Diagnose the most expensive silent failure on a CoreWeave multi-node GPU job: GPUDirect RDMA falling back from InfiniBand to TCP. When NCCL drops from NET/IB to NET/Socket, collectives keep running with NO error but throughput collapses (commonly 5-20x slower) while every GPU still bills at full rate — 5x the GPU bill for the same work, invisibly. Paste an NCCL_DEBUG=INFO log (and/or a pod-spec, ibstat, or all_reduce_perf output) and the bundled deterministic script verdicts whether RDMA is a...
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill coreweave-fabric-diagnostics --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Coreweave Fabric Diagnostics?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jeremylongshore-coreweave-fabric-diagnostics)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: coreweave-fabric-diagnostics
description: |
Diagnose the most expensive silent failure on a CoreWeave multi-node GPU job:
GPUDirect RDMA falling back from InfiniBand to TCP. When NCCL drops from NET/IB to
NET/Socket, collectives keep running with NO error but throughput collapses (commonly
5-20x slower) while every GPU still bills at full rate — 5x the GPU bill for the same
work, invisibly. Paste an NCCL_DEBUG=INFO log (and/or a pod-spec, ibstat, or
all_reduce_perf output) and the bundled deterministic script verdicts whether RDMA is
actually engaged, which of the three required conditions is missing, and the fix.
Use when multi-node training is slow, when checking whether RDMA/InfiniBand is engaged,
or when all-reduce bandwidth looks low. Trigger with "coreweave slow training", "is RDMA
working", "NCCL fell back to TCP", "NET/Socket", "GPUDirect RDMA", "infiniband not
used", "multi-node training slow".
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Bash(kubectl get:*), Bash(python3:*)
version: 1.11.0
author: Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
license: MIT
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code
tags: [saas, coreweave, gpu-cloud, rdma, nccl]
---
# CoreWeave Fabric Diagnostics
> **Community-contributed.** Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by
> CoreWeave, Inc. CoreWeave is a registered trademark of CoreWeave, Inc.
Detects when a CoreWeave multi-node GPU job has silently fallen off the InfiniBand fabric
onto TCP — the failure that makes distributed training run at a fraction of the hardware's
speed while every GPU keeps billing at the full rate — and gives the exact fix.
## Overview
On a CoreWeave multi-node job, NCCL should carry collectives over **InfiniBand with
GPUDirect RDMA** (`NET/IB`). If any one of three conditions is missing, NCCL **silently
falls back to TCP sockets** (`NET/Socket`): the job still runs, still converges, and
raises **no error** — but all-reduce throughput collapses (commonly cited as **5-20x
slower** [[nccl]]) because it now crosses the Ethernet control plane instead of the
400 Gb/s-class fabric. You keep paying full GPU rate for a multi-node run that performs
like a badly-connected one. This is the single highest-dollar invisible failure on the
platform, and nothing in the default output flags it.
The diagnosis is **deterministic**: the bundled `scripts/fabric-check.py` greps the pasted
`NCCL_DEBUG=INFO` log for the decisive `Using network` line (and `NET/IB` vs `NET/Socket`),
parses the pod-spec's `resources` block for the RDMA device request, reads `ibstat` port
state, and echoes any `all_reduce_perf` bus bandwidth — then emits a VERDICT with the
`rdma_engaged`/`transport` call, the missing conditions, and the fix. The LLM never
eyeballs which transport is in use; the script decides. Deep grounding lives in
`references/`, loaded only when a leg of the diagnosis needs it.
## Prerequisites
- **An `NCCL_DEBUG=INFO` log from the actual run** — the primary signal. Re-run the job
(or one rank) with `NCCL_DEBUG=INFO` set and capture stderr. The decisive line is
`Using network IB` (good) vs `Using network Socket` (the fallback). This is the one input
the skill really needs; everything else corroborates.
- **Optional, for a full diagnosis:** the pod/job spec (`kubectl get pod NAME -o yaml`) to
check the RDMA device request; `ibstat` output from the node for port health; and
`all_reduce_perf` results from CoreWeave's [nccl-tests][nt] to measure bus bandwidth.
- **`python3`** to run the deterministic checker (stdlib only).
- **`kubectl` (read-only)** if corroborating the live pod spec / node cordon state.
**Authentication.** Nothing secret is read. If the pod spec is pulled live, `kubectl` uses
the existing `$KUBECONFIG`; the skill only ever runs `kubectl get` (read-only) — it never
cordons, drains, or applies.
## The three required conditions (all must hold, or NCCL falls back)
1. **The RDMA device is requested in BOTH `resources.requests` AND `resources.limits`**
(`rdma/ib: 1`). If it is in only one — or absent — the device plugin does not inject the
IB device into the pod and NCCL never sees a HCA. [unverified — the exact resource key
(e.g. `rdma/ib`) depends on the installed RDMA device-plugin config; confirm with
`kubectl describe node` / `kubectl get node -o yaml`.]
2. **`NCCL_IB_HCA=ibp` and `NCCL_SOCKET_IFNAME=eth0` are set** (CoreWeave's documented
values [[cw]]) — unless you launch via the **MPI Operator**, which manages this network
config for you [[nt]].
3. **`NCCL_DEBUG=INFO` then confirms `NET/IB`** (ideally a `GPU Direct RDMA Enabled` line).
If it shows `NET/Socket` / `Using network Socket`, RDMA is not engaged.
Full checklist with verification commands: [`references/rdma-engagement-checklist.md`](references/rdma-engagement-checklist.md).
## Instructions
The pipeline is **gather → verdict → fix → confirm**. The script does the transport call;
`references/` carry the grounding:
1. Gather the `NCCL_DEBUG=INFO` log (required) plus any pod-spec / ibstat / all_reduce_perf
output you have. Concatenate them into one paste — the checker keys on each signal
independently.
2. Run the deterministic checker to get the VERDICT.
3. If the verdict is **fallback (Socket)**, apply the three-condition fix and re-run.
4. If the verdict is **IB but degraded**, chase the degraded signal (port down / low busbw).
5. On NVSwitch systems with a stuck fabric, use the Fabric Manager reset order.
### Step 1: Gather the evidence
The log is the load-bearing input. If the user has not run with `NCCL_DEBUG=INFO`, tell
them to — without it, transport selection is unknowable. To pull the live pod spec:
```bash
kubectl get pod "$POD" -o yaml > pod.yaml
```
### Step 2: Run the deterministic checker (it makes the call, not the model)
Pipe everything you gathered to `fabric-check.py`. It greps for the decisive `Using
network` line, the `resources` block, `ibstat` state, and any `Avg bus bandwidth`:
```bash
cat nccl-debug.log pod.yaml ibstat.txt allreduce.txt 2>/dev/null | \
python3 scripts/fabric-check.py
```
The verdict names `rdma_engaged` (yes/no/partial/unknown), the `transport` in use, the
missing conditions, and the fix. Use `--json` to capture the structured result for further
processing. Reading the log by eye is what this step exists to prevent — see
[`references/nccl-debug-reading.md`](references/nccl-debug-reading.md) for what each line
means.
Use `Glob` to gather multiple pasted log files when a run spans several ranks, `Write` the
verdict report to the working directory, and `Edit` it to refine the fix as the user
iterates on the manifest.
### Step 3: If the verdict is fallback (NET/Socket) — apply the three-condition fix
This is the money case. Fix in order (the checker prints the same list):
1. Add `rdma/ib: 1` to **both** `resources.requests` and `resources.limits`.
2. Set `NCCL_IB_HCA=ibp` and `NCCL_SOCKET_IFNAME=eth0` (or launch via the MPI Operator).
3. Re-run with `NCCL_DEBUG=INFO` and confirm the log now shows `NET/IB` +
`GPU Direct RDMA Enabled`, not `NET/Socket`.
If the log shows `NCCL_IB_DISABLE=1`, that alone forces sockets — set it to `0` (RoCE and
IB both need the IB verbs transport enabled [[env]]).
### Step 4: If the verdict is IB-but-degraded — chase the degraded signal
RDMA can be engaged yet slow. Two corroborating checks:
- **`ibstat`** — every port must read `State: Active` / `Physical state: LinkUp`. A port
`Down`/`Polling`, or a link that flaps, drags the whole collective; CoreWeave
auto-cordons flapping links, so a shrinking node count mid-run is a fabric symptom.
- **`all_reduce_perf` bus bandwidth** — compare the reported `busbw` against **CoreWeave's
published nccl-tests manifest baseline for your GPU count + NCCL version** [[nt]]. Do
**not** compare against a fixed number: the baseline moves with GPU type, node count, NCCL
version, and SHARP. The checker echoes the observed figure tagged `[unverified vs
baseline]` precisely so nobody reads it as a hard pass/fail.
Details + the busbw-vs-algbw distinction: [`references/allreduce-baseline.md`](references/allreduce-baseline.md).
### Step 5: NVSwitch systems — Fabric Manager reset order
On NVSwitch/NVLink systems, a wedged fabric shows up as NVLink/NVSwitch errors rather than
IB fallback. The safe reset order is **stop Fabric Manager → reset the GPUs → start Fabric
Manager**, never the reverse:
```bash
sudo systemctl stop nvidia-fabricmanager
sudo nvidia-smi -r # GPU reset
sudo systemctl start nvidia-fabricmanager
```
`[unverified — service unit name and reset support vary by image/driver; on managed
CoreWeave nodes prefer opening a support ticket / cordoning over an in-place reset.]`
## Output
- **A VERDICT line** stating whether RDMA is engaged, the transport actually in use, and —
for the fallback case — the plain-language cost framing (running on TCP, paying full GPU
rate for a fraction of the throughput).
- **The missing-conditions list** — which of the three required conditions is absent, each
one sufficient on its own to force the fallback.
- **The ordered fix** — the `rdma/ib`-in-requests-AND-limits change, the env vars, and the
re-verify step.
- **Degraded-fabric signals** when RDMA is engaged but slow — down/flapping IB ports and the
observed `busbw` (tagged `[unverified vs baseline]`).
## Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Solution |
|-------|-------|----------|
| Verdict is `unknown` | No `NET/IB` / `NET/Socket` / `Using network` line in the paste | Re-run the job with `NCCL_DEBUG=INFO` and capture stderr; without it transport is unknowable. |
| Verdict `Socket` but the pod "has RDMA" | `rdma/ib` in `limits` only (or only `requests`) | Add it to BOTH blocks; the device plugin injects the IB device only when the resource is requested. |
| `NET/IB` present yet training still slow | GDR not actually enabled; `nvidia-peermem` unloaded → traffic stages through host memory | Confirm a `GPU Direct RDMA Enabled` line; verify `nvidia-peermem` is loaded on the node [[nccl]]. |
| `busbw` "looks low" | Compared against a wrong/guessed baseline | Compare only against CoreWeave's nccl-tests manifest baseline for your GPU count + NCCL version; the number is workload/version-dependent. |
| Nodes drop out mid-run | Flapping IB link → CoreWeave auto-cordon | Check `ibstat` for `Physical state` != `LinkUp`; the cordoned node's link is the cause, not your job. |
| `rdma/ib` resource not schedulable | Wrong resource key for the installed device plugin | Confirm the exact key with `kubectl describe node` (search the Allocatable list) and substitute it. |
## Examples
### Example 1: "Our 4-node H100 training run got slow — is RDMA even working?"
The user pastes an `NCCL_DEBUG=INFO` excerpt plus the pod spec. The checker finds `Using
network Socket` and `rdma/ib` only in `requests`, and verdicts:
```text
### VERDICT: RDMA is NOT engaged -- NCCL fell back to TCP (NET/Socket). Multi-node collectives are running over the Ethernet control plane, commonly 5-20x slower for the same GPU-hours -- you pay full GPU rate for a fraction of the throughput, and NCCL raised no error.
- RDMA engaged: **no**
- Transport in use: **Socket**
- Missing conditions (each one alone forces a silent TCP fallback):
- `rdma/ib` missing from resources.limits
- `NCCL_IB_HCA` not set (e.g. `ibp`) -- unless the MPI Operator manages it
**The fix (in order):**
1. Request the RDMA device in BOTH requests AND limits: `rdma/ib: 1` (if it is in only one, the device plugin will not inject the IB device).
2. Set `NCCL_IB_HCA=ibp` and `NCCL_SOCKET_IFNAME=eth0` (CoreWeave values), or let the MPI Operator manage them.
3. Re-run with `NCCL_DEBUG=INFO` and confirm the log now shows `NET/IB` and `GPU Direct RDMA Enabled` -- not `NET/Socket` / `Using network Socket`.
4. Confirm each IB port is `State: Active` / `Physical state: LinkUp` via `ibstat`; a flapping link gets auto-cordoned by CoreWeave.
```
### Example 2: "RDMA is on but all-reduce bandwidth seems low"
The log shows `NET/IB` and `GPU Direct RDMA Enabled`, so the checker returns
`rdma_engaged: yes`. It then surfaces the `ibstat` port that reads `Physical state:
Polling` as a degraded signal and echoes the observed `busbw` tagged `[unverified vs
baseline]`, directing the user to compare against CoreWeave's nccl-tests manifest for their
GPU count + NCCL version rather than a guessed number.
## Resources
- [`references/rdma-engagement-checklist.md`](references/rdma-engagement-checklist.md) — the three required conditions + how to verify each, cited.
- [`references/nccl-debug-reading.md`](references/nccl-debug-reading.md) — reading `NCCL_DEBUG=INFO`: `NET/IB` vs `NET/Socket`, the decisive `Using network` line, GDR.
- [`references/allreduce-baseline.md`](references/allreduce-baseline.md) — `all_reduce_perf` busbw/algbw and why the baseline is never hardcoded.
- Sibling: `coreweave-gpu-cost-leak-hunter` dollarizes idle/right-sizing spend; this skill finds the throughput leak (fabric fallback) that a cost report cannot see.
[cw]: https://docs.coreweave.com/docs/products/networking/hpc-interconnect/use-gpudirect-rdma
[nt]: https://github.com/coreweave/nccl-tests
[nccl]: https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/nccl/user-guide/docs/troubleshooting/networking_troubleshooting.html
[env]: https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/nccl/user-guide/docs/env.html
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!