Skip to content
Back to skills

Public Technology Review

ASecurity

Build a vendor-neutral, source-linked public-technology procurement evidence and risk review without autonomous scoring or award recommendations.

  • 211 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 21, 2026
ai-agentsgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 21, 2026

npx -y skills add jmagly/ai-writing-guide --skill public-technology-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Public Technology Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Public Technology Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jmagly-public-technology-review-aiwg/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jmagly-public-technology-review-aiwg)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
namespace: aiwg
platforms: [all]
name: public-technology-review
description: Build a vendor-neutral, source-linked public-technology procurement evidence and risk review without autonomous scoring or award recommendations.
triggers:
  - review a public technology procurement
  - compare civic technology contract evidence
  - assess public sector vendor lock in and lifecycle risk
---

# Public Technology Review

## Process

1. Select and cite the governing procurement profile; FAR/NIST are reference
   models unless adopted by that jurisdiction.
2. Inventory need, planning, market research, solicitation, selection, award,
   administration, oversight, and public-release records.
3. Separate protected proposals/source-selection material from public releases.
4. Record claims and evidence without sentiment scores. Risk ratings require a
   human-defined scale, rationale, uncertainty, owner, and verification method.
5. Do not infer corruption, rank vendors, or recommend an award autonomously.
6. Record explicit handoff states for missing records, meeting/vote analysis,
   and any publication packet; protected material never enters a public handoff.

## Output

A schema-valid evidence/risk review and human decision questions.

## References

- `schemas/public-technology-review.schema.json`
- `templates/public-technology-review.md`
- `docs/research/civic-workflow-standards.md`
- `docs/research/control-source-matrix.md`

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.