OpenClaw skill for source-backed web search, page reading, and evidence-aware claim checking. Use it to verify factual answers with live search results and explicit source handling.
Scanned 5/27/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install InternLM/WildClawBench---
name: cross-validated-search
version: "16.0.0"
description: >
OpenClaw skill for source-backed web search, page reading, and evidence-aware claim checking.
Use it to verify factual answers with live search results and explicit source handling.
homepage: https://github.com/wd041216-bit/cross-validated-search
---
# Cross-Validated Search for OpenClaw
This skill gives OpenClaw a practical verification workflow:
- `search-web` for live search results
- `browse-page` for reading the full content of a source
- `verify-claim` for support/conflict classification
- `evidence-report` for a citation-ready summary with next steps
## Install
```bash
pip install cross-validated-search
```
## Minimum verification
```bash
search-web "OpenAI API pricing" --type news --timelimit w
verify-claim "Python 3.13 is the latest stable release" --deep --max-pages 2 --json
evidence-report "Python 3.13 stable release" --claim "Python 3.13 is the latest stable release" --deep --json
```
## Recommended flow
1. Run `search-web` for factual or recent questions.
2. Use `browse-page` on the most relevant source when snippets are not enough.
3. Use `verify-claim` when a concrete claim needs a support/conflict summary.
4. Use `evidence-report` when you want a compact evidence package with citations and next steps.
5. Use `--deep` when the claim matters enough to justify page-aware verification.
6. Cite the returned URLs in the final answer.
## What success looks like
- the verdict is explicit
- the result includes support and conflict scores
- `page_aware` is true when deep verification ran
- the recommended free path is `ddgs + self-hosted searxng`
- source URLs are ready to cite
## Limits
- `verify-claim` is heuristic and evidence-aware, not a proof engine.
- The default provider path is `ddgs`.
- The recommended free upgrade path is self-hosted `searxng` via `CROSS_VALIDATED_SEARCH_SEARXNG_URL`.
- Conflicting sources are surfaced, not automatically reconciled.
## License
MIT License.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
**Complete production-ready guide for Google Gemini embeddings API** This skill provides comprehensive coverage of the `gemini-embedding-001` model for generating text embeddings, including SDK usage, REST API patterns, batch processing, RAG integration with Cloudflare Vectorize, and advanced use cases like semantic search and document clustering. ---
Interview, source-challenge, verify, save, and ADR-gate fuzzy coding requests into Codex-ready implementation specs. Use when a feature, bugfix, refactor, migration, repo-wide change, or architecture task needs user-verified requirements, source-backed decisions, durable architecture decisions, acceptance criteria, validation commands, rollout notes, saved spec/ADR files, and a Codex execution prompt. Do not use when already fully specified or when the user wants direct implementation now.
Use when a repo needs CodeGraph plus ast-grep for Codex MCP setup, exploration, impact analysis, structural search, or safe refactor planning.