Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Artifact Provenance Verification

ASecurity

Assess and establish build artifact provenance and integrity — SLSA provenance level, signing/attestation (Sigstore/cosign, in-toto), and verification at deploy/admission. Use when you need to prove an artifact (container image, package, binary) came from the expected source and build, untampered.

8 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 9/19/2026
ai-agentsrustgosecurity

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/19/2026

$npx -y skills add jassics/awesome-claude-security --skill artifact-provenance-verification --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Artifact Provenance Verification?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Artifact Provenance Verification
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jassics-artifact-provenance-verification/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jassics-artifact-provenance-verification)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: artifact-provenance-verification
description: >-
  Assess and establish build artifact provenance and integrity — SLSA provenance
  level, signing/attestation (Sigstore/cosign, in-toto), and verification at
  deploy/admission. Use when you need to prove an artifact (container image,
  package, binary) came from the expected source and build, untampered.
---

# Goal

A clear picture of an artifact's provenance maturity and a path to "only verified,
attested artifacts are deployed" — so a tampered or unknown-origin artifact can't
reach production.

# Frame against SLSA

Map the build/artifact flow to a **SLSA** build level and identify the next gap:

- **L1** — provenance exists (build is scripted, provenance generated).
- **L2** — provenance is signed and from a hosted build service.
- **L3** — build runs on hardened, isolated infrastructure; provenance is
  non-forgeable. This is the meaningful bar for tamper resistance.

# Steps

1. **Inventory trust signals** — is the artifact signed? By what identity
   (keyless/OIDC via Sigstore, or a managed key)? Is there a provenance attestation
   (in-toto / SLSA) linking artifact ↔ source commit ↔ builder?
2. **Verify the chain** — source → build → artifact → registry → deploy. Confirm the
   signing identity and provenance are checked, not just present.
3. **Find the enforcement gap** — is verification *required* at admission/deploy
   (e.g., cosign verify in an admission controller / policy gate), or merely
   available? Unverified-but-signed is theater.
4. **Recommend** — signing in CI (keyless preferred), provenance generation,
   verification policy at the gate, and key/identity trust roots + revocation.

# Output

A provenance assessment: current SLSA level · signing/attestation state · where
verification is (and isn't) enforced · prioritized steps to the next level. Pair with
`pipeline-integrity-review` for the build side and `security-diagramming` for the
chain-of-custody diagram.

# Notes

Signing without enforced verification buys nothing — the control is the *gate that
rejects unverified artifacts*. Keyless (OIDC/Fulcio) signing avoids long-lived key
management and is the modern default. Provenance must bind artifact → exact source
commit → builder, or it can't prove "this came from that build."

Attribution

jassicsjassics
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from jassics →
SSkills Directory ProSkills Directory

Get any skill into Claude in one click.

Download any skill as a ZIP for Claude.ai, Claude Desktop, or .claude/skills. $9/mo.

See Pro

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills Directory ProSkills Directory

Get any skill into Claude in one click.

Download any skill as a ZIP for Claude.ai, Claude Desktop, or .claude/skills. $9/mo.

See Pro

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

696561 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes
View all in ai-agents →