Skip to content
Back to skills

Requirements

ASecurity

Requirements doc structure (problem, goals, non-goals, constraints, open questions, success criteria). Loaded by scribe.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added October 11, 2026
ai-agentsgo

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 11, 2026

npx -y skills add jisundr/cairn-2.0 --skill requirements --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Requirements?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Requirements
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jisundr-requirements/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jisundr-requirements)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: requirements
description: Requirements doc structure (problem, goals, non-goals, constraints, open questions, success criteria). Loaded by scribe.
---

# cairn:requirements

Write under `docs/`, at a path matching what was asked. When the source material names a file, function, or behavior, check it against the codebase before writing Problem and Goals — a claim that doesn't hold goes under Constraints & assumptions as an open discrepancy, not into Problem as settled fact. Sections:

## Problem

What's wrong or missing today, for whom.

## Goals

What this must do, as checkable statements.

## Non-goals

What's explicitly out of scope, so scope doesn't drift mid-build.

## Stakeholders

Who's affected or has a say, beyond the requester. Omit when there's only one party.

## Constraints & assumptions

What bounds the solution — technical, timeline, dependency — and what's being assumed true without verification.

## Open questions

What's still unresolved and needs a decision before or during the build.

## Success criteria

How anyone can tell the requirement is met, without asking the author.

Keep each section to what the request actually supplies — an empty Non-goals section is fine; a placeholder isn't.

Hand the written path back with one line offering to continue into planning against it — a suggestion, not a trigger. The user may decline and stop here; nothing resolves scope until they ask.

Also loaded by `cairn:scope` for a task folder's `REQUIREMENTS.md`, for this section shape only — there, `reference/requirements-approval.md` governs approval, not the closing line above.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.