Skip to content
Back to skills

Miro Ci Integration

ASecurity

Design and implement repository-side Miro CI gates with schema-faithful fixtures, protected live-test handoffs, test-board isolation, and cleanup proof. Use when adding Miro checks to CI. Trigger with \"test Miro in CI\".

  • 2,781 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 22, 2026
ai-agentsrusttestingapisecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • claude code
  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 22, 2026

npx -y skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill miro-ci-integration --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Miro Ci Integration?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Miro Ci Integration
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jeremylongshore-miro-ci-integration-49588a72/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jeremylongshore-miro-ci-integration-49588a72)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: miro-ci-integration
description: "Design and implement repository-side Miro CI gates with schema-faithful fixtures, protected live-test handoffs, test-board isolation, and cleanup proof. Use when adding Miro checks to CI. Trigger with \"test Miro in CI\"."
argument-hint: "[pipeline] [test-scope]"
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, Write, Edit
version: 1.9.0
author: Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
license: MIT
tags:
- saas
- miro
- ci
- testing
model: inherit
effort: high
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code; live work requires an authorized Miro app and redacted evidence
---
# Miro CI Contract Tests

## Overview

Keep pull-request checks credential-free and reserve live Miro calls for protected, explicitly scoped lanes. A test must never mutate a collaboration board by accident; use the evidence produced here to make the next decision explicit and reviewable.

## Prerequisites

- CI trust-boundary and fork policy
- Pinned schemas/fixtures and test command
- Dedicated app, team, board, identity, and cleanup owner for live tests

## Tool Discipline

Use `Read`, `Glob`, and `Grep` to inspect the repository, configuration names, adapters, tests, and evidence. Use `WebFetch` only for current official Miro documentation. Use `Write` or `Edit` after confirming the requested mode, target environment, tenant, board, and approval boundary. These declared tools do not call authenticated Miro APIs or deployment CLIs; implement client, configuration, and test changes, then return exact operator commands or an approval-gated handoff for live execution.

## Current Contract

- Untrusted fork workflows must not receive Miro credentials.
- Live traffic consumes production-like per-user/application credits even on test resources.
- Bulk create is transactional but cleanup still needs an explicit inventory and board guard.
- OAuth refresh rotation can invalidate concurrent jobs sharing one installation.

## Authentication

For REST work, use OAuth 2.0 Authorization Code with the narrowest Miro scopes. Bind each encrypted token record to its user, application, authorized team, and granted scopes. Never print access tokens, refresh tokens, client secrets, authorization codes, or board content.

## Instructions

1. Split formatting, unit, schema, security, and fixture tests from the protected live lane.
2. Assert that PR/fork lanes have no credential context and cannot invoke live helpers.
3. Pin dependencies and validate captured fixtures against current official response contracts.
4. Serialize protected live jobs per installation, assert app/team/board guards, and use bounded read-first tests.
5. Mark any created item with the run identity, reconcile it, then clean only confirmed run-owned IDs.
6. Fail the gate on leaked data, ambiguous writes, cleanup residue, unexpected schema, or quota-policy breach.

## Approval Boundaries

Do not expose credentials to forks, share one rotating token across parallel jobs, or enable destructive live tests without repository and board-owner approval. Pause when the responsible owner or exact target is uncertain.

## Output

Return lane/trust map, fixture provenance, protected-resource guards, test results, credits used, cleanup receipt, and gate conclusion. State what was not inspected or changed so the receipt cannot overclaim coverage.

## Error Handling

| Condition | Response |
|---|---|
| Fork lane can read secrets | Disable the live path and repair workflow permissions before merging. |
| Refresh collision occurs | Serialize jobs or isolate installations. |
| Cleanup cannot prove ownership | Leave content intact and fail the lane. |
| Rate headroom is low | Skip live mutations and report capacity pressure. |

## Examples

The example is a redacted operator receipt; identifiers are hashes or bounded labels, not board content or credentials.

```text
unit=46/46; schemas=12/12; fork-secrets=0; live-read=passed; live-writes=0; cleanup-residue=0
```

## Resources

- [Skill-specific official documentation](references/official-docs.md)
- [OAuth guide](https://developers.miro.com/docs/getting-started-with-oauth)
- [Rate limits](https://developers.miro.com/reference/rate-limiting)

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.1 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.