Use when verifying that a process follows all required steps before completion or handoff.
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add jeffreytse/grimoire-core --skill minimal --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Minimal?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jeffreytse-minimal)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: review-checklist
description: Use when verifying that a process follows all required steps before completion or handoff.
source: FAA Aviation Safety Checklists, WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (Haynes et al., NEJM 2009)
tags: [quality-assurance, checklist, process, error-reduction]
---
# Review Checklist
Systematically verify every required step before signing off on a process.
## Why This Is Best Practice
**Adopted by:** Aviation (FAA mandatory pre-flight checklists), surgery (WHO Surgical
Safety Checklist adopted by 4,000+ hospitals), NASA Mission Control, nuclear power
(NRC operating procedures), and all industries where step omission causes irreversible
failure.
**Impact:** WHO Surgical Safety Checklist reduced surgical complications by 36% and deaths
by 47% across 8 hospitals in 8 countries (Haynes et al., NEJM 2009, n=3,733 patients).
Aviation accident rates dropped from 40+ fatal accidents per million flights (1950s) to
under 0.2 by 2000 — checklists identified as primary contributor (NTSB longitudinal data).
**Why best:** Human memory under time pressure is unreliable. External checklists eliminate
recall failures — the root cause of ~70% of aviation accidents before adoption. No
alternative (experience, expertise, vigilance) achieves the same error-reduction rate.
Sources: WHO Surgical Safety Checklist 2009, FAA Advisory Circular AC 120-21, NTSB
## Steps
1. List every required step in sequence before beginning the process.
2. Check each step immediately after performing it — not from memory after the fact.
3. If a step fails or cannot be confirmed, halt and resolve before proceeding.
4. Have a second person verify critical steps independently (two-person rule).
5. Record the completed checklist: who verified, when, and any deviations noted.
## Rules
- Never check off a step not yet performed — even under time pressure.
- Keep checklists short enough to complete in under 5 minutes; split longer processes.
- Review the checklist itself annually to ensure steps reflect current practice.
- Do not let familiarity breed complacency — treat each checklist as a live document.
## Common Mistakes
- Checking off steps from memory after completing a block — defeats the purpose.
- Using the checklist only for documentation, not as a real-time verification tool.
- Adding too many items until it becomes noise rather than a gate.
- Skipping the checklist when "everything is obviously fine" — the process assumes fallibility.
## When NOT to Use
- When the process has a single step with no sequencing dependencies and no meaningful failure modes.
- When operating in a free-form creative exploration phase where rigid sequencing inhibits discovery.
- When the checklist itself has not been validated against the actual process it covers.

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!