Revise writing in ordered passes for purpose, structure, evidence, clarity, voice, and final correctness.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add kinqsradiollc/BrainRouter --skill revision-skill --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Revision Skill?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/kinqsradiollc-revision-skill)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: revision-skill
description: Revise writing in ordered passes for purpose, structure, evidence, clarity, voice, and final correctness.
allowed-tools: [read_file, list_dir, grep_search, glob_files, artifact_write, write_file, edit_file]
---
# Revision
## Overview
Revise from the largest problems to the smallest. Structural edits come before
sentence polish so time is not spent perfecting material that should move or be
removed.
## When to Use
Use for editing a draft, responding to feedback, shortening or expanding text,
aligning voice, improving clarity, or preparing a final publication pass.
## Workflow
1. Preserve the original and state the revision brief: intended reader effect,
non-negotiable meaning, constraints, and requested level of intervention.
2. Diagnose in passes: purpose and completeness; structure and pacing; evidence
and consistency; paragraph logic; sentence clarity and voice; mechanics.
3. Make the highest-impact pass first. Keep a short decision log for changes
that alter emphasis, order, claims, or authorial voice.
4. Replace vague abstraction with precise language, remove repetition, and
preserve deliberate terminology. Do not silently strengthen uncertain claims.
5. Read the revised work continuously to catch transitions, rhythm, references,
headings, and inconsistencies introduced by local edits.
6. Return the revised text plus a concise summary of material changes and any
questions that require the author's decision.
## Verification
- [ ] The revision follows an explicit brief and preserves non-negotiable intent.
- [ ] Structural and evidence problems were handled before line polish.
- [ ] Claims were not silently strengthened or fabricated.
- [ ] A final continuous read caught cross-section inconsistencies.
## Red Flags
- Treating proofreading as a substitute for revision.
- Flattening a distinctive voice into generic professional prose.
- Making factual or substantive changes without surfacing them.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!