Skip to content
Back to skills

Appfolio Reference Architecture

ASecurity

'Reference architecture for AppFolio property management integration.

  • 2,719 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 21, 2026
ai-agentstypescriptgobashreactapisecurity

Works with

  • claude code
  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 21, 2026

npx -y skills add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus --skill appfolio-reference-architecture --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Appfolio Reference Architecture?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Appfolio Reference Architecture
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jeremylongshore-appfolio-reference-architecture-f1a1a613/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jeremylongshore-appfolio-reference-architecture-f1a1a613)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: appfolio-reference-architecture
description: 'Reference architecture for AppFolio property management integration.

  Trigger: "appfolio architecture".

  '
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash(npm:*), Bash(curl:*), Grep
version: 1.5.0
license: MIT
author: Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
tags:
- saas
- property-management
- appfolio
- real-estate
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code
---
# AppFolio Reference Architecture

## Overview

Production architecture for property management integrations with the AppFolio Stack API. Designed for multi-property portfolios requiring real-time vacancy tracking, tenant lifecycle management, work order routing, and accounting reconciliation. Key design drivers: data freshness for leasing decisions, idempotent sync for financial accuracy, and tenant-facing portal responsiveness.

## Prerequisites

- A provider-verified contract for endpoints, authentication, events (if any),
  rate limits, data residency, and permitted downstream accounting/CRM effects.
- Separate staging and production environments with managed secrets, synthetic
  fixtures, durable queues/idempotency stores, and named reconciliation owners.
- Data classification that limits dashboard and cache models to the smallest
  permitted fields; tenant contact, payment, and balance data require separate
  encrypted stores and access controls.

## Instructions

1. Build the contract-bound client and safe-read service layer first, with
   endpoint budgets, minimized cache entries, and observability before adding
   write or event processing.
2. Enable provider events only after the contract and durable raw-body,
   signature, persistence, and replay boundaries have been proven; otherwise
   use bounded incremental reconciliation.
3. Persist an idempotency/reconciliation record before any work-order,
   accounting, tenant, or lease mutation and require explicit authorization.
4. Validate the architecture in staging with synthetic data, a forced provider
   failure, duplicate event/retry, and rollback rehearsal before promotion.

## Architecture Diagram

```
Dashboard (React) ──→ Property Service ──→ Redis Cache ──→ AppFolio Stack API
                           ↓                                 /properties
                      Queue (Bull) ──→ Sync Worker           /tenants
                           ↓                                 /leases
                      Event Handler ←── Provider events*      /work-orders
                           ↓                                 /bills
                      Accounting Sync ──→ QuickBooks/Xero
```

`*` Use provider events only when the active contract confirms their delivery
and security semantics; otherwise feed the queue from bounded reconciliation.

## Service Layer

```typescript
class PropertyService {
  constructor(private client: AppFolioClient, private cache: CacheLayer) {}

  async getPortfolioSummary(propertyIds: string[]): Promise<PortfolioSummary> {
    const properties = await Promise.all(
      propertyIds.map(id => this.cache.getOrFetch(`prop:${id}`, () => this.client.get(`/properties/${id}`)))
    );
    return { totalUnits: properties.reduce((sum, p) => sum + p.units.length, 0),
             vacancyRate: this.calcVacancy(properties), pendingWorkOrders: await this.getPendingOrders(propertyIds) };
  }

  async routeWorkOrder(order: WorkOrderRequest): Promise<string> {
    const property = await this.client.get(`/properties/${order.propertyId}`);
    const vendor = this.selectVendor(property.region, order.category);
    return this.client.post('/work-orders', { ...order, assigned_vendor: vendor });
  }
}
```

## Caching Strategy

```typescript
const CACHE_CONFIG = {
  properties: { ttl: 300, prefix: 'prop' },     // 5 min — changes infrequently
  tenants:    { ttl: 120, prefix: 'tenant' },    // 2 min — moderate churn
  leases:     { ttl: 60,  prefix: 'lease' },     // 1 min — financial accuracy
  workOrders: { ttl: 30,  prefix: 'wo' },        // 30s — real-time tracking
  vacancies:  { ttl: 15,  prefix: 'vacancy' },   // 15s — leasing speed matters
};
// Webhook-driven invalidation: AppFolio events flush matching cache keys immediately
```

## Event Pipeline

```typescript
class PropertyEventPipeline {
  private queue = new Bull('appfolio-events', { redis: process.env.REDIS_URL });

  async onWebhook(event: AppFolioEvent): Promise<void> {
    await this.queue.add(event.type, event, { attempts: 3, backoff: { type: 'exponential', delay: 2000 } });
  }

  async processLeaseEvent(event: LeaseEvent): Promise<void> {
    if (event.type === 'lease.signed') await this.updateVacancy(event.propertyId);
    if (event.type === 'lease.terminated') await this.triggerMoveOutWorkflow(event);
  }

  async processWorkOrderEvent(event: WorkOrderEvent): Promise<void> {
    if (event.status === 'completed') await this.reconcileVendorInvoice(event);
  }
}
```

## Data Model

```typescript
interface Property { id: string; name: string; address: Address; units: Unit[]; region: string; }
interface TenantRef { id: string; leaseId: string; contactCiphertextRef: string; }
interface Lease    { id: string; propertyId: string; unitId: string; tenantId: string; startDate: string; endDate: string; monthlyRent: number; status: 'active' | 'pending' | 'terminated'; }
interface WorkOrder { id: string; propertyId: string; unitId: string; category: 'plumbing' | 'electrical' | 'hvac' | 'general'; status: string; assignedVendor: string; }
```

## Scaling Considerations

- Partition sync workers by property region to avoid cross-region API rate limits
- Use read replicas for dashboard queries; write path goes through event pipeline
- Batch tenant notifications (rent reminders, maintenance updates) via queue to avoid email rate limits
- Cache vacancy data aggressively — leasing agents hit this endpoint 10x more than any other
- Shard work order routing by property portfolio to enable independent scaling per management group

## Error Handling

| Component | Failure Mode | Recovery |
|-----------|-------------|----------|
| Property sync | AppFolio 429 rate limit | Exponential backoff with jitter, per-property circuit breaker |
| Lease webhook | Duplicate event delivery | Idempotency key on lease ID + event timestamp |
| Work order routing | Vendor API timeout | Queue retry with fallback to manual assignment |
| Accounting sync | Balance mismatch | Reconciliation queue with human review flag |
| Tenant portal | Cache miss storm | Stale-while-revalidate pattern, circuit breaker on API layer |

## Output

- A contract-bound, staged architecture with service, cache, queue, data, and
  reconciliation ownership explicitly separated
- Minimized dashboard references and encrypted/controlled boundaries for tenant
  contact, payment, and balance data
- A deployment decision supported by staging failure, duplicate/replay, rate,
  rollback, and reconciliation evidence

## Examples

For a vacancy-dashboard rollout, start with synthetic property and unit IDs,
one bounded safe-read, and a cache that exposes data age. Inject a duplicate
event or reconciliation record, a `429`, and a downstream accounting timeout
to prove the queue and idempotency store prevent duplicate effects. Promote
only when results remain complete and authorized and the rollback/reconciliation
owners can demonstrate their paths. If event support, data classification,
durable state, or a write outcome is unverified, keep the corresponding path
disabled and use operator-led reconciliation.

## Resources

- [AppFolio Stack APIs](https://www.appfolio.com/stack/partners/api)
- [AppFolio Engineering Blog](https://engineering.appfolio.com)

## Next Steps

See `appfolio-deploy-integration`.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.