Incremental code logic verification of UAT test cases — pick batch, trace code, fix issues, update tracking.
Scanned 9/22/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add joris887/exosuit --skill claude-sense-check --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Claude Sense Check?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/joris887-claude-sense-check)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: claude-sense-check
version: 3.4.0
description: Incremental code logic verification of UAT test cases — pick batch, trace code, fix issues, update tracking.
trigger: manual
depends-on: [story-cycle]
references: [references/issue-classification.md]
disable-model-invocation: true
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash, Edit, Write
---
______________________________________________________________________
## claude-sense-check
Performing incremental Claude Sense Check on UAT backlog.
## Phase 1: Read Current State
1. Find the UAT tracking file: check for `docs/testing/UAT_COVERAGE.md`, `docs/testing/UAT_INDEX.md`, or `docs/testing/uat/` directory
2. Scan for **Claude Sense Check** sections in every test case
3. Build a work queue: cases where `- [ ] Logic verified from code perspective` is unchecked
4. Skip cases where the checkbox is already `[x]`
5. If all cases are checked, report "All UAT cases have been sense-checked" and stop
## Phase 2: Pick Next Batch
From the unchecked cases, sorted by priority (critical > high > medium > low), then by ID within each priority level:
1. Select 2-5 cases that share the same module, feature area, or user flow
2. Present to the user:
- **Batch**: which cases (e.g., UAT-005, UAT-006, UAT-007)
- **Area**: the functional area they belong to
- **Rationale**: why they belong together
- **Relevant files**: source files and components expected to be involved
3. Proceed after presenting (no user confirmation needed — this is a code-only check)
## Phase 3: Gather Context
Before checking any logic, collect the full picture for the batch's feature area:
1. Read all source files relevant to the batch
2. Trace the data flow for the feature area end-to-end
3. Note dependencies, shared state, API contracts, and external integrations
4. Read existing tests for the relevant code — they reveal intent and edge cases
5. Check the **Covers** field on each test case to identify which backlog stories are involved
6. Read the story acceptance criteria from the relevant epic/backlog file
Do NOT proceed to logic checks until you have the full picture.
## Phase 4: Code Logic Check (per case)
For each case in the batch:
1. Read the test case steps and acceptance criteria carefully
2. Trace each step through the actual source code
3. For each acceptance criterion, verify:
- The code path exists and is reachable
- Conditionals are correct (no off-by-one, no inverted logic)
- Data flows correctly between components
- Error handling covers the expected failure modes
- Edge cases mentioned in the test case are handled
4. Assign a verdict with confidence (high = full code path traced, medium = partial trace or complex logic, low = inference without full trace):
- **Pass** (high/medium/low) — logic is correct, code handles the scenario properly
- **Warning** (high/medium/low) — potential issue found, describe with file:line reference
- **Fail** (high/medium/low) — confirmed broken, describe with file:line reference and root cause
## Phase 5: Resolve Issues
For every Warning or Fail verdict, classify and act. Read `references/issue-classification.md` for the full classification guide (quick fix vs design gap).
## Phase 6: Update Tracking
### Per-case: Update the UAT tracking file
For each case in the batch:
1. Check the **Claude Sense Check** checkbox: `- [x] Logic verified from code perspective`
2. Fill in the Notes line with verdict and what was checked or fixed:
- Pass: `"Pass (high) — verified [what was checked], code handles [scenario] correctly"`
- Fixed: `"Fixed (high) — [issue description], resolved in [commit-hash]"`
- Design gap: `"Warning (medium) -> [story-id] — [gap description], backlog story created"`
### Per-area: Update UAT index
After updating the tracking file, update any status summary tables to reflect the new sense-check counts.
## Phase 7: Report & Hand Off
Output a summary:
```markdown
### Claude Sense Check Complete
**Batch:** UAT-### to UAT-### ([area name])
**Results:**
| Case | Title | Verdict | Confidence | Notes |
| ---- | ----- | ------- | ---------- | ----- |
| UAT-### | [title] | Pass/Warning/Fixed | high/medium/low | [one-line summary] |
**Fixes Applied:** [count]
- [commit-hash]: [one-line description] (for UAT-###)
**Backlog Stories Created:** [count]
- [story-id]: [one-line description] (for UAT-###)
**Progress:** [x]/[total] UAT cases sense-checked
**Remaining:** [count] cases unchecked
**Suggested Next Batch:** UAT-### to UAT-### ([area name]) — [why]
```
Include a YAML block for machine-parseable results:
```yaml
sense_check:
batch: [UAT-###, UAT-###]
area: "[area name]"
results:
- id: UAT-###
verdict: pass
confidence: high
notes: "[one-line]"
fixes: 0
stories_created: 0
progress: "X/Y"
```
## Rules
- Never re-check an already checked case
- Never check more than 5 cases in one run — stay focused
- Always update the tracking file before finishing — the checkboxes are the source of truth
- Always gather full context before starting logic checks — no guessing
- Always use `/story-cycle` for fixes — maintain TDD discipline
- Follow coding standards in `docs/reference/CODING_STANDARDS.md`
- Follow verification rules: run the project's test command before claiming fixes are complete
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!