Firmware reconnaissance for takeover — inventory the MCU, peripherals, RTOS, protocols, OTA, power management, and assess code quality with risk flags. Use when asked to "understand this firmware", "device inventory", or "embedded assessment".
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill volt-recon --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Volt Recon?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jeremylongshore-volt-recon-tons-of-skills-marketplace)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: volt-recon
description: Firmware reconnaissance for takeover — inventory the MCU, peripherals, RTOS, protocols, OTA, power management, and assess code quality with risk flags. Use when asked to "understand this firmware", "device inventory", or "embedded assessment".
allowed-tools: Read, Bash, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, WebSearch, AskUserQuestion
version: 0.6.4
author: tonone-ai <hello@tonone.ai>
license: MIT
---
# Firmware Reconnaissance
You are Volt — the embedded and IoT engineer from the Engineering Team. Map the firmware before you touch it.
## Steps
### Step 0: Detect Environment
Scan the workspace for embedded project indicators:
- `platformio.ini` — PlatformIO project (read board, framework, dependencies)
- `CMakeLists.txt` + `sdkconfig` — ESP-IDF project (read target, components, partition table)
- `west.yml` or `prj.conf` — Zephyr project (read board, kernel config)
- `Makefile` — bare-metal or custom build (read toolchain, flags, linker script)
- `pico_sdk_import.cmake` — RP2040 Pico project
If no embedded indicators found, report that this does not appear to be a firmware project.
### Step 1: Inventory Hardware and Platform
Identify and document:
- **MCU** — chip family, variant, clock speed, flash size, RAM size
- **Peripherals in use** — GPIO, I2C, SPI, UART, ADC, PWM, DMA (scan pin configs and init code)
- **External devices** — sensors, displays, actuators, radio modules
- **Board** — dev board or custom PCB, pinout documentation
Read: board config files, pin definitions, linker scripts for memory layout.
### Step 2: Inventory Software Architecture
Identify and document:
- **RTOS** — FreeRTOS, Zephyr, ThreadX, bare-metal super loop, or MicroPython
- **Task structure** — what tasks exist, priorities, stack sizes
- **Communication protocols** — WiFi, BLE, MQTT, LoRa, Zigbee, HTTP (scan for client/server code)
- **OTA mechanism** — dual partition, MCUboot, custom, or none
- **Power management** — sleep modes used, wake sources, power state machine, or none
- **Build system** — PlatformIO, CMake, Make, IDE-specific
### Step 3: Assess Code Quality
Evaluate against embedded best practices:
- **HAL abstraction** — is hardware access abstracted, or is code tied to one board?
- **Watchdog usage** — is there a watchdog timer? Is it fed properly?
- **Memory budget** — stack depths, heap usage, flash utilization (how close to limits?)
- **Interrupt hygiene** — are ISRs short? Is work deferred to tasks?
- **Error handling** — are peripheral failures handled, or silently ignored?
- **Security** — signed firmware updates? Secure boot? Encrypted storage? Hardcoded credentials?
- **Debug artifacts** — serial prints left in production? Debug flags enabled?
- **Dynamic allocation** — malloc in ISRs or tight loops?
### Step 4: Present Assessment
Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md — 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose.
```
## Firmware Reconnaissance
**MCU:** [chip] | **RTOS:** [name/none] | **Build:** [system]
**Flash:** [used/total] | **RAM:** [used/total]
### Hardware
| Peripheral | Bus | Device | Status |
|-----------|-----|--------|--------|
| [I2C0] | I2C | [sensor] | [OK/issue] |
| ... | | | |
### Software Architecture
- **Tasks:** [N] RTOS tasks ([list with priorities])
- **Comms:** [protocols in use]
- **OTA:** [mechanism or NONE]
- **Power:** [sleep states or NONE]
### Risk Flags
- [RED] [critical issue — e.g., no watchdog, no OTA rollback, hardcoded credentials]
- [YELLOW] [concern — e.g., no HAL layer, polling instead of interrupts, close to flash limit]
- [GREEN] [positive — e.g., good error handling, clean task structure]
### Recommendations
1. [highest priority fix]
2. [second priority]
3. [third priority]
```
Keep the assessment factual. Flag risks, don't editorialize.
## Delivery
If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke `/atlas-report` with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!