Skip to content
Back to skills

Miro Reference Architecture

ASecurity

Analyze requirements and design tenant-safe Miro boundaries across Web SDK, backend OAuth, REST adapters, queues, reconciliation, and approval-gated live operations. Use when planning a Miro integration. Trigger with \"miro integration reference architecture\".

  • 2,781 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 22, 2026
ai-agentsapibackendsecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • claude code
  • cursor
  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 22, 2026

npx -y skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill miro-reference-architecture --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Miro Reference Architecture?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Miro Reference Architecture
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jeremylongshore-miro-reference-architecture-1b116f38/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jeremylongshore-miro-reference-architecture-1b116f38)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: miro-reference-architecture
description: "Analyze requirements and design tenant-safe Miro boundaries across Web SDK, backend OAuth, REST adapters, queues, reconciliation, and approval-gated live operations. Use when planning a Miro integration. Trigger with \"miro integration reference architecture\"."
argument-hint: "[use-case] [deployment-model]"
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, Write, Edit
version: 1.9.0
author: Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
license: MIT
tags:
- saas
- miro
- architecture
- design
model: inherit
effort: high
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code; live work requires an authorized Miro app and redacted evidence
---
# Miro Integration Reference Architecture

## Overview

Put each capability at the correct browser, backend, tenant, and persistence boundary; use the evidence produced here to make the next decision explicit and reviewable.

## Prerequisites

- Approved Miro application, tenant, and board scope
- Current repository and deployment evidence
- Named owner, success criteria, and rollback or recovery boundary

## Tool Discipline

Use `Read`, `Glob`, and `Grep` to inspect the repository, configuration names, adapters, tests, and evidence. Use `WebFetch` only for current official Miro documentation. Use `Write` or `Edit` after confirming the requested mode, target environment, tenant, board, and approval boundary. These declared tools do not call authenticated Miro APIs or deployment CLIs; implement client, configuration, and test changes, then return exact operator commands or an approval-gated handoff for live execution.

## Current Contract

- Web SDK operates in loaded board contexts; REST requires OAuth Authorization Code.
- Hybrid apps configure SDK authorization for backend REST authentication.
- Tokens must bind to app, user, team, and scopes.
- Durable change capture requires reconciliation because REST webhooks were retired.

## Authentication

For REST work, use OAuth 2.0 Authorization Code with the narrowest Miro scopes. Bind each encrypted token record to its user, application, authorized team, and granted scopes. Never print access tokens, refresh tokens, client secrets, authorization codes, or board content.

## Instructions

1. Map actors, tenants, boards, data classes, journeys, and destructive operations.
2. Assign in-board interaction to Web SDK and durable orchestration to backend REST.
3. Define OAuth callback, rotating encrypted token storage, tenant authorization, and revocation.
4. Add weighted queues, cursor checkpoints, operation records, reconciliation, and safe telemetry.
5. Design failures for auth loss, tenant mismatch, 429, ambiguous writes, drift, and outage.
6. Review scopes, retention, capacity, recovery, and experimental use with owners.

## Approval Boundaries

Shared tokens, browser-held client secrets, unbounded polling, and experimental dependencies require architecture/security approval and should normally be rejected. Pause when the responsible owner or exact target is uncertain.

## Output

Return scope, observed contract, proposed or completed actions, verification evidence, approvals, residual risks, and next owner. State what was not inspected or changed so the receipt cannot overclaim coverage.

## Error Handling

| Condition | Response |
|---|---|
| Tenant or board context mismatches | Stop before mutation and quarantine the credential mapping. |
| Current docs contradict the implementation | Treat the official current contract as a blocker and design an explicit migration. |
| A mutation result is ambiguous | Reconcile state before retrying. |
| Required evidence is unavailable | Return a blocked decision with the smallest safe next probe. |

## Examples

The example is a redacted operator receipt; identifiers are hashes or bounded labels, not board content or credentials.

```text
ui=web-sdk; auth=backend-oauth; rest=v2; tokens=tenant-bound; events=5m-reconcile
```

## Resources

- [Skill-specific official documentation](references/official-docs.md)
- [REST auth from Web SDK](https://developers.miro.com/docs/enable-api-authentication-from-sdk-authorization)
- [REST introduction](https://developers.miro.com/reference/overview)

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.2 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.