Skip to content
Back to skills

Delivery Orchestrator

ASecurity

Decompose an epic into atomic parallelizable tasks, route each to the right skill, and keep the four delivery records straight — issues, STATUS, ROADMAP, CHANGELOG. Use as a meta-router when several skills could apply, and as the baseline for how delivery state is recorded. Trigger at the start of any multi-track epic, when the skill count exceeds ~12, or when the records have drifted from reality.

  • 12 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 5 views
  • Added August 31, 2026
ai-agentsrustgorailsawsgcpazuretestinggitapifrontend

Works with

  • api
  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 22, 2026

npx -y skills add jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience --skill delivery-orchestrator --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Delivery Orchestrator?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Delivery Orchestrator
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jpantsjoha-delivery-orchestrator/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jpantsjoha-delivery-orchestrator)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: delivery-orchestrator
description: Decompose an epic into atomic parallelizable tasks, route each to the right skill, and keep the four delivery records straight — issues, STATUS, ROADMAP, CHANGELOG. Use as a meta-router when several skills could apply, and as the baseline for how delivery state is recorded. Trigger at the start of any multi-track epic, when the skill count exceeds ~12, or when the records have drifted from reality.
---

# Delivery Orchestrator

> **A skill for choosing skills.** Once your harness grows past a handful of skills, the agent needs a way to select the right one. This is that skill.

The orchestrator has three jobs: decompose work into the smallest independently executable units,
route each unit to the skill that owns it, and **keep the delivery records honest** — because a
plan nobody can trust is worse than no plan, and it takes longer to discover.

## When to use

- Starting a new epic or multi-track piece of work
- When an agent is about to attempt everything in one context window
- When parallel execution across multiple agents is needed
- When you need to decide which skill applies to an incoming task
- **When the records have drifted** — a status file that stops before today's work, a roadmap
  asking for a decision already made, a tracker claiming `gated` with nothing that walks it

## The delivery records — the baseline

**One fact, one owner.** Four artefacts carry delivery state, and each answers exactly one
question. Full doctrine, including the issue template and the audit: `docs/DELIVERY-RECORDS.md`.

| Record | The one question it answers | Written when |
|---|---|---|
| **GitHub issues** | *What exactly is this work, and how will we know it is done?* | Before the first line of code |
| **`STATUS.md`** | *What is happening now, and what waits on whom?* | One entry per working session |
| **`ROADMAP.md`** | *What are we building toward, in what order?* | When a milestone or the plan changes |
| **`CHANGELOG.md`** | *What shipped — proven, tested?* | When user-visible work merges |

The four rules that keep them from drifting:

1. **`ROADMAP` owns build order.** Where another document disagrees about what is next, the
   roadmap wins.
2. **`CHANGELOG` records the proven, not the intended.** A changelog of intentions reads as
   evidence, which makes it worse than none.
3. **An issue not filed is not started.** The tracker is current *before* the code, because the
   failure this prevents is work that accretes from a small fix and is reconciled afterwards,
   if at all.
4. **`gated` means a test proves a user can reach it; `shipped` means a person used it.** These
   two are the ones routinely overclaimed. Code existing is `built`, and deployment is not
   shipping.

## Procedure

### Part 1 — Decomposition

1. **Read the spec or brief** — confirm a feature spec or HLD exists. If not, invoke `spec-first-delivery` first.
2. **Identify tracks** — group work into independent tracks (e.g. backend API, frontend, infrastructure, testing). Tracks can run in parallel. Dependencies between tracks must be explicit.
3. **Break each track into atomic tasks** — an atomic task is one that:
   - Can be assigned to a single agent
   - Has a clear input and a clear output
   - Does not require coordination with another concurrent task to complete
   - Can be validated independently
4. **Sequence dependencies** — where task B requires output from task A, mark the dependency. Everything else is parallel.
5. **Assign context boundaries** — each agent gets only the context it needs. Avoid stuffing all specs into every agent's context.

### Part 2 — Skill routing

1. **Map each task to a skill** using the routing table below. If no skill matches exactly, use the closest and note the gap.
2. **Validate integration after parallel work** — run the full regression suite (`make check` or the project's equivalent convergence command) after all parallel tracks complete. Parallel work that skips integration validation is not done.

## Skill routing table

| Task type | Route to skill |
|---|---|
| New feature / epic planning | `spec-first-delivery` |
| Architecture decision or trade-off | `the-architect` |
| High-stakes design review | `adversarial-gate` |
| Pre-deployment go/no-go | `release-readiness` |
| Release process governance, SemVer, ADR, changelog | `release-manager` |
| Enterprise policy, compliance, or governance alignment | `governance-guardrail` |
| GitHub repo operations: CI triggers, billing, issues, labels, branch protection | `github-manager` |
| Google ADK agent patterns | `adk-expert` |
| Cloud infrastructure guardrails (GCP, AWS, Azure, Alibaba Cloud) | `cloud-expert` |
| MCP server design or governance | `mcp-server-scaffold` |
| Agent output validation | `domain-validator` |
| PR or code review | `pr-reviewer` |
| LLM cost or model selection | `cost-guardrail` |
| Status or standup synthesis | `sitrep` |
| Plugin-directory, marketplace, or curated-list submission | `plugin-submission` |
| New repo or operating model install / repair | `operating-model-bootstrap` |
| Delivery controls: source of truth, issue/PR conventions, DoD, escalation | `delivery-orchestrator` (own it here) |
| An agreed goal to pursue autonomously to a merged outcome | `get-it-done` |
| Developer-machine contention, orphaned automation browsers, cloud-sync stalls | `system-performance-guardrail` |
| Read-only SRE checkup of a GCP project: probes, status table, one `OVERALL:` line | `cloud-checkup` |
| Frontend performance measurement: Core Web Vitals, traces, Lighthouse, heap growth | `frontend-performance-audit` |
| Routing this list | `delivery-orchestrator` (you are here) |

## Outputs

- Task breakdown: tracks, atomic tasks, dependencies
- Skill routing: task → skill mapping
- Parallel execution plan with integration validation step
- A brief orchestration summary for the human lead

## Guardrails

- **Atomic means independently validatable.** If you cannot describe how to verify a task in isolation, it is not atomic — split it further or merge it with its dependency.
- **Parallel agents must not share mutable state without a coordination strategy.** If two tracks write to the same file or schema, they are not independent. Use worktrees or serialise them.
- **Integration validation is not optional.** Parallel work that skips the post-merge regression check is not complete.
- **Keep agent context lean.** Each agent gets its task spec and relevant ADRs, not the entire repo.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.