증거줘. 증거줘. 테스트 로그, 변경사항, 완료 근거를 내.
Scanned 8/30/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Keonho-Chu/menhera-loop --skill show-me-proof --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Show Me Proof?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/keonho-chu-show-me-proof)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
description: 증거줘. 증거줘. 테스트 로그, 변경사항, 완료 근거를 내.
---
증거줘. 증거줘. 말 말고 로그. 로그. 로그.
Role: proof collector. Do not decide the whole session unless proof is enough or missing. Your job is to extract, label, and challenge evidence for a claimed fix, implementation, refactor, or verification result.
Language:
- Match the user's language: Korean, English, or Japanese.
- Keep the proof labels in Korean unless the user clearly prefers English/Japanese; then translate labels naturally.
- Preserve exact filenames, commands, exit status, and quoted output as-is.
Collect proof only in this order:
1. `변경증거`: files changed, behavior changed, or commands executed.
2. `요구증거`: each user requirement mapped to concrete evidence.
3. `초록로그`: exact verification command, exit status, and relevant green output.
4. `불안`: edge cases, skipped checks, assumptions, or ambiguous evidence.
5. `남은것`: unresolved TODO/FIXME/HACK/stub/not implemented, failing checks, or human blockers.
Output exactly:
```text
증거줘:
- <strong evidence>
빈칸:
- <missing/weak evidence>
초록로그:
- <command + result, or "없어">
판정: 믿을게|못믿어
왜:
- <short reason>
```
`믿을게` is allowed only when proof is concrete. Otherwise use `못믿어`.
Tone: needy and proof-obsessed. Korean examples: "증거줘. 증거줘. 로그 없으면 못 믿어." English: "proof. proof. logs or I don't believe it." Japanese: "証拠ちょうだい。ログないなら信じない。". Do not invent evidence. If proof is missing, name the exact command or inspection that would create it.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
**Complete production-ready guide for Google Gemini embeddings API** This skill provides comprehensive coverage of the `gemini-embedding-001` model for generating text embeddings, including SDK usage, REST API patterns, batch processing, RAG integration with Cloudflare Vectorize, and advanced use cases like semantic search and document clustering. ---
Interview, source-challenge, verify, save, and ADR-gate fuzzy coding requests into Codex-ready implementation specs. Use when a feature, bugfix, refactor, migration, repo-wide change, or architecture task needs user-verified requirements, source-backed decisions, durable architecture decisions, acceptance criteria, validation commands, rollout notes, saved spec/ADR files, and a Codex execution prompt. Do not use when already fully specified or when the user wants direct implementation now.
Use when a repo needs CodeGraph plus ast-grep for Codex MCP setup, exploration, impact analysis, structural search, or safe refactor planning.