Write Evidence Backed Profile

---
name: write-evidence-backed-profile
description: Draft bios, applications, portfolio introductions, proposal introductions, cover notes, and professional profile copy from approved evidence without inventing experience or results. Use when a user wants personal or company positioning tailored to an audience, role, opportunity, directory, portfolio, proposal, or public profile and factual grounding matters.
---

# Write Evidence-Backed Profile

Create audience-specific profile writing from an approved evidence set. Prefer a smaller defensible story over a broad invented persona.

## 1. Define the writing task

- Confirm the audience, channel, prompt or field, word or character limit, desired action, and tone.
- Identify the claims the user expects the draft to communicate.
- Read [references/channel-output-rules.md](references/channel-output-rules.md) for the selected format.
- Preserve exact names, links, titles, dates, and wording supplied for the current task.

## 2. Build or inspect the evidence pack

- Use [assets/evidence-pack-template.md](assets/evidence-pack-template.md) when the user has not supplied a structured source set.
- Use public sources and user-approved facts only.
- Verify current pages when roles, availability, metrics, projects, credentials, services, or positioning may have changed.
- Treat inaccessible sources and unsupported user expectations as unverified.
- Do not embed a specific person's identity, CV, website, source registry, or voice guide in the skill.

## 3. Map evidence to the audience

For each important requested claim, record:

- the evidence that supports it
- whether it is direct experience, adjacent experience, interpretation, or unsupported
- why it matters to this audience
- the strongest wording the evidence permits

Do not infer job titles, customer relationships, years of experience, technical depth, revenue, performance, availability, awards, or credentials from weak signals.

## 4. Write the strongest honest version

- Lead with the most relevant supported overlap between the evidence and the audience's need.
- Present adjacent experience as adjacent, not direct expertise.
- Use concrete public work when it improves credibility.
- Omit unsupported claims instead of filling gaps with generic confidence.
- Avoid inflated certainty, unsupported superlatives, fabricated enthusiasm, and irrelevant capability lists.
- Match the requested format so the result is ready for human review and use.

## 5. Complete the evidence check

- Verify every name, title, date, link, metric, project description, and factual statement used.
- List requested claims that were qualified or omitted and explain the evidence gap briefly.
- Keep sensitive or user-approved non-public material out of reusable examples and public artifacts.
- Never submit a form, send a message, edit a public profile, or publish the draft.

Return the compact evidence map, finished draft, qualifications, omitted claims, sources checked, and any fact that still needs confirmation.