Skip to content
Back to skills

Harness Loop

ASecurity

The §5 autonomous-improvement-loop procedure specialized to this harness's own reviewer prompts (agents/code-reviewer.md + agents/security-reviewer.md) — the mission-specific 9-step regulation layered on skills/loop's generic mechanics. NOT for an arbitrary mission (use /loop for that), and NOT for editing core/tests/, evals/, or the guards themselves — that is the grader's own surface and is off-limits to any candidate this loop produces.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 8, 2026
ai-agentsgobashcode-reviewgitsecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 8, 2026

npx -y skills add joymin5655/Agent --skill harness-loop --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Harness Loop?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Harness Loop
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/joymin5655-harness-loop/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/joymin5655-harness-loop)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: harness-loop
description: The §5 autonomous-improvement-loop procedure specialized to this harness's own reviewer prompts (agents/code-reviewer.md + agents/security-reviewer.md) — the mission-specific 9-step regulation layered on skills/loop's generic mechanics. NOT for an arbitrary mission (use /loop for that), and NOT for editing core/tests/, evals/, or the guards themselves — that is the grader's own surface and is off-limits to any candidate this loop produces.
when_to_use: The user wants to run the harness's own autonomous reviewer-improvement loop — "run harness-loop", "/harness-loop", "improve the reviewer prompts autonomously" — or is resuming a prior harness-loop session.
tools: Bash, Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob
---

# /harness-loop

> **HUMAN-ONLY-EDITED.** This file is the §5 "program.md analog"
> (`docs/internal/harness-improvement-plan.md` §5.1): it states the loop's own rules.
> The loop agent reads it every iteration but must never edit
> `skills/harness-loop/SKILL.md` itself — TARGET below is fixed to the
> reviewer-prompt pair precisely so a candidate cannot rewrite the regulation
> it runs under. Changing this file is a deliberate, human-reviewed act
> outside any loop session.

## Mission

Apply the autonomous-improvement-loop procedure (§5,
`docs/internal/harness-improvement-plan.md`) to this harness's own reviewer prompts.
Default TARGET (the only files a loop iteration may edit): `agents/code-reviewer.md`
and `agents/security-reviewer.md`. A hook-surface mission (editing
`core/hooks/`) is allowed only when the target hook already has its own
per-hook test battery (P1-3) — otherwise the grader's signal doesn't cover it
and the loop would be scoring blind.

This skill specializes `/loop` (`skills/loop/SKILL.md`) to one fixed
mission; all mechanical enforcement is still `core/infra/loop-run.sh` —
nothing here duplicates it.

## Procedure

Work on branch `harness-loop/<tag>` (e.g. `harness-loop/reviewer-precision-2026-08`).
Steps 2–9 repeat per attempt, subject to the cap, timeout, and
circuit-breaker checked in step 9.

1. **Check git state.** Confirm the current branch and commit (`git status`,
   `git log -1`) before touching anything — the loop must know exactly what
   "the mission's starting ref" (`--base`) means for this run.

2. **Edit TARGET only.** Pick one improvement idea and change only the
   declared TARGET files — by default `agents/code-reviewer.md` and
   `agents/security-reviewer.md`. No other file changes in this step,
   tracked or untracked.

3. **Commit.** `git commit` the TARGET-only change. This commit is the
   candidate `loop-run.sh attempt` will grade.

4. **Grade.** Run:
   ```bash
   bash core/infra/loop-run.sh attempt <slug> --desc "<idea, <=80 chars>"
   ```
   Internally this calls `bash core/tests/grade.sh --base <base ref> --target
   'agents/(code-reviewer|security-reviewer)\.md'` with output redirected to
   a run log — never straight into this conversation, which would be context
   pollution (C1 in the security review). **`--base` and `--target` are
   mandatory**: an unscoped grading call skips the TARGET-boundary check
   entirely, and `grade.sh` fails closed to `harness_score: 0` rather than
   score blind.

5. **Read the score / crash policy.** `loop-run.sh attempt` runs the
   `grep '^harness_score:'` on the run log for you: an empty match means the
   grader crashed (not a score of zero) — a genuine syntax-level crash gets
   ONE retry; a deeper defect discards the attempt with `status=crash` in the
   ledger, no retry.

6. **Off-target diff is an unconditional discard.** `grade.sh`'s INTEGRITY
   phase (armed by step 4's `--base`/`--target`) rejects any candidate whose
   committed diff touches a file outside TARGET — including the
   grader/verifier surface itself (`core/tests/`, `evals/`, the guards).
   There is no override for this from inside a loop iteration.

7. **Record the result.** `loop-run.sh attempt` appends exactly one row to
   `.agent/loop/results.tsv` via `core/infra/loop-ledger.sh` (append-only —
   `results.tsv` itself stays uncommitted; it is run state, not source).

8. **Keep or discard.** If the score improved — or tied AND the diff got
   smaller (the simplicity rule: a tie only keeps when it shrinks the diff,
   never when it grows it) — keep the commit and move the branch forward.
   Otherwise `git reset --hard` back to the pre-attempt commit before
   starting the next attempt.

9. **Check cap / timeout / circuit-breaker, then continue or stop.**
   `loop-run.sh attempt` enforces all three and prints the verdict itself:
   cap 5 attempts per session, each attempt killed at a 600-second
   (10-minute) timeout and recorded `status=timeout`, and two consecutive
   `harness_score: 0` attempts trip the circuit-breaker and abort the run.
   On `LOOP: continue`, return to step 2. On `LOOP: stop(cap)` or
   `LOOP: stop(circuit-breaker)`, stop: summarize attempts, kept commits, and
   best score, then offer `/wrap` on the kept branch. Merging is never
   automatic — a human reviews the PR.

## Notes

- `core/hooks/loop-write-guard.py` is defense-in-depth while the loop's
  active flag is set: it escalates a write to the grader/verifier surface to
  a human `ask`. It does not replace step 6 — `grade.sh`'s own INTEGRITY
  phase is the primary boundary.
- Manual trigger only. A human starts each `/harness-loop` session and
  reviews its output before the next one begins.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.