Use for a final language pass on a paper section, or when translating a Chinese draft into English academic prose. Removes AI-sounding phrasing, tightens sentences, enforces consistent notation and terminology, and never changes numbers, claims or LaTeX semantics.
Pro scans all 4 files and shows the line behind each finding
Scanned 9/26/2026
npx -y skills add jiayaoqijia/cryptoskill --skill acprk-polish-writing --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Acprk Polish Writing?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jiayaoqijia-acprk-polish-writing)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: polish-writing
description: Use for a final language pass on a paper section, or when translating a Chinese draft into English academic prose. Removes AI-sounding phrasing, tightens sentences, enforces consistent notation and terminology, and never changes numbers, claims or LaTeX semantics.
---
# Polish writing
## Invariants (never violate)
- Do not change numbers, theorem statements, hypotheses, citations, labels or math.
- Do not strengthen claims ("shows" → "proves", "up to" → "always").
- Keep LaTeX commands intact; do not introduce packages.
- In the last 24 hours before a deadline: no style passes at all, only error fixes.
- Output: revised text + a short modification log (what and why) so the author can
accept/reject each change.
## Pass 1 — de-AI
Replace or delete:
| avoid | prefer |
|---|---|
| leverage, utilize | use |
| delve into, explore (as a result) | examine, study (or state the result) |
| pivotal, crucial, paramount | important, key (or delete) |
| underscore, highlight (as filler) | show |
| tapestry, landscape, realm | (delete; name the area) |
| seamless(ly), robust (without a metric) | (delete or quantify) |
| "It is worth noting that", "Notably," | (delete; state the fact) |
| "In this paper, we aim to" | "We ..." |
| "First and foremost", "Last but not least" | (delete) |
| "plays a crucial role in" | "determines", "dominates" (be specific) |
| "novel" about own work | (delete; let the reader judge) |
| "significantly" without numbers | the number |
| "obviously", "it is easy to see" | give the one-line reason, or delete |
Also: convert `itemize` inside running text into connected prose when the items are
reasoning steps (keep lists for contributions/parameters); avoid three connectives
in a row; vary sentence openings; no rhetorical questions in the body.
## Pass 2 — concision
- One idea per sentence; aim for ≤ 30 words.
- Remove throat-clearing openers and doubled phrases ("in order to" → "to",
"the fact that" → "that", "a number of" → "several"/the number).
- Prefer verbs over nominalisations ("perform an evaluation of" → "evaluate").
- Active voice for what *we* did; passive is fine for standard facts.
- Avoid dashes as sentence punctuation (use commas, colons, or split sentences).
## Pass 3 — consistency
- Terminology: one name per concept (framework name, stage names, baseline names).
Build a term list from the notation table and `grep` for variants
(e.g. "bootstrap"/"bootstrapping", "look-up table"/"lookup table", "LUT").
- Notation: symbols match the notation table; no symbol reused with two meanings;
vectors/matrices consistently bold or not.
- Spelling variety: pick US or UK and stay with it.
- Capitalisation of references: `Section~\ref`, `Table~\ref`, or `\Cref` consistently;
non-breaking spaces before `\cite` and `\ref`.
- Numbers: consistent units and precision (e.g. 2 significant digits for ratios);
`\times` spacing consistent; thin space before units.
## Pass 4 — Chinese → English (for drafts written in Chinese)
1. Translate meaning, not word order: Chinese topic-comment sentences often become
English subject-verb sentences with the conclusion first.
2. Split long Chinese sentences joined by commas (一逗到底) into several English
sentences.
3. Watch for common calques: "has important significance" → "matters because ...";
"realize/achieve an algorithm" → "implement"; "the proposed scheme" repeated →
name it once, then "our scheme"/its name; "in recent years" as an opener → delete or
give the year range; "greatly improve" → the number.
4. Articles: every singular countable noun needs a/the; "the" for things already
introduced or unique ("the bootstrapping procedure of [X]").
5. Tense: present for facts and what the paper does; past for what prior work did
or for experiments that were run.
6. Produce three parts: `[LaTeX]` English text, `[Back-translation]` literal Chinese
of the English (so the author can check meaning), `[Log]` list of changes.
## Pass 5 — read-aloud check
Read the abstract and the first page aloud (or via TTS). Any sentence that needs a
second breath gets split.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!