Gap-assess an organization or system against a compliance framework (SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, NIST CSF/800-53), mapping controls to evidence, identifying gaps, and producing a prioritized remediation and audit-readiness plan. Use for compliance gap analysis, certification prep, or audit readiness.
Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding
Scanned 9/19/2026
npx -y skills add jassics/awesome-claude-security --skill compliance-assessment --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Compliance Assessment?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jassics-compliance-assessment)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: compliance-assessment
description: >-
Gap-assess an organization or system against a compliance framework (SOC 2, ISO
27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, NIST CSF/800-53), mapping controls to evidence,
identifying gaps, and producing a prioritized remediation and audit-readiness plan.
Use for compliance gap analysis, certification prep, or audit readiness.
---
# Goal
A clear picture of where the org stands against the chosen framework: which controls
are met, partial, or missing; the evidence for each; and a prioritized path to
compliant + audit-ready.
# Steps
1. **Scope & framework** — pick the framework(s) and define scope (systems, data,
business units, the audit boundary). See `reference.md` for a per-framework map.
2. **Map controls** — enumerate the framework's controls/requirements; map each to
the org's existing controls and the **evidence** that demonstrates it (policy,
config, logs, tickets, attestations).
3. **Assess each control** — Met / Partial / Not met, with the evidence or the gap.
Be honest; reuse outputs from the operational plugins as technical evidence
(e.g. `cloud-security`, `sast-sca`, `detection-engineering`).
4. **Identify gaps & risk** — for each gap, the control intent, the exposure it
leaves (link `risk-assessment`), and the effort to close.
5. **Prioritize remediation** — by risk and by audit deadline; assign owners and
target dates.
6. **Audit readiness** — organize evidence, dry-run control testing, and a remediation
tracker an auditor can follow.
# Output
A compliance gap analysis: control · requirement · status · evidence · gap · owner ·
priority · target date, plus a remediation roadmap and an evidence index. Use
`security-reporting`; visualize control coverage with `security-diagramming`.
# Notes
Compliance ≠ security, but done well it raises the floor — map controls to *real*
evidence, not aspirational policy. Many frameworks overlap heavily (ISO 27001, SOC 2,
NIST); assess once and map to several to avoid duplicate work. Verify the current
version of each framework. Track gaps with owners and dates — an audit is a deadline.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!