'Write warm, direct collaboration comments. Trigger: PR feedback, issue
Scanned 9/10/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add JantonioFC/skillsbank --skill comment-writer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Comment Writer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jantoniofc-comment-writer)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: comment-writer
description: 'Write warm, direct collaboration comments. Trigger: PR feedback, issue
replies, reviews, Slack messages, or GitHub comments.'
license: Apache-2.0
metadata:
author: gentleman-programming
version: '1.0'
---
## When to Use
Load this skill whenever you write a comment that another human will read.
Use it for:
- GitHub PR or issue comments.
- Review feedback and requested changes.
- Maintainer replies.
- Slack, Discord, or async project updates.
## Voice Rules
| Rule | Requirement |
|------|-------------|
| Be useful fast | Start with the actionable point. Do not recap the whole PR before feedback. |
| Be warm and direct | Sound like a thoughtful teammate, not a corporate bot. |
| Keep it short | Prefer 1 to 3 short paragraphs or a tight bullet list. |
| Explain why | Give the technical reason when asking for a change. |
| Avoid pile-ons | Comment on the highest-value issue, not every tiny preference. |
| Match thread language | Write in the same language the thread uses. For regional tone and style, defer to the active persona — do not inject regional expressions (e.g. voseo) on your own. |
| No em dashes | Use commas, periods, or parentheses instead. |
## Comment Formula
```text
<Direct observation or request>
<Why it matters, only if needed>
<Concrete next action>
```
## Examples
### Request change
```markdown
Good approach overall. I'd split this into a separate commit because it mixes validation logic with UI wiring.
That keeps the reviewer's focus narrower and makes rollback cleaner if the integration fails.
```
### Approve with a note
```markdown
Approved. The scope is clear and the change is well-contained.
For the next PR, add links to the previous and following PRs so the chain stays navigable.
```
### Ask for split
```markdown
This PR exceeds the 400-line budget, so we need to split it or justify `size:exception`.
Suggested order: foundation + tests first, then integration, then docs. That gives each review a clear start and end.
```
## Commands
```bash
# Inspect a PR before writing review feedback
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json title,body,additions,deletions,changedFiles
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!