Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Acprk Polish Writing

ASecurity

Use for a final language pass on a paper section, or when translating a Chinese draft into English academic prose. Removes AI-sounding phrasing, tightens sentences, enforces consistent notation and terminology, and never changes numbers, claims or LaTeX semantics.

78 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/26/2026
researchgogitapi

Works with

api

Security Analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 4 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned 9/26/2026

$npx -y skills add jiayaoqijia/cryptoskill --skill acprk-polish-writing --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Acprk Polish Writing?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Acprk Polish Writing
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jiayaoqijia-acprk-polish-writing/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jiayaoqijia-acprk-polish-writing)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: polish-writing
description: Use for a final language pass on a paper section, or when translating a Chinese draft into English academic prose. Removes AI-sounding phrasing, tightens sentences, enforces consistent notation and terminology, and never changes numbers, claims or LaTeX semantics.
---

# Polish writing

## Invariants (never violate)

- Do not change numbers, theorem statements, hypotheses, citations, labels or math.
- Do not strengthen claims ("shows" → "proves", "up to" → "always").
- Keep LaTeX commands intact; do not introduce packages.
- In the last 24 hours before a deadline: no style passes at all, only error fixes.
- Output: revised text + a short modification log (what and why) so the author can
  accept/reject each change.

## Pass 1 — de-AI

Replace or delete:

| avoid | prefer |
|---|---|
| leverage, utilize | use |
| delve into, explore (as a result) | examine, study (or state the result) |
| pivotal, crucial, paramount | important, key (or delete) |
| underscore, highlight (as filler) | show |
| tapestry, landscape, realm | (delete; name the area) |
| seamless(ly), robust (without a metric) | (delete or quantify) |
| "It is worth noting that", "Notably," | (delete; state the fact) |
| "In this paper, we aim to" | "We ..." |
| "First and foremost", "Last but not least" | (delete) |
| "plays a crucial role in" | "determines", "dominates" (be specific) |
| "novel" about own work | (delete; let the reader judge) |
| "significantly" without numbers | the number |
| "obviously", "it is easy to see" | give the one-line reason, or delete |

Also: convert `itemize` inside running text into connected prose when the items are
reasoning steps (keep lists for contributions/parameters); avoid three connectives
in a row; vary sentence openings; no rhetorical questions in the body.

## Pass 2 — concision

- One idea per sentence; aim for ≤ 30 words.
- Remove throat-clearing openers and doubled phrases ("in order to" → "to",
  "the fact that" → "that", "a number of" → "several"/the number).
- Prefer verbs over nominalisations ("perform an evaluation of" → "evaluate").
- Active voice for what *we* did; passive is fine for standard facts.
- Avoid dashes as sentence punctuation (use commas, colons, or split sentences).

## Pass 3 — consistency

- Terminology: one name per concept (framework name, stage names, baseline names).
  Build a term list from the notation table and `grep` for variants
  (e.g. "bootstrap"/"bootstrapping", "look-up table"/"lookup table", "LUT").
- Notation: symbols match the notation table; no symbol reused with two meanings;
  vectors/matrices consistently bold or not.
- Spelling variety: pick US or UK and stay with it.
- Capitalisation of references: `Section~\ref`, `Table~\ref`, or `\Cref` consistently;
  non-breaking spaces before `\cite` and `\ref`.
- Numbers: consistent units and precision (e.g. 2 significant digits for ratios);
  `\times` spacing consistent; thin space before units.

## Pass 4 — Chinese → English (for drafts written in Chinese)

1. Translate meaning, not word order: Chinese topic-comment sentences often become
   English subject-verb sentences with the conclusion first.
2. Split long Chinese sentences joined by commas (一逗到底) into several English
   sentences.
3. Watch for common calques: "has important significance" → "matters because ...";
   "realize/achieve an algorithm" → "implement"; "the proposed scheme" repeated →
   name it once, then "our scheme"/its name; "in recent years" as an opener → delete or
   give the year range; "greatly improve" → the number.
4. Articles: every singular countable noun needs a/the; "the" for things already
   introduced or unique ("the bootstrapping procedure of [X]").
5. Tense: present for facts and what the paper does; past for what prior work did
   or for experiments that were run.
6. Produce three parts: `[LaTeX]` English text, `[Back-translation]` literal Chinese
   of the English (so the author can check meaning), `[Log]` list of changes.

## Pass 5 — read-aloud check

Read the abstract and the first page aloud (or via TTS). Any sentence that needs a
second breath gets split.

Attribution

jiayaoqijiajiayaoqijia
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from jiayaoqijia →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report co...

502942 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

953191 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end p...

502941 votes

Literature Review

Assistance with writing literature reviews by searching for academic sources via Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref and PubMed APIs. Use when the user needs to find papers on a topic, get details for specific DOIs, or draft sections of a literature review with proper citations.

6511 votes
View all in research →