'Design docs that reduce cognitive load. Trigger: writing guides, READMEs,
Scanned 9/10/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add JantonioFC/skillsbank --skill cognitive-doc-design --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Cognitive Doc Design?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jantoniofc-cognitive-doc-design)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: cognitive-doc-design
description: 'Design docs that reduce cognitive load. Trigger: writing guides, READMEs,
RFCs, onboarding, architecture, or review-facing docs.'
license: Apache-2.0
metadata:
author: gentleman-programming
version: '1.0'
---
## When to Use
Load this skill when creating or editing documentation that people need to understand quickly, retain, or use during review.
Use it especially for:
- PR descriptions and review notes.
- Contributor or maintainer guides.
- Architecture, workflow, or onboarding docs.
- Any doc that currently feels long, dense, or hard to scan.
## Critical Patterns
| Pattern | Rule |
|---------|------|
| Lead with the answer | Put the decision, action, or outcome first. Context comes after. |
| Progressive disclosure | Start with the happy path, then add details, edge cases, and references. |
| Chunking | Group related information into small sections. Keep flat lists short. |
| Signposting | Use headings, labels, callouts, and summaries so readers know where they are. |
| Recognition over recall | Prefer tables, checklists, examples, and templates over prose that must be remembered. |
| Review empathy | Design docs so reviewers can verify intent without reconstructing the whole story. |
## Documentation Shape
Use this default structure unless the repo already provides a stronger template:
```markdown
# <Outcome-oriented title>
<One paragraph: what changed, who it helps, and why it matters.>
## Quick path
1. <First action>
2. <Second action>
3. <Verification or expected result>
## Details
| Topic | Decision |
|-------|----------|
| <area> | <concise explanation> |
## Checklist
- [ ] <Reader can confirm this>
- [ ] <Reader can confirm that>
## Next step
<Link or action that continues the workflow.>
```
## PR and Review Docs
When documenting a PR, reduce reviewer burnout by making the review path explicit:
- State what to review first.
- State what is intentionally out of scope.
- Link the previous and next PR when work is chained.
- Keep each section focused on one decision or unit of work.
- Use checklists for acceptance criteria and verification.
## Commands
```bash
# Check markdown files changed in the current branch
git diff --name-only -- '*.md'
# Inspect PR changed-line count for cognitive load
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json additions,deletions,changedFiles
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!