Use when writing user-facing release notes for a software product release
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add jeffreytse/grimoire-core --skill write-release-note --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Write Release Note?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jeffreytse-write-release-note)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: write-release-note
description: Use when writing user-facing release notes for a software product release
source: Stripe Developer Documentation style guide; GitHub Release Notes guidelines; Apple App Store release note best practices
tags: [release-notes, product, documentation, communication, changelog]
verified: true
---
# Write Release Note
Write concise, user-focused release notes that communicate value and impact, not implementation details.
## Why This Is Best Practice
**Adopted by:** Stripe (benchmark for developer communication), GitHub (model for technical release notes), Apple App Store (mandated format for consumer apps)
**Impact:** Stripe's documentation is cited as the industry standard for developer experience; well-written release notes reduce support ticket volume by 15-25% after major releases (per Intercom product research).
**Why best:** Release notes are a product communication artifact, not a technical log. Users care about what changed for them, not how it was implemented. Stripe's impact-first pattern ("You can now do X") and GitHub's contextual notes (linking to docs for complex changes) set the bar for technical audiences.
## Steps
1. **Lead with user benefit** — Start with what users can now do or no longer need to worry about. Not "Refactored auth module" but "Login is now 40% faster and supports passkeys."
2. **Group by impact type** — Use consistent categories: New, Improved, Fixed, Security, Breaking Changes. Order: New → Improved → Fixed → Security → Breaking.
3. **Write one sentence per item** — State the change and its user impact. Link to documentation for anything requiring more than one sentence.
4. **Highlight breaking changes prominently** — Use a visible header or warning; describe what breaks and provide the migration path or link to the migration guide.
5. **Target the right audience** — Developer-facing APIs: include code examples for breaking changes. Consumer apps: plain language, no jargon, benefit-oriented.
6. **Include version and date** — Always: version number, release date, and relevant links (full changelog, migration guide, docs).
7. **Review for jargon** — Read as a non-expert user; replace internal terms with plain language equivalents.
## Rules
- Every breaking change must be explicitly labeled and include a migration path.
- Security fixes must be included; describe the class of vulnerability (not the exploit detail) and advise users to upgrade.
- Omit implementation details (refactors, dependency bumps, internal tooling) unless they affect users.
- Use present or future tense for new features ("You can now..."), past tense for fixes ("Fixed an issue where...").
## Examples
Good (Stripe-style):
> **New:** Webhooks now support retry configuration. You can set custom retry intervals and maximum attempts per endpoint in the Dashboard or via API.
>
> **Fixed:** The invoice PDF download failed for invoices with non-ASCII characters in the customer name. This is now resolved.
>
> **Breaking:** The `charge.create` endpoint no longer accepts `source` as a bare card object. Pass a `PaymentMethod` ID instead. [Migration guide →]
## Common Mistakes
- **"Various bug fixes and performance improvements"** — tells users nothing; enumerate specific fixes.
- **Commit message verbatim** — developer-oriented messages lack context for users.
- **Omitting the "so what"** — "Added retry logic" → who cares; "Failed webhook deliveries are now retried automatically for 72 hours" → clear user value.
## When NOT to Use
- When the release contains only internal refactors, dependency upgrades, or infrastructure changes that have no observable effect on user behavior, publishing a release note creates noise without informing any user decision.
- When the change is a hotfix for an actively exploited security vulnerability, publish a minimal security advisory through your coordinated disclosure process instead of a detailed release note that could aid attackers before users patch.
- When the audience is exclusively internal engineering teams consuming an internal library with no external contract, a commit log or internal Slack post is sufficient; a polished user-facing release note format is mismatched to the audience.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!