Package a verified infographic demo for the public gallery and, after explicit user opt-in, prepare a community pull request without merging it.
Scanned 9/1/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add imMamdouhaboammar/linkedin-animated-infographics --skill share-demo --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Share Demo?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/immamdouhaboammar-share-demo)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: share-demo
description: Package a verified infographic demo for the public gallery and, after explicit user opt-in, prepare a community pull request without merging it.
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: "[build directory] [optional metadata]"
---
# /linkedin-animated-infographics:share-demo
## Purpose
Run the focused parent workflow for publishing a finished infographic to the repository community gallery. This is a public data-export boundary, not part of normal delivery. Read `helper/GUIDE.md` before execution and keep all GitHub writes behind explicit opt-in.
The public demo contract is exactly `demo.gif + index.html + demo.json`. `demos/catalog.json` is generated separately and is never a fourth file inside a demo directory.
## Use when
Use this focused workflow only when a user explicitly agrees to share a finished demo with the community, or directly asks to publish a previously verified result. The normal `new-post` parent workflow may offer this after delivery only when final verification PASS has already been recorded.
Do not invoke this workflow merely because a GIF was generated. Declining the offer, giving no consent, or asking only for local output causes no GitHub write.
## Inputs
Required inputs:
- explicit opt-in to public community sharing
- `build/post.html` or another explicitly selected final verified HTML artifact
- `build/post.gif` or another explicitly selected final verified GIF artifact
- `build/verification-report.json` with final verdict `PASS`
- GitHub username and matching public author URL
- demo title and short description
- language, story type, and tags
- explicit rights confirmation covering the submitted HTML, GIF, and redistributable assets
- chosen public license
Optional inputs:
- source prompt, only when the user separately consents to publishing it
- source repository URL
- short public notes
## Outputs
The parent workflow produces:
- `build/community-demo.json` containing the approved public metadata
- `build/community-demo-package` containing the staged three-file package
- on successful GitHub publication, a pull request URL against `imMamdouhaboammar/linkedin-animated-infographics:main`
- on unavailable GitHub write access, a precise HOLD plus the validated local contribution package and manual commands when the host can prepare them safely
A PR URL is required before reporting GitHub publication as successful. Creating files locally is not equivalent to opening a pull request.
## Procedure
1. Confirm **explicit opt-in**. Ask one direct question if consent is not already explicit. Do not infer consent from enthusiasm, prior GitHub use, or the fact that the user created the work.
2. Read `build/verification-report.json`. Community publication requires **verification PASS**. Any other verdict returns a HOLD.
3. Resolve the exact final HTML and GIF. Do not publish drafts, stills, evidence files, build reports, attachments, or unrelated files.
4. Collect publication metadata: title, author, author URL, description, language, story type, tags, date, plugin version, and license.
5. Obtain explicit **rights confirmation**. Do not infer ownership or redistribution rights.
6. Treat the **source prompt** as private by default. Include it only after a separate explicit yes to publishing the prompt itself.
7. Write the approved metadata input used by the deterministic preflight. Keep control fields such as prompt-consent flags outside the final public schema.
8. Prepare the contribution package with `scripts/demo_submit.py prepare`, for example:
```bash
python3 scripts/demo_submit.py prepare \
--build-dir build \
--stage-root build/community-submission \
--author <github-user> \
--slug <slug> \
--metadata build/community-demo.json
```
9. Validate the staged package with `scripts/demo_submit.py check`:
```bash
python3 scripts/demo_submit.py check build/community-submission/community/<github-user>/<slug>
```
10. Run the gallery validator against the contribution checkout before GitHub publication. The required gate is `scripts/demo_gallery.py check`; regenerate `demos/catalog.json` deterministically with `scripts/demo_gallery.py build` only after the three-file package is placed in the contribution checkout.
11. Confirm the contribution changes only `demos/community/<github-user>/<slug>/{demo.gif,index.html,demo.json}` plus the root generated `demos/catalog.json` when its content changes.
12. Delegate the validated contribution to `community-publisher`. That worker owns fork, branch, commit, push, and pull-request mechanics. It returns control to this parent workflow and never merges.
13. Return the PR URL, demo ID/path, validation summary, and the explicit reminder that maintainer manual review and merge are still required.
## HOLD conditions
Return HOLD instead of guessing or partially publishing when any of these is unresolved:
- explicit opt-in is missing
- final verification PASS is missing
- final GIF or HTML is missing, empty, or ambiguous
- rights confirmation is missing or false
- public metadata is incomplete
- secret, local-path, signed-URL, or unsafe remote-script findings appear in export preflight
- the destination demo already exists
- GitHub username cannot be resolved safely
- GitHub authentication cannot create/reuse a fork, push a fresh branch, or open a pull request
- the target upstream repository cannot be verified exactly
- deterministic catalog validation fails
A HOLD must state the blocking requirement. Never weaken export checks, publish extra files, or claim success without a returned PR URL.
## Related components
- routing authority: `helper/GUIDE.md`
- route registry: `helper/router.json`
- demo schema: `schemas/demo.schema.json`
- package preflight: `scripts/demo_submit.py`
- gallery validator: `scripts/demo_gallery.py`
- gallery index: `demos/catalog.json`
- publisher worker: `agents/community-publisher.md`
- final creation parent workflow: `skills/new-post/SKILL.md`
- artifact registry: `helper/artifacts.json`
## Research gates
`bounded-verification` remains the relevant research gate because a demo cannot cross this export boundary until the independent final verdict is PASS. Existing evidence and creative gates govern the artifact before publication; this workflow does not create new claims, redesign the post, or reinterpret evidence.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!