Skip to content
Back to skills

Claims Validator

ASecurity

Validate documentation for unsupported claims, made-up metrics, and unverifiable statements.

  • 211 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 7 views
  • Added December 21, 2025
testinggotestingperformancedocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add jmagly/ai-writing-guide --skill claims-validator --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Claims Validator?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Claims Validator
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jmagly-claims-validator/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jmagly-claims-validator)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
# claims-validator

Validate documentation for unsupported claims, made-up metrics, and unverifiable statements.

## Triggers

- "check for unsupported claims"
- "validate claims"
- "review for BS"
- "check metrics"
- "verify claims in this document"
- "find made-up stats"

## Purpose

This skill identifies statements that make claims without evidence, including:
- Performance metrics without benchmarks or data
- Time/cost estimates without basis
- Percentage claims without citation
- Comparative statements without baselines
- Features described as implemented that don't exist
- Marketing superlatives presented as facts

## Behavior

When triggered, this skill:

1. **Scans for metric claims**:
   - Percentage improvements ("40% faster", "reduces by 60%")
   - Time estimates ("saves 2-3 hours", "in minutes not hours")
   - Cost projections ("$50-150/month", "ROI of 3x")
   - Performance numbers ("99x faster", "sub-millisecond")

2. **Identifies unsupported comparatives**:
   - "faster than", "better than", "more efficient"
   - "best", "leading", "revolutionary", "game-changing"
   - "comprehensive", "complete", "full-featured"

3. **Checks for feature claims**:
   - Commands or flags mentioned that don't exist in codebase
   - Features described in present tense that aren't implemented
   - Integration claims without actual integration code

4. **Validates citations**:
   - Claims that reference data should have sources
   - Benchmarks should link to methodology
   - Statistics should be reproducible

5. **Generates report**:
   - List each claim found
   - Classification (metric, comparative, feature, cost)
   - Recommendation (remove, add citation, verify, rephrase)

## Claim Categories

### Metrics Without Data

```markdown
# Flagged
"Time Saved: 92-96% (9-15 hours → 45-60 minutes)"
"99x faster routing"
"45x cache speedup"

# Problem
No benchmark data, methodology, or reproducible test

# Fix
Remove claim, or add: "Based on [benchmark/test], measured [how]"
```

### Cost Estimates Without Basis

```markdown
# Flagged
"Budget $20-50/month for moderate use"
"Light usage: ~$10-20/month"
"Enterprise teams may see $100-500+/month"

# Problem
No actual usage data, varies wildly by use case

# Fix
Remove specific numbers, or link to pricing calculator/methodology
```

### Time Estimates Without Data

```markdown
# Flagged
"Deploy Full SDLC Framework (2 Minutes)"
"5 minutes, replaces 2-4 hours manual work"
"campaign setup from 2-3 weeks → 1 week"

# Problem
No measurement, varies by project complexity

# Fix
Remove time claims, describe what it does instead
```

### Comparative Claims Without Baseline

```markdown
# Flagged
"faster than manual processes"
"more efficient than traditional approaches"
"better than existing solutions"

# Problem
No specific comparison, no baseline defined

# Fix
Remove comparison, or specify exactly what's being compared
```

### Feature Claims for Unimplemented Features

```markdown
# Flagged
"aiwg -migrate-workspace  # Optional migration tool"
"Run 'config-validator --fix' to apply automated fixes"

# Problem
Command doesn't exist in codebase

# Fix
Remove until implemented, or mark as "Planned:"
```

### Marketing Superlatives

```markdown
# Flagged
"comprehensive", "revolutionary", "game-changing"
"best-in-class", "industry-leading", "cutting-edge"
"seamless", "effortless", "zero-friction"

# Problem
Subjective claims that can't be verified

# Fix
Replace with specific, factual descriptions
```

## Validation Report Format

```markdown
# Claims Validation Report

**Document**: README.md
**Date**: 2025-12-09
**Claims Found**: 12
**Issues**: 8

## Summary

| Category | Found | Unsupported | Action Needed |
|----------|-------|-------------|---------------|
| Metrics | 5 | 4 | Remove or cite |
| Time estimates | 3 | 3 | Remove |
| Cost estimates | 2 | 2 | Remove |
| Comparatives | 1 | 1 | Rephrase |
| Features | 1 | 1 | Remove (not implemented) |

## Issues

### 1. Unsupported Metric
**Line 204**: "Time Savings: 20-98% reduction across 5 core use cases"
**Problem**: No benchmark data or methodology
**Action**: Remove claim

### 2. Cost Estimate Without Data
**Line 1180**: "Light usage: ~$10-20/month"
**Problem**: No actual usage data to support estimate
**Action**: Remove specific numbers

### 3. Non-existent Feature
**Line 583**: "aiwg -migrate-workspace"
**Problem**: Command not implemented
**Action**: Remove until implemented

## Recommendations

1. **Remove all percentage-based time savings claims**
2. **Remove cost estimates** - direct users to measure their own usage
3. **Remove non-existent commands** - only document what exists
4. **Replace superlatives with specifics** - say what it does, not how good it is
```

## Usage Examples

### Validate a Document

```
User: "Check README.md for unsupported claims"

Output:
"Claims Validation: README.md

Found 8 unsupported claims:

Metrics (4):
- Line 204: '20-98% reduction' - no data
- Line 362: '56-63% time saved' - no data
- Line 588: '99x faster routing' - no benchmark
- Line 589: '45x cache speedup' - no benchmark

Time Estimates (2):
- Line 187: '5 minutes, replaces 2-4 hours' - unmeasured
- Line 366: '2 Minutes' in heading - varies by project

Non-existent Features (2):
- Line 583: 'aiwg -migrate-workspace' - not implemented
- Line 651: 'aiwg -rollback-workspace' - not implemented

Recommendation: Remove these claims. Describe what features
do, not how much time/money they save."
```

### Quick Check

```
User: "Any BS in this section?"

Output:
"Found 2 issues:

1. 'Revolutionary approach' - marketing speak, be specific
2. '10x productivity gain' - no measurement

Suggest: Replace with factual descriptions of functionality."
```

## Integration

This skill complements:
- **Voice Framework**: Voice defines *how* to write, claims-validator checks *what* you claim
- **config-validator**: Validates config files, claims-validator validates prose claims

## What This Skill Does NOT Flag

- Factual descriptions of features that exist
- Documented benchmarks with methodology
- Qualified statements ("may vary", "depending on", "in our testing")
- User testimonials clearly attributed
- Comparative claims with specific baselines cited

## Output Location

- Validation reports: `.aiwg/reports/claims-validation.md`

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.