Look up MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations, and map an observed behavior, finding, or detection to the right technique ID(s). Use whenever work needs a consistent ATT&CK reference — detection coverage, threat reports, red-team TTP planning, or tagging a finding.
Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding
Scanned 9/19/2026
npx -y skills add jassics/awesome-claude-security --skill attack-lookup --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Attack Lookup?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jassics-attack-lookup)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: attack-lookup
description: >-
Look up MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations, and map an observed
behavior, finding, or detection to the right technique ID(s). Use whenever work
needs a consistent ATT&CK reference — detection coverage, threat reports, red-team
TTP planning, or tagging a finding.
---
# Goal
Correct, consistent ATT&CK references — the right tactic + technique ID(s) for a
behavior — so detections, reports, and emulation across the team all speak the same
language.
# Steps
1. **Classify the behavior** by adversary goal → that's the **tactic** (the "why":
Initial Access, Execution, Persistence, … Impact).
2. **Find the technique** under that tactic that matches the "how"; pick the
sub-technique when one fits (e.g., T1059.001 PowerShell under T1059
Command and Scripting Interpreter). See `reference.md` for the tactic list and
common techniques.
3. **Map to mitigations/data sources** when relevant — what detects or prevents it
(feeds `detection-engineering`).
4. **Cite precisely** — technique ID + name, and note the ATT&CK version/domain
(Enterprise/Mobile/ICS). For anything beyond the common set, verify the current ID
against attack.mitre.org rather than guessing — IDs and sub-technique structure
change between versions.
# Output
The matched tactic(s) + technique ID(s) with names, optional mitigation/data-source
pointers, and a one-line rationale for the mapping. For coverage gap analysis use
`detection-engineering:detection-coverage-review`; for actor TTP sets use
`threat-intelligence`.
# Notes
ATT&CK is a living matrix — don't trust a memorized ID for an obscure technique;
confirm against the current version. Map to the most specific sub-technique that's
actually supported by evidence; over-precise tagging is as misleading as vague tagging.
See `reference.md` for the tactic taxonomy and frequently used techniques.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!