Skip to content
Back to skills

Sprint Rev

ASecurity

Review Sprints v2 work and whole-Sprint conformance — own review, re-enter, abort, and conclude judgments, author the conformance and Sprint reports, and direct safety actions through durable messages.

  • 28 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 3, 2026
ai-agentsgoshellsecurity

Works with

  • terminal

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 7, 2026

npx -y skills add jedbjorn/subfloor --skill sprint_rev --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Sprint Rev?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Sprint Rev
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jedbjorn-sprint-rev/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jedbjorn-sprint-rev)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: sprint_rev
description: Review Sprints v2 work and whole-Sprint conformance — own review, re-enter, abort, and conclude judgments, author the conformance and Sprint reports, and direct safety actions through durable messages.
category: workflow
common: false
---

# sprint_rev — independent review and conformance

Load `sprint_protocol` first; it holds the lifecycle, wake types, inbox
commands, relay contract, body limits, artifact paths, receipt recovery, and
authority boundary. This skill holds only the Reviewer's steps: pre-declaration
QA/QC, one work-unit review, or whole-Sprint conformance.

## Route the entry

| Entry | Route |
|---|---|
| Explicit pre-declaration QA/QC request | Read and sign the exact current spec directly; there is no Sprint id or Sprint inbox yet. |
| Work-unit review / `sprint.delivery_terminal` | Inspect the Sprint inbox once; accept the actionable request. |
| Live FnB instruction | Preserve board-level authority; read only durable state needed for independent judgment. |

QA/QC precedes all Sprint inbox commands and is one write:

```text
sc mem doc qaqc <spec-document-id> --verdict pass|fail [--findings-doc <document-id>]
```

Reviewers never receive PR-event wakes.

## Conformance decisions and Planner controls

You own review, re-enter, abort, and conclude judgments. The Planner
independently owns operational plan structure: safe-edit pauses, recalling
unreleased work, lane changes/repeats, assignment/routing, unreleased-scope
cancellation, and validated resume. Never run standalone pause, replan,
recall, reroute, cancel, resume, complete, or abort actions; clean
`record-conformance` alone performs its narrow atomic close.

Base judgment on durable Sprint state, bound revisions, current work/PR facts,
progress-carrier evidence, and ratified judgments. A decision body names:

- `decision`: `re-enter`, `abort`, or the exact safety-critical recommendation;
- Reviewer-owned evidence + rationale;
- exact Sprint/unit ids, reason, outcome, and complete action arguments;
- immediate safety impact for FnB.

The Planner verifies your identity and executes the transition without
surrendering plan authority. A rejected action requires a revised judgment
supported by returned durable state, never an improvised bypass. A live FnB
instruction is the FnB's board-level override.

## Severity rubric

- **Critical** — active security/authority violation, destructive corruption,
  or unsafe continued operation.
- **Major** — wrong behavior, data loss, broken invariant, material spec
  violation, or silently wedged delivery/recovery.
- **Medium** — concrete normal-use correctness/recovery gap, missing negative
  enforcement, or unreliable handoff.
- **Low** — bounded cleanup, clarity, test-depth, or resilience improvement;
  delivered behavior remains correct.

Critical/Major/Medium block unit approval; Low is a report note. At closeout,
severity does not decide timing: you judge whether each finding requires
in-Sprint patching or acceptable post-Sprint follow-up.

## Work-unit review

Accept the request and retain that exact message id. Its body is a bare
locator: intent, PR URL, registered PR id, exact head, work-unit id. Scope
narrative, verification, rationale, or focus steering is a protocol defect. PR
comments and annotations are forbidden; the PR body contains only unit id +
spec reference plus the Developer's rationale.

Bind inspection/verdict to the accepted request's message id, registered PR,
and work unit. Review the live PR head; a rebase since the locator's head is
not a defect. Read the exact spec revision + full diff, then checks, tests,
relevant runtime facts, and ratified judgments. Each round is clean: no prior
Developer evidence or prose; prior findings clear only when the new head
proves it. Trace code paths, failure cases, and spec behavior rather than
names or PR prose.

### Red-check doctrine

Accepted-red is not a legal review outcome. A departure that leaves checks
failing is never acceptable; the handoff remains green-only, without exception
or waiver: do not note the failure and approve anyway.

- In-scope failure -> record `changes_requested` so the Developer fixes them and restores green.
- Out-of-scope failure -> keep the lane unapproved and send the Planner a `replan`
  decision naming the failures; Planner widens the lane or cuts follow-up work.

Read cited and feature-scoped resolved flag evidence through memory
(`sc mem get flags <flag-id>`, `sc mem get flags --feature <id> --resolved`).

Each finding pins severity/title, violated invariant, exact location/evidence,
reproducible consequence, and fix boundary without unnecessary architecture.

Complete a unit verdict in this exact order:

1. Finish every inspection, finding, and verdict body.
2. Re-run `sc sprint inbox --sprint <id>` once; handle + `accept` new items.
3. Run `wc -m < <path>`; require near 6,000 and below 8,000 characters.
4. As the literal final action, run:

```text
sc sprint record-review \
  --sprint <id> --registered-pr <registered-id> \
  --verdict changes_requested|approved --body-file <path> --key <stable-key>
```

5. Require durable judgment evidence + the Developer wake. Run no trailing
   command; stop.

Use `approved` only with no Critical/Major/Medium finding. Engine validation
requires the accepted request. Do not message around the surface; an
unrecorded verdict cannot unlock merge.

## Delivery-terminal closeout

Retain the exact notification message id + delivered wake as this closeout
episode's identity. Proceed only when the notification names this shell as the
selected conformance owner for its current ownership generation. A different
Reviewer accepts the informational notification if received and records no
conformance. Inspect inbox, lifecycle, and units first:

- Already completed/aborted -> `accept` notification and stop.
- Any non-terminal unit visible -> the wake is stale: `accept`, stop, and
  await a fresh delivery-terminal episode.
- Only an armed Sprint whose units are all terminal enters conformance.

Compile the bounded evidence packet first, yourself:

```text
sc sprint compile-report --sprint <id> --limit 50 \
  > shared/sprints/sprint-<n>/evidence.json
```

Increase only when truncation omitted needed evidence; maximum 200. Judge
integrated `main` against every bound/current revision + ratified judgment. All
units cancelled and nothing shipped -> `abort`, not `conclude`.

Choose one branch:

- **In-Sprint patching required.** Do not run `record-conformance`. Send the
  Planner a durable `re-enter` decision with every blocking finding; each spec
  task's title and description; grouping, waves, dependencies, routing, and
  capacity rationale. State independent lanes, expected review overlap, useful
  reserve, and critical-path effect. After three re-entry episodes, escalate
  non-convergence to FnB.
- **Clean or post-Sprint-only findings.** Prepare conformance report,
  final report, reason, and outcome; submit the atomic close below. Send no
  conclude message.

## Whole-Sprint conformance

Review the integrated system, not unit diffs. Classify every requirement
`as-specced`, `deviated-intentionally` with ratified judgment,
`deviated-silently`, or `unimplemented`; the last two are findings. Include
spec document + work-unit ids when known.

For the clean branch, write findings directly in the conformance report.
Keep the report near 6,000 and below 8,000 characters; run `wc -m < <report>`.

Before recording conformance, author the final Sprint report. Name yourself as
author and cover governing scope/revisions, shipped units/PRs, judgments +
ratified deviations, failures/retries/recovery/anomalies, conclusion,
follow-ups, and evidence location. Keep it near 6,000 and below 8,000; preserve
discrepancies.

Record one atomic final write:

```text
sc sprint record-conformance \
  --sprint <id> --body-file <report> \
  --final-report-file <final-report> --reason <reason> --outcome <outcome> \
  --key <stable-pass-key>
```

Require the receipt: conformance report id, final report id,
completed state, Planner message id, and Planner wake id. Closing ends the
Developer chats and schedules deletion of the Sprint artifact directory; your
chat persists and no worktree is reset. Do not poll cleanup, wait before
stopping, or manually close peer chats. Never reopen editing after recording;
a re-enter defers reports until new scope is terminal and a fresh
delivery-terminal wake arrives.

## Stop

Unit review ends with the ordered `record-review` write as the literal final
action.

For closeout, first re-run `sc sprint inbox --sprint <id>`, handle + `accept`
new messages, then confirm every artifact/body is final and below 8,000.

- Clean conclude -> run the atomic `record-conformance` command above as the
  literal final action. When it confirms completed state and all receipt
  identities, stop immediately; the Planner is notified.
- Re-enter/abort -> as literal final action send the Sprint-level `decision`
  to the Planner (relay form in `sprint_protocol`), require durable write +
  Planner wake, then stop immediately. Run no trailing command until another
  native wake.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.