/dirs instead of typing the literal `paths` token.

---

## Lifecycle — status first

After the PLAN, run `bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/convention.sh" status` in the project root.
Stop on any script failure; report the ownership/collision error without changing files.
For `status`, report the JSON and stop. For `enable`, `disable`, `uninstall`, or `purge`, run the
same script with that exact mode, report its result, and stop; no analysis or regeneration.
Before `purge`, confirm the exact three generated document paths once unless the user explicitly
requested their deletion. `uninstall` removes only the loading rule. `purge` also deletes the
three owned generated documents. Both preserve accepted rules, other files, and CLAUDE.md.

`install` and `full` run the original full extraction; `upgrade` repeats it with current evidence.
Preserve existing local wording, cite proposed changes, and never overwrite unrelated documents.
At P8, validate all three docs, then run the script's `install` (or `upgrade`) command. It creates
`.claude/rules/convention.md` with lazy-loading guidance, or refreshes its metadata without
changing local wording. A parked rule stays parked on install/upgrade.
`conventions` runs P0-P6 then validates and activates loading, leaving other rules untouched;
`rules` consumes existing docs; `paths` refreshes scoped evidence without deleting other layers.

`disable` parks only the generated loading rule as `.claude/rules/convention.md.disabled`;
`enable` restores its byte-identical body. Accepted coding rules and existing manual CLAUDE.md
references are user-owned and remain active; explain this boundary when disabling/removing.
For new installs, the loading rule is the convention discovery mechanism: do not also add the
optional P7.5 CLAUDE.md references unless the user explicitly requests them.

---

## P0: Mode + Stack Detection

Parse `$ARGUMENTS` for mode keyword. Default = `install`. For `paths` mode: split comma-separated paths after keyword.

### Step 0.1: Detect Stack

**EXECUTE** using Bash tool:
```bash
bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/convention.sh" detect-stack && echo "---DETECT-OK---" || echo "---DETECT-FAILED---"
```

Output: JSON `{"stacks":[...],"primary":"...","build_file":"...","modules":[...]}`.

| Primary Stack | Active Layers |
|---------------|-------------|
| java, kotlin | L1-L14, T1-T6 (all) |
| typescript | L1-L6, L8, L10-L11, L13-L14, T1-T3, T5-T6 |
| python | L1-L2, L4-L6, L8, L10, L13-L14, T1-T3, T5-T6 |
| rust | L1-L2, L4-L6, L8, L10-L11, T5 |
| go | L1-L2, L4-L6, L8, L10, T5 |
| Multi-stack | Union of all detected |
| other/unknown | All main layers (L1-L14), all test layers (T1-T6) — agent determines relevance per layer |

### Step 0.2: Scan Project

**EXECUTE** using Bash tool:
```bash
bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/convention.sh" scan && echo "---SCAN-OK---" || echo "---SCAN-FAILED---"
```

Output: JSON with `source_dirs`, `file_counts`, `modules`, `total_files`.
`total_files` = every scanned file; `file_counts` = the top ten extensions only, so its values do not sum to `total_files`.

> If `total_files` > 1000: warn user, suggest `paths` mode.

### Step 0.3: Setup Convention Directory

**EXECUTE** using Bash tool:
```bash
bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/convention.sh" setup && echo "---SETUP-OK---" || echo "---SETUP-FAILED---"
```

> **STOP if FAILED** -- cannot proceed without output directory.

Output: JSON `{"path":".claude/convention/","version":"...","content_version":"...","generated_by":"brewcode:convention-setup","last_updated":"YYYY-MM-DD"}`.
Store `version` / `content_version` / `generated_by` / `last_updated` — P4 stamps them into every generated doc.

> **Artifact metadata — the three docs this skill writes.** `.claude/convention/reference-patterns.md`,
> `testing-conventions.md` and `project-architecture.md` each open with this frontmatter, filled from
> the JSON above and from nowhere else — the script resolves the version from the plugin manifest by
> self-location and the date from `date +%F`, so never hardcode either and never invent a second date
> spelling:
>
> ```yaml
> ---
> doc_type: llm
> version: "{PLUGIN_VERSION}"
> content_version: "{CONTENT_VERSION}"
> generated_by: "brewcode:convention-setup"
> last_updated: "{LAST_UPDATED}"
> ---
> ```
>
> `{CONTENT_VERSION}` is the JSON's `content_version`; `{PLUGIN_VERSION}` is its `version`, `{LAST_UPDATED}` its `last_updated`. Substitute all three
> before writing — a token that reaches the file literally is reported `partial` by `setup-status`.
> `doc_type` stays UNQUOTED; the other four are quoted.
>
> Re-running the skill over existing docs refreshes all three values in place.

### Step 0.4: Validate (rules mode only)

**EXECUTE** using Bash tool:
```bash
bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/convention.sh" validate && echo "---VALID---" || echo "---INVALID---"
```

> If `rules` mode + `INVALID` -- exit: "Run `/brewcode:convention-setup conventions` first."
> `validate` fails a doc that exists but carries no standard frontmatter (a pre-5.0 run wrote it):
> the named key is printed on stderr. Re-run `/brewcode:convention-setup conventions` to regenerate and
> stamp it.

---

## P1: Load Layer Definitions

Read `references/analysis-layers.md`. Filter layers by detected stack from P0. For `paths` mode: further filter by specified paths — match layer file patterns against provided paths. Build `ACTIVE_LAYERS` for P2.

---

## P2: Parallel Layer Analysis (10 agents, ONE message)

### Delegation (applies to EVERY Agent spawn — P2, P3, P4, P5, P7.4)

One agent owns ONE layer analysis or ONE document, ~<=5 files, ~<=10 steps. Bigger MUST be split into N tasks, spawned in ONE message; analysis runs as 10 layer agents.

Every spawn prompt MUST carry:

| Field | Content |
|-------|---------|
| GOAL | the overall task and why it exists — the point beyond the file edit |
| ROLE | what this agent owns; what it must NOT touch |
| SCOPE | exact paths/commands in bounds + explicit out-of-bounds |
| CONTEXT | what is already done, by whom, what runs in parallel — trimmed to what THIS agent needs |
| CONSUMER | who or what uses the result next, and the shape it must fit |
| DONE | acceptance criteria + the exact report shape you want back |

A bare one-line task is never enough. The per-agent template below is the canonical shape.

### Dynamic Agent Resolution

Before spawning agents, check for project team agents:
1. If `.claude/teams/` exists — read `team.md` for agent roster with domains
2. If team has architecture/testing domain agents — prefer them over generic agents
3. Priority: **team agent > project agent > plugin agent > system agent**
4. If agent refuses (Task Acceptance Protocol) — re-delegate to suggested colleague (max 2 retries)

Spawn ALL agents in a SINGLE message. Skip agents for inactive layers (filtered in P1).

| # | Agent | Layers | Focus |
|---|-------|--------|-------|
| 1 | Explore | L1-L3 | Build config, dependency management, code generation |
| 2 | Explore | L4 | @UtilityClass, static helpers, shared converters |
| 3 | Explore | L5+L14 | REST endpoints, security, config, caching |
| 4 | Explore | L6+L9 | DI patterns, @Transactional, domain services |
| 5 | Explore | L7 | Feign clients, external API integrations |
| 6 | Explore | L8 | JOOQ DSL, raw SQL, mappers, query patterns |
| 7 | Explore | L10+L11 | Records, @Value @Builder, naming conventions |
| 8 | Explore | L12+L13 | DDL scripts, config files, templates |
| 9 | Explore | T1-T4 | Test data, base classes, helpers, ExpectedData |
| 10 | Explore | T5-T6 | BDD style, assertion patterns, @ParameterizedTest |

**Per-agent prompt template — every spawn carries all six Delegation fields:**

```
GOAL: we are extracting this project's coding conventions into .claude/convention/ docs.
      Your layer analysis is ONE input; 9 sibling agents cover the other layers in parallel.
ROLE: you own the analysis of {LAYERS} only. Read-only — do NOT edit any file, do NOT
      analyse layers owned by siblings.
SCOPE: source files matching {LAYERS} patterns. For paths mode, scope analysis to: {SCOPED_PATHS}.
       Out of bounds: every other layer.
CONTEXT: P1 already detected the stack and filtered out inactive layers — do not re-detect.
      9 sibling agents analyse the other layers in this same message; assume their layers are
      covered and do not report findings about them.
Stack: {DETECTED_STACK}

Layer definitions:
{LAYER_CRITERIA_FROM_ANALYSIS_LAYERS_MD}

Use Bash search for file discovery (`grep`->ugrep / `find`->bfs on macOS CC), then Read for verification.

CONSUMER: P3 (1 `Plan` agent) merges all 10 reports and picks 1-2 etalons per layer, then P4
      writes .claude/convention/*.md from that. Your tables are parsed as-is — keep the exact
      column shape below, score every candidate, and give file paths, not prose.

DONE — report in exactly this format:

## Etalon Candidates
| Class | Path | Why Etalon | Score (1-10) |

## Naming Conventions
| Pattern | Example | Frequency |

## Directory Rules
| Rule | Path Pattern |

## Patterns (code snippets, max 3, 5-15 lines each)
### Pattern Name
` ```code```
Why: explanation

## Anti-Patterns
| Class | Problem | Fix |
```

---

## P3: Etalon Selection (1 `Plan` agent)

After all P2 agents complete, spawn 1 `Plan` agent (or the project architecture agent from `.claude/agents/`) with combined results.

**Prompt:**
```
Receive analysis from 10 layer-analysis agents. Select 1-2 etalons per layer based on:
- Highest score from candidates
- Most complete pattern coverage
- Best naming convention adherence
- Fewest anti-patterns

If same class appears as etalon for multiple layers, assign to most relevant layer.

Input: {ALL_10_AGENT_OUTPUTS}

Output:
## Final Etalon Summary
| Layer | Etalon Class | Path | Score | Role |

## Conflict Resolutions
| Class | Claimed By | Assigned To | Reason |

## Coverage Gaps
| Layer | Issue | Recommendation |
```

---

## P4: Document Generation (3 writer agents, PARALLEL)

Read `references/conventions-guide.md` for templates. Spawn 3 writer agents in ONE message — the project doc/dev agent from `.claude/agents/`, else `general-purpose`.

| # | Document | Target |
|---|----------|--------|
| 1 | `.claude/convention/reference-patterns.md` | ~300 lines -- main code layers (L4-L11, L14): etalons, patterns, anti-patterns, quick reference |
| 2 | `.claude/convention/testing-conventions.md` | ~150 lines -- test layers (T1-T6): test etalons, patterns, assertion conventions |
| 3 | `.claude/convention/project-architecture.md` | ~200 lines -- build layers (L1-L3, L12-L13): build, deps, codegen, migrations, structure |

**Per-agent prompt:**
```
Generate {DOCUMENT_NAME} following the template from conventions-guide.
Target structure: {TEMPLATE_FROM_CONVENTIONS_GUIDE}
Etalon selection: {P3_ETALON_SUMMARY}
Layer analyses: {RELEVANT_P2_OUTPUTS}
Stack: {DETECTED_STACK}
Write to: .claude/convention/{filename}.md
Frontmatter (FIRST lines of the file, before the H1) — substitute the three tokens with the values
copied verbatim from P0.3's setup JSON (`{PLUGIN_VERSION}` = its `version`, `{CONTENT_VERSION}` = its `content_version`, `{LAST_UPDATED}` = its
`last_updated`), never hardcode and never re-derive them; no token may survive into the file:
---
doc_type: llm
version: "{PLUGIN_VERSION}"
content_version: "{CONTENT_VERSION}"
generated_by: "brewcode:convention-setup"
last_updated: "{LAST_UPDATED}"
---
Structure: organized by layer -- each with Etalon Classes table, Patterns (5-15 lines each, max 3/layer), Anti-Patterns table, Quick Reference table at end.
Target: ~{LINE_COUNT} lines.
```

---

## P5: Text Optimization

The main conversation owns P5: all snapshots, fan-out, acceptance, and repairs. Wait for P4 writers
before optimizing the three documents below. Never model-invoke the DMI `/brewtools:text-optimize`
through `Skill`; read/follow its installed SKILL.md orchestration instead. Never have a writer,
organizer, or optimizer spawn another optimizer/verifier.

| Target | Mode |
|---|---|
| `.claude/convention/reference-patterns.md` | medium, 100% meaning preservation |
| `.claude/convention/testing-conventions.md` | medium, 100% meaning preservation |
| `.claude/convention/project-architecture.md` | medium, 100% meaning preservation |

If brewtools is available, resolve its installed `text-optimize/SKILL.md` and absolute
`TEXT_GUARD` (`scripts/text-guard.sh`); the convention skill's `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` is brewcode,
not brewtools. Read the canonical workflow/references; print its resolved PLAN. Snapshot all named
targets before any optimization edit, capture `RUN_DIR`, and require exit 0. Use `--allow-dirty`
only under existing authorization for these named documents; preserve unrelated work.
Replace TEXT_GUARD, RUN_DIR, FILE, REL, ANALYSIS, and TEXT_OPTIMIZE_SKILL_DIR in commands/briefs
with concrete values before execution; these are placeholders, not inherited shell variables.

```bash
bash "TEXT_GUARD" snapshot <three target paths>
```

Perform the canonical Phase 1 analysis/fact inventory; main owns the cross-file dedup decision list
(default EMPTY: keep every cross-file fact). Then spawn 3 one-file optimizers in ONE message using
this complete brief per target; substitute every path/RUN_DIR and the actual analysis before spawn:

```
Agent(subagent_type="brewtools:text-optimizer", description="Optimize one convention document", prompt="
GOAL: compact the generated project conventions without losing evidence or changing their meaning.
ROLE: own FILE only, medium/100% preservation. No nested delegation or acceptance of your own work.
SCOPE: write FILE only and its explicitly owned checkpoint/report under RUN_DIR. All other docs,
  rules, CLAUDE.md, source, and snapshots are read-only/out of bounds for writes.
CONTEXT: P4 generation completed; sibling optimizers own the other two documents. You are not alone;
  preserve concurrent work. Full Phase 1 findings/fact inventory: ANALYSIS.
  Original snapshot: RUN_DIR/orig/REL. Canonical rules/references: TEXT_OPTIMIZE_SKILL_DIR.
  D.5 decision list: EMPTY unless main provides explicit owning rows; suggest additional duplicates.
  After each known-owned atomic write, immediately run:
    bash 'TEXT_GUARD' checkpoint --run-dir 'RUN_DIR' 'FILE'
  Never checkpoint someone else's bytes or manufacture proof after failure. If current bytes
  changed concurrently, preserve them and report uncertain recovery. Never restore automatically.
CONSUMER: main independently compares ORIGINAL and CURRENT from disk before P6; later agents use
  these etalons, paths, constraints, metadata, and examples directly.
DONE: return metrics with the counting method, numbered facts labelled kept/merged/lost/distorted,
  dedup ledger, reference checks, checkpoint/report path, and unresolved conflicts. No silent loss.")
```

Main runs the canonical mechanical sub-gate after all returns:

```bash
bash "TEXT_GUARD" verify --no-restore --run-dir "RUN_DIR" <three target paths>
```

Classify every missing token as preserved meaning, an authorized change, or actual loss; a
mechanical PASS alone cannot prove semantics. For this installer, require a fresh read-only
`Agent` per document (main spawns them together) even in medium mode:

```
Agent(subagent_type="general-purpose", description="Verify convention meaning", prompt="
GOAL: independently accept or reject the convention rewrite; you did not write it.
ROLE: read-only verifier; never edit, repair, optimize, or delegate.
SCOPE: ORIGINAL=RUN_DIR/orig/REL and CURRENT=FILE only, both read from disk.
CONTEXT: medium requires 100% meaning preservation, including every number, name, path, version,
  example, prohibition, scope qualifier, and metadata field. Do not read the writer's report.
CONSUMER: main patches only owned loss or refuses optimization before P6.
DONE: numbered original facts labelled kept/merged/lost/distorted; protected-fact PASS/FAIL,
  concrete omissions/conflicts and verdict PASS|FAIL. No invented equivalence percentage.")
```

Main repairs confirmed owned loss, checkpoints each owned repair immediately, and repeats required
checks. If ownership is uncertain or preservation fails, preserve concurrent bytes and refuse
optimization acceptance; never use default verify/restore as an automatic rollback. P6 receives
only accepted documents, or an explicit pending/partial result with the reason.

If brewtools or its optimizer is unavailable, read
`${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/text-optimize-fallback.md`; main performs the same zero-loss
snapshot/inventory/checkpoint/protected-token/independent-verification contract. Missing equivalent
safeguards means leave optimization pending and report it, never silently weaken the gate.

---

## P6: User Review

Present summary:

```markdown
## Convention Documents Generated

| Document | Lines | Key Etalons (top 5) |
|----------|-------|---------------------|
| reference-patterns.md | {N} | {class1}, {class2}, ... |
| testing-conventions.md | {N} | {class1}, {class2}, ... |
| project-architecture.md | {N} | {file1}, {file2}, ... |
```

AskUserQuestion options:
- **A:** Approve all -- continue to rules extraction
- **B:** Revise -- provide feedback (max 2 iterations, re-run P5 after edits)
- **C:** Skip to rules -- jump to P7

---

## P7: Rules Organization

> SKIP in `conventions` mode — it exists to leave `.claude/rules/` untouched. Go straight to P8.

Read `references/rules-guide.md` for interactive flow.

### Step 7.1: Extract Rule Candidates

| Source Section | Rule Type |
|---------------|-----------|
| Anti-Patterns tables | avoid |
| Patterns sections | best-practice |
| Naming Conventions | best-practice |
| Constraints | avoid |

### Step 7.2: Duplicate Detection

Read existing `.claude/rules/*.md` files.

| Similarity | Action |
|------------|--------|
| >70% | Skip (already covered) |
| 40-70% | Merge into existing entry |
| <40% | New rule candidate |

### Step 7.3: Interactive Batching

Present 5-7 rules per batch via AskUserQuestion:

```markdown
## Rules Batch {N}/{TOTAL}

| # | Type | Rule | Target File |
|---|------|------|-------------|
| 1 | avoid | ... | {prefix}-avoid.md |
| 2 | bp | ... | {prefix}-best-practice.md |

Options: Accept all | Select by number | Skip batch | Stop
```

### Step 7.4: Spawn bc-rules-organizer

Spawn bc-rules-organizer per `references/rules-guide.md` Section 4 with `{ACCEPTED_RULES_JSON}`. Main collects written paths/checkpoints and runs their requested optimization through the P5 preservation contract; the organizer never delegates optimization.

---

## P7.5: Update Project CLAUDE.md

Skip unless the user explicitly requested CLAUDE.md references. Then ask once:
"Update project CLAUDE.md with etalon summary table + convention references?"
- **A:** Yes -- add etalon table + lazy-load refs
- **B:** No -- skip

If yes:
1. Read project `CLAUDE.md`
2. Find or create `## Reference Patterns & Etalon Classes` section
3. Add/update:

```markdown
## Reference Patterns & Etalon Classes
> **Full doc**: `.claude/convention/reference-patterns.md` (lazy-load when writing new code)

| When writing... | Copy from (etalon) |
|-----------------|---------------------|
| {role} | `{ClassName}` -- {key traits} |

### DTO Evolution (prefer top)
1. **{preferred}** -- PREFER for new code
2. **{established}** -- OK for complex entities
3. **{legacy}** -- AVOID
```

4. Use Edit tool -- preserve all existing CLAUDE.md content.

---

## P8: Output Summary

Finish the loading-rule lifecycle as specified above before reporting success.

```markdown
## Convention Analysis Complete

| Document | Path | Lines | Key Etalons |
|----------|------|-------|-------------|
| reference-patterns.md | `.claude/convention/reference-patterns.md` | {N} | {list} |
| testing-conventions.md | `.claude/convention/testing-conventions.md` | {N} | {list} |
| project-architecture.md | `.claude/convention/project-architecture.md` | {N} | {list} |

| When writing... | Copy from... |
|-----------------|-------------|
| {condensed top etalons} | {class} |

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Rules extracted | {X} |
| Rules applied | {Y} |
| Duplicates skipped | {Z} |

Next Steps: Review `.claude/convention/` | `/brewcode:convention-setup rules` to re-extract later | `/brewcode:convention-setup paths src/new-module` for new modules
```

---

## Error Handling

| Condition | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| No source files found | Exit: "No source files found for {STACK}" |
| `rules` mode without `.claude/convention/` | Exit: "Run `/brewcode:convention-setup conventions` first" |
| >1000 source files | Warn user, suggest `paths` mode |
| Unknown stack | Continue with generic analysis (no stack-specific layers) |
| Agent timeout | Log warning, continue with available results |
| Convention doc generation fails | Retry once, then present partial results |
| Prose argument not matching a mode keyword (e.g. "extract testing patterns") | score against the EN/RU keywords in the Mode Detection table; extract paths/target from the prose — never treat the first word as a positional mode |
| PLAN block missing, or printed after Step 0.3 already ran | defect — file it, do not ship |

</instructions>

Files in this skill

  • LICENSE1.1 KB
  • README.md3.8 KB
  • SKILL.md24.7 KB
  • references/analysis-layers.md11.2 KB
  • references/conventions-guide.md6.3 KB
  • references/rules-guide.md7 KB
  • references/text-optimize-fallback.md5.7 KB
  • scripts/convention.sh14 KB
  • tests/lifecycle.mjs7.8 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.