Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Sponsors
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Know which skills are safe — weekly.
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Is that skill safe to install?
Are you the author of Principle Prove It Works?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jaydubya818-principle-prove-it-works)
---
name: principle-prove-it-works
description: "Apply when the actual candidate and observable result still need verification."
license: MIT
metadata:
author: jstack-maintainers
source: michael-denyer/pstack-claude
source-version: "0.9.130"
source-commit: d88063f3355a5ecff0e6dbb890a11bab4b08bc2e
owner: software-factory
risk: low
capabilities: jstack,engineering-principle
user-invocable: false
---
# Prove It Works
Verify every task output by checking the real thing directly. Do not infer from proxies, self-reports, or "it compiles."
**Why:** Unverified work has unknown correctness. Indirect verification (file mtimes, output freshness, agent self-reports, cached screenshots) feels cheaper than direct observation. Acting on a wrong inference costs far more than checking the source.
Check the real thing, not a proxy:
- Check process liveness directly, not indirectly through derived state
- Read the actual value, not a cached or derived representation
- When verification fails, suspect the observation method before suspecting the system
- Before you report success (merged, sent, started), read the real state and the exit code. Truncated output (`| tail -1`) and your own echo prove nothing
Verify the process as well as the outcome. A correct result can rest on a broken process, and a review that checks results passes it: a clause reconstructed from the user's paste instead of the durable record, a constraint honored by chance from a file never read. For each fact you relied on, name the record it came from and confirm that record is the one the project's rules point at.
Red is a colour, not a measurement. A failing check proves the instrument only when the failure content is the disagreement you predicted. An exception, an empty collection against a non-empty literal, and a real mismatch all print red, so quote the assertion's diff (`Extra items in the right set`), never the assertion (`assert {...} == {...}`). A convergence probe keys on behavior only the new artifact can produce, never an identity field the old one also emits. A same-SHA restart lets old code report the new commit SHA.
## Script the check when you can
The strongest proof is a deterministic script that re-runs the same comparison, not a one-time eyeball. Write the script, run it, and keep its output as an artifact a reviewer can re-run instead of trusting your word.
Keep the artifact visible for the human. Commit it only for large or complex work where the trail has to be auditable later, like a big port or migration (the **show-me-your-work** skill).