Fuse insights from multiple knowledge sources (code, docs, memory, research, web) into coherent understanding. Use when you have scattered information that needs integration.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Synthesize?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/kastalien-research-synthesize-thoughtbox)
---
name: synthesize
description: Fuse insights from multiple knowledge sources (code, docs, memory, research, web) into coherent understanding. Use when you have scattered information that needs integration.
argument-hint: "[topic to synthesize]"
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash, WebFetch, WebSearch
---
Synthesize knowledge on this topic: $ARGUMENTS
## Process
### 1. Source Inventory
Identify relevant knowledge sources across these categories:
| Source Type | Where to Look |
|---|---|
| **Code** | Current codebase (Glob/Grep), implementation patterns, tests, comments |
| **Documentation** | Specs, READMEs, ADRs, API docs in the repo |
| **Memory** | `.Codex/` project memory, agent memory, previous learnings |
| **External research** | WebSearch, Exa for papers, blog posts, community discussion |
| **Issue history** | selected tracker or handoff entries, closed issues, decision rationale |
Scan at least 3 source types. Don't rely on a single category.
### 2. Extract & Classify
For each source, extract:
- **Claims** — specific assertions about the topic
- **Patterns** — recurring approaches or structures
- **Conflicts** — where sources disagree
- **Gaps** — what no source addresses
### 3. Integration
Three integration strategies, used as appropriate:
**Convergent** — Multiple sources agree. High confidence. Extract the common principle.
**Divergent** — Sources disagree. Analyze *why* (different contexts? different values? different data?). Don't force resolution — document the conditions under which each view applies.
**Complementary** — Sources cover different facets. Weave into a complete picture, noting which source contributed which piece.
### 4. Output
```
## Synthesis: [Topic]
### Sources Consulted
- [Source type]: [what was found]
### Convergent Findings (high confidence)
- [Finding]: supported by [sources]
### Divergent Findings (context-dependent)
- [Claim A] (applies when [X]) vs. [Claim B] (applies when [Y])
### Gaps
- [What no source addressed]
### Integrated Understanding
[Coherent narrative combining all sources — the actual synthesis]
### Confidence Assessment
[Overall confidence and what would increase it]
### Actionable Next Steps
[What to do with this understanding]
```
