Skip to content
Back to skills

Salesforce Reference Architecture

ASecurity

Design a governed Salesforce integration architecture with explicit authority, identity, API, event, data, evidence, limit, and recovery boundaries. Use when conducting architecture reviews. Trigger with "design Salesforce architecture".

  • 2,719 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 21, 2026
ai-agentsrustgoapidatabasesecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • claude code
  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 21, 2026

npx -y skills add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus --skill salesforce-reference-architecture --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Salesforce Reference Architecture?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Salesforce Reference Architecture
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jeremylongshore-salesforce-reference-architecture-88d263d8/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jeremylongshore-salesforce-reference-architecture-88d263d8)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: salesforce-reference-architecture
description: 'Design a governed Salesforce integration architecture with explicit authority, identity, API, event, data, evidence, limit, and recovery boundaries. Use when conducting architecture reviews. Trigger with "design Salesforce architecture".'
argument-hint: "[system-or-domain] [constraints]"
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, Write, Edit
version: 1.8.0
author: Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
license: MIT
tags: [saas, salesforce, architecture, integration, governance]
model: inherit
effort: high
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code; architecture and production trust-boundary decisions require enterprise, security, data, and Salesforce platform approval
---
# Governed Salesforce Integration Reference Architecture

## Overview

Create an evidence-backed target architecture that names every source of truth, mutation path, principal, data class, failure boundary, and recovery mechanism.

## Prerequisites

- Business capabilities, system context, sources of truth, data owners, consumers, service objectives, and constraints
- Org topology, Salesforce products, External Client Apps or existing Connected Apps, APIs, events, limits, and entitlements
- Security, privacy, residency, retention, reconciliation, disaster recovery, support, and change-control requirements

## Tool Discipline

Use `Read`, `Glob`, and `Grep` to inspect approved repository and evidence files, `WebFetch` to re-check current first-party Salesforce documentation, and `Write` or `Edit` only for secretless plans, fixtures, configuration, and redacted receipts.

## Current Contract

Salesforce provides multiple synchronous, asynchronous, bulk, composite, and event integration surfaces with org-specific availability and limits. No single direct API, middleware, replicated database, or event pattern is correct for every domain.

## Authentication

Model human, integration, deployment, diagnostic, and break-glass principals separately. Bind each to an approved app, OAuth flow, minimum permissions, secret custody, rotation, revocation, and audit path.

## Instructions

1. Map systems, trust zones, sources of truth, record and event ownership, consumers, data classes, and business invariants.
2. Inventory orgs, products, editions, packages, schemas, API versions, events, limits, identities, and operational dependencies.
3. Select interaction patterns per use case: synchronous request, asynchronous bulk, composite, event, scheduled reconciliation, or replicated read model.
4. Define contracts for schema, versioning, idempotency, ordering, pagination, checkpoints, retries, dead letters, and backfills.
5. Design CRUD and field access, sharing, encryption, retention, audit, residency, redaction, support, and separation of duties.
6. Model outages, limit exhaustion, partial writes, event gaps, schema drift, wrong-org access, and disaster recovery.
7. Validate with threat, failure, capacity, cost, operability, migration, and rollback reviews and record rejected alternatives.

## Approval Boundaries

Do not establish new trust, data movement, system authority, production mutation, or vendor dependency without architecture, security, data, and business approval.

## Output

Return context and container views, authority matrix, trust and data-flow boundaries, contracts, failure scenarios, capacity and cost assumptions, decisions, risks, and migration plan.

## Error Handling

| Condition | Response |
|---|---|
| Two systems claim authority for the same field | Resolve ownership and conflict policy before implementation. |
| Recovery depends only on replay availability | Add durable reconciliation and backfill from the source of truth. |
| Entitlement or limit assumption is unverified | Mark the design provisional and obtain current org evidence. |

## Example

A redacted completion receipt might look like this:

```text
domain=orders; authority=erp; salesforce=crm-projection; writes=governed; events=cdc; reconcile=daily; recovery=tested
```

## Resources

- [Salesforce integration patterns](https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.integration_patterns_and_practices.meta/integration_patterns_and_practices/)
- [Salesforce Pub/Sub API](https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/platform/pub-sub-api/overview)

## Next Steps

Run the workflow first in the lowest-risk authorized org and preserve its redacted receipt. Schedule a review against the next Salesforce seasonal release and the customer change calendar.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.