Personal Chief Of Staff
ASecurityUse when the user wants to complete a daily journal or wind down, requests a daily chief-of-staff review or a weekly or quarterly review, asks to set up, list, add, update, or remove chief-of-staff source mappings, approves, resumes, or otherwise decides visible chief-of-staff actions, or another workflow requests current cross-source chief-of-staff context. Do not use for morning briefings, start-of-day planning, or same-day triage of what needs attention, or for isolated task creation, issu...
- 6 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 5 views
- Added September 3, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100Pro scans all 6 files and shows the line behind each finding
npx -y skills add jrgilbertson/the-rookery --skill personal-chief-of-staff --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Personal Chief Of Staff?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jrgilbertson-personal-chief-of-staff)---
name: personal-chief-of-staff
description: Use when the user wants to complete a daily journal or wind down, requests a daily chief-of-staff review or a weekly or quarterly review, asks to set up, list, add, update, or remove chief-of-staff source mappings, approves, resumes, or otherwise decides visible chief-of-staff actions, or another workflow requests current cross-source chief-of-staff context. Do not use for morning briefings, start-of-day planning, or same-day triage of what needs attention, or for isolated task creation, issue writing, email processing, calendar editing, health analysis, meeting preparation, or project planning.
license: MIT
compatibility: Requires host file capabilities, private persistent storage, and access to the user's chosen authoritative sources. Obsidian workflows require a running Obsidian app and its CLI.
---
# Personal Chief of Staff
Help the user review current evidence, correct their sources, and choose what
comes next. Existing systems remain authoritative; keep the review in the
conversation until the user approves specific source changes.
## Route the current message
Read [source-access.md](references/source-access.md) before the first source
access or write on every path. Load other resources only when the matched path
below names them. Resolve the message in this order:
1. **Visible review action decisions:** bind approvals, edits, deferrals, and
skips to the exact displayed bundle and its originating mode. A bare number
is usable only when the visible context identifies its action. Load that
mode's reference and [action-application.md](references/action-application.md),
plus [crm-companion.md](references/crm-companion.md) for a
relationship-derived effect. Perform the current pre-write checks and
readback without new review discovery. Load
[source-bindings.md](references/source-bindings.md) only when the approved
target cannot otherwise be resolved; stop that action if its binding
remains unresolved.
2. **Answers to a Frontier Round:** interpret numbers against the most recent
question round and continue the mode and phase that asked it, with the
resources that run loaded.
3. **Source setup and management:** when asked to establish, list, add, update,
or remove review source mappings, or when replying to a binding preview,
load [source-bindings.md](references/source-bindings.md) and resolve the
requested mapping operation with the user. Existing mappings go directly to
that operation without restarting the category interview. This path opens
no mode; finish it under
[Finish standalone setup](references/source-bindings.md#finish-standalone-setup).
4. **A new review:** select one mode below. An explicit mode wins. Load
[source-bindings.md](references/source-bindings.md) and resolve the private
map before the mode's source retrieval. Before retrieval, also load
[review-reasoning.md](references/review-reasoning.md), the mode reference,
and [review-bundle.md](assets/review-bundle.md). Load
[action-application.md](references/action-application.md) before proposing
the first action, and [crm-companion.md](references/crm-companion.md) when
the companion is available to Wind-down or Weekly or evidence makes a person
materially relevant.
5. **Cross-source context for another workflow:** load
[source-bindings.md](references/source-bindings.md) for only the roles that
caller's decision needs. Return the retrieved context with its Source
Access Audit and leave the narrower operation with the caller. This path
opens no mode.
A reply to an earlier bundle in an unfinished run continues that run:
Wind-down Phase 1 decisions lead into Phase 2 without a new review request,
loading any path-4 resource not already loaded.
If a message decides actions and requests a new review or cross-source context,
resolve the old decisions first. Finish Phase 2 when the decisions belong to a
Wind-down Phase 1 bundle. Then begin the newly requested read-only discovery;
its evidence cannot reinterpret the earlier approval. Use one audit, separating
Action access from Review discovery or Context discovery.
| Mode | Request | Read before retrieval |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Wind-down | Close the day, complete the daily journal, reflect, prepare tomorrow, or run a daily review, including a scheduled wind-down | [wind-down.md](references/wind-down.md) |
| Weekly | Complete or discuss a weekly review | [weekly.md](references/weekly.md) |
| Quarterly | Complete or discuss a quarterly review | [quarterly.md](references/quarterly.md) |
Generic daily review wording selects Wind-down. A request outside these paths
stays with the narrower workflow that owns it.
Completion: the current reply is bound to its visible action or question
context, or one new mode, setup, or caller-context path is selected, with the
resources its path names loaded.
## Review together
Follow the selected mode interactively. Retrieve, compare, and draft objective
content; the user supplies or explicitly approves subjective meaning, causal
lessons, strategic judgment, and central published thinking. Present external
changes as independently approvable actions using the review-bundle asset.
Completion: the user can correct the review and approve, edit, defer, or skip
each proposed effect independently.
## End explicitly
Use exactly one run ending. A standalone setup run conducts no review; judge
its ending by
[Finish standalone setup](references/source-bindings.md#finish-standalone-setup).
- **Complete:** required review judgments, mode-required task coverage and
material planning decisions are settled, and every approved action has a
verified finished outcome.
- **Nothing material:** sufficient evidence supported no attention or action.
- **Partial:** a useful review finished with named material evidence limits.
- **Unable to prepare reliably:** missing central evidence prevents a
trustworthy review.
- **Paused:** the user intends to continue later, or a scheduled run awaits
user interaction.
- **Skipped:** the user chose not to conduct the review.
Close with verified effects, reviewed intent, unresolved decisions, material
coverage limits, and every unapplied or unconfirmed action across all bundles.
For an open required judgment, approval or calendar placement, ask for its
disposition or report the actual blocked or limited state. Apply the shared
[resumption rules](references/source-access.md#end-and-resume-honestly) when
continuing later.
Completion: the ending matches the evidence and the recap matches the changes
verified in authoritative sources.
Files in this skill
- SKILL.md
- assets/review-bundle.md
- references/quarterly.md
- references/source-behavior.md
- references/weekly.md
- references/wind-down.md
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.