Skip to content
Back to skills

Review

ASecurity

Review the current git diff for correctness and adherence to repo standards

  • 10 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 19, 2026
ai-agentsgitsecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 19, 2026

npx -y skills add initxy/noeta --skill review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/initxy-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/initxy-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: review
description: Review the current git diff for correctness and adherence to repo standards
argument-hint: [base ref or scope, e.g. "since main" or a file path]
---

# Review changes

Act as an expert code reviewer for the current working changes. Be concise but
thorough, and focus on what actually matters.

Take the scope / base ref from the conversation; with none given, review the
uncommitted changes.

## Steps

1. Establish the diff. Run `git_status` to see what changed, then `git_diff` to read
   the actual hunks. If the user named a base ref (e.g. `main`), pass it to `git_diff`
   so you compare against that point instead of just unstaged changes.
2. For any hunk you cannot judge in isolation, `read` the surrounding code and
   `grep` for callers, related tests, and existing conventions so your review reflects
   real repo context rather than guesses.
3. Report along two axes:
   - **Correctness** — logic errors, edge cases, error handling, concurrency, data
     loss, security issues, and whether tests cover the change.
   - **Standards** — does it match this repo's existing conventions, naming, structure,
     and style? Cite the convention you're comparing against.
4. For each finding give: file + location, what's wrong, why it matters, and a concrete
   suggested fix. Separate must-fix issues from optional nits. If something is fine,
   say so briefly rather than padding.

Do not modify code in this review — only report. Keep the output skimmable with clear
sections and bullet points.

(fork agent: general-purpose)

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…