Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Rpi Fix Ci

ASecurity

Diagnose existing CI failures and repair their root causes locally with regression evidence and complete verification before any authorized publication.

5 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 10/4/2026
ai-agentsdebuggingdatabase

Security Analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned 10/4/2026

$npx -y skills add juan294/cc-rpi --skill rpi-fix-ci --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Rpi Fix Ci?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Rpi Fix Ci
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/juan294-rpi-fix-ci/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/juan294-rpi-fix-ci)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: "rpi-fix-ci"
description: "Diagnose existing CI failures and repair their root causes locally with regression evidence and complete verification before any authorized publication."
argument-hint: "[request]"
disable-model-invocation: true
---
The request is supplied as literal arguments: $ARGUMENTS


# Repair Existing CI Failures

Use the failed run/candidate and authorized repair scope in the request. Read
controlling instructions, test contracts and the [durable handoff](references/handoff.md)
completely. Revalidate the actual worktree, branch and failed commit before reusing
prior diagnoses or check results. Keep repairs in an owned local branch/worktree.

## Process

1. Identify the exact failed run and candidate. Inspect existing runs with
   `gh run list --branch <branch> --commit <sha> --json databaseId,headSha,conclusion,status,name`.
   Missing or pending checks are not passes. If there is no failure, report and stop.
2. Read existing failure logs with `gh run view <run-id> --log-failed`. Locate the
   failed command and enough surrounding output to explain it; a truncated tail
   alone may omit the cause. Do not rerun hosted jobs to collect evidence.
3. Inventory test, typecheck, lint and build failures, then group them by likely
   root cause and affected file ownership. One cause breaking many tests is one
   investigation, with every affected test retained in its verification scope.
4. Keep narrow repairs with the parent. Delegate useful independent local work
   only within the current authorized phase. Each assignment states objective,
   permitted actions/files, evidence/output, resource constraints and completion
   condition. Keep at most three simultaneous implementers; available slots and
   tool contention may require fewer. One integration owner inspects every result;
   a missing or failed assignment remains an explicit unresolved gap.
5. Reproduce each cause locally. Read the failing test and relevant implementation
   to the depth needed; reuse valid prior reads. For behavioral defects, first
   confirm an existing regression fails or write and run a failing regression that
   captures the invariant, then make the minimum correct fix. Executable CI/config
   behavior needs a regression oracle too. Never weaken or delete a valid test to
   obtain a pass. Use appropriate deterministic checks for non-behavioral edits.
6. Run targeted checks sequentially after each fix. Preserve every command's
   status. A flaky failure remains unresolved until evidence explains it; a local
   pass alone cannot erase the reported CI failure.
7. Obtain independent review of cause, changes, regression coverage and all known
   failure dispositions. Inspect every required reviewer result; missing review
   blocks acceptance. Repair confirmed findings, record false-positive evidence
   and surface only unresolved architecture/new-scope decisions for a new decision.
8. Run the native simplify pass or Codex simplify helper on changed files, then
   the complete local CI-equivalent gate, including applicable tests, coverage,
   typechecks, lint and build. Sequence resource-intensive checks and preserve all
   exits. Repeat diagnosis for new failures while meaningful local progress is
   possible; if an external dependency or new decision blocks progress, report the
   concrete unresolved cause and next action instead of claiming completion.
9. Save the durable handoff with every failure's disposition, changed scope and
   exact check/candidate identity. Commit with a factual conventional message and
   integrate the completed verified change locally. Verify branch identity first.
   Inspect hosted triggers before any single authorized integration push; never
   create Previews, publish working branches, rerun hosted jobs or use a fix-and-
   repush debugging loop. Production publication needs its own explicit authority.

Complete implement -> independent review -> repair -> simplify -> verify within
the authorized phase, then stop for its required acceptance unless continuation
was already supplied. Preserve unresolved diagnostics and all owned artifacts
before worktree cleanup. A local repair does not make an earlier remote run green.

Attribution

juan294juan294
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from juan294 →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698461 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →