Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Testing Cycle

ASecurity

Process a single user testing feedback item — classify, fix or log, verify, and report.

7 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/22/2026
ai-agentsbashtesting

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/22/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add joris887/exosuit --skill testing-cycle --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Testing Cycle?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Testing Cycle
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/joris887-testing-cycle/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/joris887-testing-cycle)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: testing-cycle
version: 2.4.0
description: Process a single user testing feedback item — classify, fix or log, verify, and report.
trigger: manual
depends-on: []
references: []
disable-model-invocation: true
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash, Edit, Write
argument-hint: "<feedback-description>"
---
______________________________________________________________________

## testing-cycle

Processing feedback: **$ARGUMENTS**

## Phase 1: Classify Feedback

Analyze the feedback and assign a classification:

| Type            | Indicators                                           | Effort  |
| --------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | ------- |
| Bug (Critical)  | Functionality broken, crash, data loss, core feature | High    |
| Bug (Minor)     | UI glitch, cosmetic, edge case, non-blocking         | Low     |
| Gap             | Missing feature, expected capability not implemented | Backlog |
| Test Correction | Automated test tests wrong behavior, false positive  | Medium  |
| Enhancement     | UX improvement, better wording, nice-to-have         | Varies  |

**Present the classification to the user for confirmation before proceeding.**

Show:

- **Feedback**: (original, quoted)
- **Classification**: \[type\]
- **Rationale**: (why this classification)
- **Proposed action**: (what will be done)

Wait for user confirmation. They may reclassify.

## Phase 2: Act by Type

### Bug (Critical)

1. **Investigate**: Find relevant code, understand the root cause
   - Search for related files using the feedback keywords
   - Read the relevant source files
   - Check if there's an existing test covering this behavior
1. **Test first**:
   - If a test exists but tests the wrong thing → fix the test first (it should now fail)
   - If no test exists → write a failing test that captures the bug
   - Run the test to confirm it fails
1. **Fix the code**: Make the minimal change to fix the bug
1. **Verify tests pass**: Run the project's test command (from CLAUDE.md)
1. **Ask user to verify**: "Can you verify this fix in the running app?"
1. **Commit**: `fix(scope): description`

### Bug (Minor)

1. **Identify** the issue in code
1. **Fix** the code (minimal change)
1. **Add test** only if the behavior is non-trivial or regression-prone
1. **Run** the project's test command
1. **Commit**: `fix(scope): description`

### Gap

1. **Document** the gap clearly
1. **Write a user story** with:
   - Type, estimated effort
   - Description explaining what's missing and why it matters
   - INVEST-style acceptance criteria
   - Technical notes if relevant
1. **Add to** the appropriate backlog file in `docs/reference/backlog/`:
   - Add the story section (use next available story number)
   - Update the summary table
1. **Update** `docs/reference/BACKLOG_INDEX.md` if a new story was added
1. **Do NOT implement** — this is scope control
1. **Report** what was logged

### Test Correction

1. **Find** the problematic test
1. **Understand** the correct behavior from user feedback
1. **Fix the test** to match correct behavior
1. **Run the corrected test** — if it now fails, also fix the code
1. **Run** the project's test command
1. **Commit**: `test(scope): correct [description]` (add `fix` prefix if code also changed)

### Enhancement

1. **Evaluate scope**:
   - Trivial (< 10 lines, obvious improvement) → ask user if should fix now
   - Larger → create backlog story (same process as Gap)
1. **Act accordingly**:
   - If fixing now: implement, test, commit as `feat(scope):` or `fix(scope):`
   - If deferring: log to backlog and report

## Phase 3: Verify

After any code change:

1. Run the project's test command (from CLAUDE.md) to verify all tests pass
1. If the app is running, ask the user: "Can you verify this in the running app?"
1. If tests fail, fix the issue before proceeding

## Phase 4: Report

Present a summary:

```markdown
### Feedback Processed

**Feedback:** [original feedback]
**Classification:** [type]
**Action taken:** [what was done]
**Files modified:** [list of files]
**Tests:** [added/modified/none] — tests [pass/fail]
**Commit:** [hash and message] (or "logged to backlog as [story-ID]" for gaps)

Ready for next feedback item (`/testing-cycle <feedback>`) or finish testing.
```

Attribution

joris887joris887
View sourceMore from joris887 →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →