Run a taste evaluation on a research proposal or technical direction. Determines whether to proceed, simplify, defer, or kill before committing research effort.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Kastalien-Research/thoughtbox --skill taste --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Taste?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/kastalien-research-taste-thoughtbox)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: taste
description: Run a taste evaluation on a research proposal or technical direction. Determines whether to proceed, simplify, defer, or kill before committing research effort.
argument-hint: "[proposal or question to evaluate]"
user-invocable: true
---
Evaluate this research direction: $ARGUMENTS
## Process
### 1. Determine Evaluation Depth
Based on the proposal, select the appropriate depth:
| Situation | Operations |
|---|---|
| Vague idea, needs sharpening | Compression test only |
| Specific technical proposal | Landscape + Dead-end estimation |
| Major resource commitment | Full pipeline (all 6 operations) |
| Stuck, need fresh angles | Cross-pollination only |
| Choosing between options | Prediction query only |
### 2. Run Operations (in order, skip per above)
**Compression Test** — Force into: "We believe [X] because [Y], and if we're right, [Z] follows." If it can't survive compression, verdict is **defer**.
**Landscape Assessment** — Use WebSearch and Exa (`web_search_exa`) to find adjacent work, abandoned approaches, new capabilities. What exists? What changed recently?
**Prediction Query** — Simulate success and failure worlds. Is the direction informative under both outcomes?
**Dead-End Estimation** — What's the most likely failure mode? What's the time-to-signal (not time-to-completion)?
**Simplicity Audit** — Is there an 80%-value simpler version? Apply recursively.
**Cross-Pollination** — Check against other domains. Structural resonance = real signal.
### 3. Stop Early
If the verdict becomes clear at any step, stop. Don't run more operations just to fill out the report.
### 4. Output
```
## Taste Evaluation: [Title]
**Verdict:** proceed | simplify | defer | kill
**Rationale:** [One sentence]
**Compression:** [Single-sentence formulation]
**Landscape:** [Position relative to existing work]
**Prediction:** Success -> [X] / Failure -> [Y]
**Time-to-signal:** [Estimate]
**Simplification:** [Cheaper version, if any]
**Cross-domain:** [Analogies, if checked]
**Next step:** [Concrete action]
```
Omit unchecked sections.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!