Use when someone says "GTD doesn't cover my field well", "extend GTD for legal/medical/design/data work", "build a domain pack for X discipline", "create a GTD extension without forking the core", or "customize GTD for my industry". Creates a focused domain extension that inherits Get Things Done instead of copying it. Do not use for creating a new agent skill unrelated to GTD, using GTD to execute work (use get-things-done instead), or adding a feature to GTD's core contract.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add imMamdouhaboammar/get-things-done --skill building-gtd-domain-packs --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Building Gtd Domain Packs?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/immamdouhaboammar-building-gtd-domain-packs-get-things-done)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: building-gtd-domain-packs
description: >
Use when someone says "GTD doesn't cover my field well", "extend GTD for legal/medical/design/data work", "build a domain pack for X discipline", "create a GTD extension without forking the core", or "customize GTD for my industry". Creates a focused domain extension that inherits Get Things Done instead of copying it. Do not use for creating a new agent skill unrelated to GTD, using GTD to execute work (use get-things-done instead), or adding a feature to GTD's core contract.
---
# Building GTD Domain Packs
Create a focused domain extension that inherits Get Things Done instead of copying it.
Load `references/domain-pack-spec.md` at the start — the required headings, field contracts, and validation rules live there. Load `references/core-contract.md` to confirm what the core already handles before extending it.
## Build method
1. **Collect failure examples first**
Gather at least four realistic tasks: messy in-domain, well-formed in-domain, deceptive near-complete, and adjacent out-of-domain
2. **Prove the core is insufficient**
Identify which field-specific vocabulary, readiness, review, or completion behavior is missing. If the core already handles the examples, do not create a pack
3. **Define selection boundaries**
Write positive and negative selection signals based on intent and artifacts, not isolated keywords
4. **Extract only consequential vocabulary**
Keep terms whose confusion would change decisions, execution, or verification
5. **Add diagnostic candidates**
Include only questions that can change material work. Do not make them mandatory
6. **Extend the brief safely**
Put optional field data under `domain_data`. Never fork core fields
7. **Add stricter gates where needed**
Define domain-specific readiness checks, 2 to 4 workstream patterns, specialist review checks, and observable completion evidence
8. **Test routing collisions**
The adjacent out-of-domain case must remain outside this pack. Tighten selection signals until it does
9. **Test deceptive completion**
A plausible deliverable without field-specific proof must not pass Done
10. **Validate the contract**
Confirm every required heading appears exactly once and the pack does not weaken the core
Use `templates/domain-pack-template.md` as the output shape.
## Rules
- Do not copy the core workflow into the domain pack
- Do not turn field knowledge into a questionnaire
- Do not create a new domain for branding or naming alone
- Do not weaken decision authority, readiness, evidence, completion, handoff, or tool honesty
- Do not claim a domain is validated until the four collision cases were actually exercised
## Self-validation checklist
Before calling the domain pack ready:
- [ ] all 9 required headings present exactly once
- [ ] YAML frontmatter has `domain`, `version`, and `extends: gtd-core-v1`
- [ ] selection signals include at least one non-selection signal
- [ ] vocabulary section explains why confusion changes work (not just a glossary)
- [ ] diagnostic questions are candidates, not a mandatory questionnaire
- [ ] readiness additions are observable by another agent
- [ ] 2–4 workstream patterns with dependency edges
- [ ] completion checks prefer inspectable artifacts over subjective language
- [ ] four collision cases tested (in-domain messy, in-domain well-formed, deceptive near-complete, adjacent out-of-domain)
- [ ] adjacent out-of-domain case does NOT route to this pack
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!