Skip to content
Back to skills

Grammarly Ci Integration

ASecurity

'Configure Grammarly CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions and testing.

  • 2,691 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 2, 2026
ai-agentstypescriptgobashnodetestinggitapici/cdsecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • claude code
  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 2, 2026

npx -y skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill grammarly-ci-integration --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Grammarly Ci Integration?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Grammarly Ci Integration
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jeremylongshore-grammarly-ci-integration-tons-of-skills-marketplace/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jeremylongshore-grammarly-ci-integration-tons-of-skills-marketplace)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: grammarly-ci-integration
description: 'Configure Grammarly CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions and testing.

  Use when setting up automated testing, configuring CI pipelines,

  or integrating Grammarly tests into your build process.

  Trigger with phrases like "grammarly CI", "grammarly GitHub Actions",

  "grammarly automated tests", "CI grammarly".

  '
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash(gh:*)
version: 1.8.0
license: MIT
author: Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
tags:
- saas
- grammarly
- writing
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code
---
# Grammarly CI Integration

## Overview

Set up CI/CD for Grammarly text analysis integrations: run unit tests with mocked grammar check and suggestion responses on every PR, validate live API connectivity for text scoring on merge to main. Grammarly's Text API provides writing quality scores, grammar corrections, and tone detection, so CI pipelines verify content quality gates, documentation linting, and automated writing feedback workflows.

## GitHub Actions Workflow

```yaml
# .github/workflows/grammarly-ci.yml
name: Grammarly CI
on:
  pull_request:
    paths: ['src/**', 'docs/**', 'tests/**']
  push:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  unit-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with: { node-version: '20' }
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm test -- --reporter=verbose

  integration-tests:
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
    needs: unit-tests
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with: { node-version: '20' }
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm run test:integration
        env:
          GRAMMARLY_CLIENT_ID: ${{ secrets.GRAMMARLY_CLIENT_ID }}
          GRAMMARLY_CLIENT_SECRET: ${{ secrets.GRAMMARLY_CLIENT_SECRET }}
```

## Mock-Based Unit Tests

```typescript
// tests/grammarly-service.test.ts
import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest';
import { checkDocumentation } from '../src/grammarly-service';

vi.mock('../src/grammarly-client', () => ({
  GrammarlyClient: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({
    checkText: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
      overall_score: 87,
      alerts: [
        { type: 'grammar', message: 'Subject-verb disagreement', offset: 12, length: 5, replacements: ['are'] },
        { type: 'clarity', message: 'Consider simplifying', offset: 45, length: 20, replacements: ['use'] },
      ],
      tone: { formal: 0.8, confident: 0.7 },
    }),
    getSuggestions: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
      suggestions: [{ text: 'Rephrase for clarity', category: 'engagement' }],
    }),
  })),
}));

describe('Grammarly Service', () => {
  it('checks documentation quality and returns score', async () => {
    const result = await checkDocumentation('The data is ready for review.');
    expect(result.overall_score).toBeGreaterThan(80);
    expect(result.alerts).toHaveLength(2);
  });
});
```

## Integration Tests

```typescript
// tests/integration/grammarly.integration.test.ts
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';

const hasCredentials = !!process.env.GRAMMARLY_CLIENT_ID;

describe.skipIf(!hasCredentials)('Grammarly Live API', () => {
  it('analyzes text via Text API', async () => {
    const tokenRes = await fetch('https://api.grammarly.com/v1/oauth/token', {
      method: 'POST',
      headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
      body: JSON.stringify({
        client_id: process.env.GRAMMARLY_CLIENT_ID,
        client_secret: process.env.GRAMMARLY_CLIENT_SECRET,
        grant_type: 'client_credentials',
      }),
    });
    expect(tokenRes.status).toBe(200);
    const { access_token } = await tokenRes.json();
    expect(access_token).toBeDefined();
  });
});
```

## Error Handling

| CI Issue | Cause | Fix |
|----------|-------|-----|
| `401 Unauthorized` | Invalid client credentials | Regenerate at developer.grammarly.com |
| OAuth token expired | Token TTL exceeded | Implement token refresh before each test run |
| Score below threshold | Content quality regression | Set minimum score in CI config (e.g., 75) and fix flagged alerts |
| Rate limit (429) | Too many text check requests | Batch text submissions and add throttling |
| Empty suggestions | Text too short for analysis | Ensure test inputs are at least 50 characters |

## Prerequisites

- CI secret references rather than literal credentials, a sandbox endpoint, and fixtures containing only fictional text.
- Protected branches, retention/redaction assertions, and a rollback mechanism for deployment/configuration the pipeline can influence.

## Instructions

1. Run mocked unit tests first, including malformed response, denied consent, retention, and quota cases.
2. Run a bounded sandbox integration with idempotency and prohibit production destinations in CI configuration.
3. Emit aggregate counts, correlation IDs, and policy revisions only; fail for unknown destination, expanded scope, or unredacted log assertion.
4. Canary after protected review, verify synthetic behavior/retention, and restore the last-known-good revision on failure.

## Output

Publish a CI receipt with commit SHA, fixture revision, sandbox target, test totals, policy checks, canary outcome, and rollback reference. Exclude text, suggestions, and secrets.

## Examples

`sha=abc123; fixtures=v5; sandbox=ci-synthetic; tests=18/18; consent=pass; retention=none; canary=not-promoted` is a valid pre-production receipt.

## Resources

- [Grammarly Developer API](https://developer.grammarly.com/)
- Grammarly Text API Reference
- [GitHub Actions Secrets](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/encrypted-secrets)

## Next Steps

For deployment, see `grammarly-deploy-integration`.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.