Skip to content
Back to skills

Afrexai Ma Diligence

ASecurity

Run a structured due diligence analysis on any acquisition target. Covers financial, operational, technology, legal, cultural, and AI/automation readiness dimensions.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 18, 2026
businessgoawsgitapisecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 18, 2026

npx -y skills add johnalbertini14-glitch/openclaw-skills --skill afrexai-ma-diligence --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Afrexai Ma Diligence?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Afrexai Ma Diligence
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/johnalbertini14-glitch-afrexai-ma-diligence/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/johnalbertini14-glitch-afrexai-ma-diligence)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

SKILL.md
# M&A Due Diligence — AI-Augmented Assessment

Run a structured due diligence analysis on any acquisition target. Covers financial, operational, technology, legal, cultural, and AI/automation readiness dimensions.

## When to Use
- Evaluating an acquisition target
- Preparing sell-side due diligence materials
- Assessing a merger partner
- Running post-LOI deep dive
- Investor or board due diligence request

## How to Use

Tell your agent: "Run M&A due diligence on [Company Name]" or "Prepare due diligence for acquiring [target]."

The agent will walk through each dimension below and produce a scored assessment with red flags, deal-breakers, and a go/no-go recommendation.

## Due Diligence Framework

### 1. Financial Health (Weight: 30%)

**Revenue Quality Score (0-100)**
| Factor | Weight | Check |
|--------|--------|-------|
| Revenue concentration | 25% | Top client <15% of revenue = green, >30% = red |
| Recurring vs one-time | 25% | >70% recurring = green, <40% = red |
| Revenue growth trend | 20% | 3-year CAGR >15% = green, declining = red |
| Gross margin | 15% | >60% SaaS / >40% services = green |
| Cash conversion | 15% | Operating cash flow / EBITDA >80% = green |

**Financial Red Flags**
- Revenue recognized before delivery
- Related-party transactions >5% of revenue
- Working capital deteriorating quarter-over-quarter
- Customer acquisition cost (CAC) payback >18 months
- Deferred revenue declining while bookings "grow"
- Off-balance-sheet liabilities or operating leases hiding debt

**Valuation Sanity Check**
| Metric | Healthy Range | Danger Zone |
|--------|---------------|-------------|
| EV/Revenue | 3-8x (SaaS), 1-3x (services) | >15x without hypergrowth |
| EV/EBITDA | 10-20x | >30x |
| Price/FCF | 15-25x | >40x or negative FCF |
| Net debt/EBITDA | <2x | >4x |

### 2. Technology & Product (Weight: 20%)

**Tech Stack Assessment**
- Architecture: Monolith vs microservices vs serverless
- Technical debt score: deployment frequency, change failure rate, MTTR
- Security posture: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration test recency
- Scalability: Can 10x current load without rewrite?
- AI/Agent readiness: API-first? Automation potential?
- IP ownership: Clean IP assignments from all contributors?

**Product-Market Fit Signals**
- Net Revenue Retention >110% = strong PMF
- Logo churn <5% annually = healthy
- NPS >40 = good, >60 = excellent
- Organic growth % of total = true demand signal

### 3. Legal & Compliance (Weight: 15%)

**Legal Checklist**
- [ ] Pending or threatened litigation
- [ ] IP infringement claims or risk
- [ ] Data privacy compliance (GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA)
- [ ] Employment law compliance (contractor misclassification)
- [ ] Environmental liabilities
- [ ] Tax compliance and audit history
- [ ] Change-of-control clauses in key contracts
- [ ] Non-compete/non-solicit enforceability

**Regulatory Risk Score**
- Industry-specific regulations mapped
- Compliance cost as % of revenue
- Pending regulatory changes that could impact operations

### 4. Operational Excellence (Weight: 15%)

**Operations Scorecard**
| Area | Green | Yellow | Red |
|------|-------|--------|-----|
| Employee turnover | <15% | 15-25% | >25% |
| Key person dependency | Distributed | Some concentration | Single point of failure |
| Process documentation | Comprehensive | Partial | Tribal knowledge |
| Vendor concentration | Diversified | 2-3 critical | Single vendor lock-in |
| Customer support quality | <2hr response, >90% CSAT | 4-8hr, >80% CSAT | >24hr, <70% CSAT |

### 5. Cultural & People (Weight: 10%)

**Integration Risk Assessment**
- Leadership alignment on vision and values
- Compensation structure compatibility
- Remote/hybrid/office culture match
- Decision-making style (flat vs hierarchical)
- Glassdoor/Blind sentiment analysis
- Key employee retention risk (flight risk score)

**Retention Package Benchmarks**
| Role Level | Retention Period | Typical Package |
|------------|-----------------|-----------------|
| C-Suite | 12-24 months | 1-2x base + equity acceleration |
| VP/Director | 12-18 months | 0.5-1x base + equity |
| Key IC | 6-12 months | Spot bonus + equity refresh |

### 6. AI & Automation Readiness (Weight: 10%)

**Agent-Era Value Score**
- Data quality and accessibility (structured, labeled, API-accessible?)
- Process automation potential (which workflows can agents run?)
- AI talent on team (ML engineers, data scientists, prompt engineers)
- Existing AI/ML models or IP
- Competitive moat from proprietary data or models

**Post-Acquisition AI Uplift Estimate**
| Department | Automation Potential | Annual Savings |
|------------|---------------------|----------------|
| Customer Support | 40-60% ticket deflection | $120K-$400K |
| Sales Operations | 30-50% pipeline automation | $80K-$200K |
| Finance/Accounting | 50-70% reconciliation | $60K-$150K |
| HR/Recruiting | 40-60% screening | $50K-$120K |
| Legal/Compliance | 30-40% contract review | $40K-$100K |

## Scoring & Output

### Overall Deal Score (0-100)
- 80-100: Strong buy — proceed to LOI/definitive agreement
- 60-79: Conditional — address specific risks before proceeding
- 40-59: Caution — significant risk areas need resolution
- 0-39: Walk away — deal-breakers present

### Deal-Breaker Triggers (auto-fail regardless of score)
- Undisclosed material litigation
- Revenue fraud or restatement risk
- Key customer representing >40% revenue with no contract
- Unresolvable IP ownership dispute
- Regulatory action that could shut down operations
- Key founder/employee departure with no retention agreement

### Output Template

```
# M&A Due Diligence Report: [Target Company]
Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Prepared for: [Acquirer]

## Executive Summary
- Overall Score: [X/100]
- Recommendation: [BUY / CONDITIONAL / WALK]
- Key Strengths: [3 bullets]
- Critical Risks: [3 bullets]
- Estimated Integration Cost: $[X]
- Post-Acquisition AI Uplift: $[X]/year

## Detailed Scores
| Dimension | Score | Weight | Weighted |
|-----------|-------|--------|----------|
| Financial Health | /100 | 30% | |
| Technology & Product | /100 | 20% | |
| Legal & Compliance | /100 | 15% | |
| Operational Excellence | /100 | 15% | |
| Cultural & People | /100 | 10% | |
| AI & Automation Readiness | /100 | 10% | |
| **Overall** | | | **/100** |

## Red Flags
[Numbered list with severity and mitigation]

## Integration Roadmap
- Day 1-30: [Quick wins]
- Day 31-90: [System integration]
- Day 91-180: [Full operational merge]
- Day 181-365: [Optimization and AI deployment]

## Recommended Next Steps
[3-5 specific actions]
```

## 2026 Benchmarks

**M&A Market Context**
- Average SaaS acquisition multiple: 6-10x ARR (down from 15-20x in 2021)
- Due diligence period: 60-90 days (accelerating with AI tools)
- Integration failure rate: 70-90% of M&As fail to deliver expected value
- #1 reason for failure: Cultural mismatch and poor integration planning
- AI-ready targets command 15-25% premium over comparable non-AI companies

**What's Changed in 2026**
- AI/agent readiness is now a core valuation driver
- Data assets valued separately (proprietary training data = moat)
- Per-seat SaaS revenue declining — usage-based models preferred
- Remote-first companies easier to integrate (no office consolidation)
- Regulatory complexity increasing (EU AI Act, state privacy laws)

---

## Get the Full Industry Pack

This skill gives you the framework. For deep industry-specific due diligence benchmarks, financial models, and competitive intelligence templates:

🖤💛 **AfrexAI Context Packs** — $47 each, 10 industries covered
→ [Browse all packs](https://afrexai-cto.github.io/context-packs/)

📊 **Free AI Revenue Calculator** — find what you're leaving on the table
→ [Try it now](https://afrexai-cto.github.io/ai-revenue-calculator/)

🤖 **Agent Setup Wizard** — deploy your first AI agent in 15 minutes
→ [Start here](https://afrexai-cto.github.io/agent-setup/)

💰 **Bundle deals**: Pick 3 for $97 | All 10 for $197 | Everything for $247

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.