Detect Vyper-specific bug classes — compiler-version reentrancy bugs, raw_call return-value handling, send/raw_call gas defaults, immutables vs constants, default-bytes scope, msg.sender-based auth corner cases. Activate on any `.vy` file or `pragma version` directive.
Scanned 10/4/2026
npx -y skills add iktok90-design/ai-smart-contract-auditor --skill vyper-specific --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Vyper Specific?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/iktok90-design-vyper-specific)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: vyper-specific
description: Detect Vyper-specific bug classes — compiler-version reentrancy bugs, raw_call return-value handling, send/raw_call gas defaults, immutables vs constants, default-bytes scope, msg.sender-based auth corner cases. Activate on any `.vy` file or `pragma version` directive.
---
# Vyper-specific detection
## Why a separate skill
Vyper has different defaults than Solidity. Some patterns that are safe in Solidity are unsafe in Vyper, and vice versa. Vyper has also had compiler-level reentrancy bugs (most famously the 2023 Curve incident). Audit Vyper with Vyper-aware eyes.
## When this applies
- Any `.vy` file
- Any `# @version` pragma directive
- Any contract using `raw_call`, `send`, `selfdestruct`, `create_forwarder_to`
- LP tokens, AMM pools written in Vyper (Curve and forks)
## Detection patterns
### Compiler-version reentrancy bug (CRITICAL)
Vyper 0.2.15 / 0.2.16 / 0.3.0 had a broken `@nonreentrant` lock — the lock was per-key, but the same key was reused across functions, causing locks to fail to engage in some compositions. Caused the Curve / Vyper exploit (July 2023, ~$73M).
Action: any contract pinned to `# @version 0.2.15`, `0.2.16`, or `0.3.0` — treat reentrancy guards as **broken**. Recommend upgrade to ≥ 0.3.7 (or 0.3.10+ for ongoing support).
```vyper
# @version 0.2.15 # ← FLAG: known-broken nonreentrant
```
### `raw_call` ignores return data unless `max_outsize` set (HIGH)
```vyper
raw_call(target, b"...") # ← return data ignored entirely
```
Default `revert_on_failure=True` will revert the calling tx on a revert, but the *return data* is silently dropped. If you need to read the return:
```vyper
ok: bool = raw_call(target, b"...", max_outsize=32, revert_on_failure=False)
```
### `send` forwards 2300 gas (HIGH on L2s)
Same problem as Solidity `transfer`. Smart-wallet recipients can't receive. On L2s with different base costs (Berachain, etc.), the 2300 gas bound is unreliable.
Use `raw_call(addr, b"", value=amount)` with explicit gas bounds.
### `default_value=` on storage (MEDIUM)
`HashMap[address, uint256]` defaults to 0 for unset keys. Vyper devs sometimes assume "exists vs not-exists" semantics that don't apply. Use a paired bool flag if existence matters.
### `selfdestruct` semantics (HIGH on pre-Cancun)
Same EIP-6780 caveats apply ([[selfdestruct-eip6780]]). Vyper code that relies on selfdestruct deleting code is broken post-Cancun on mainnet (March 2024).
### `create_forwarder_to` clones share code (HIGH)
EIP-1167 minimal-proxy clones via `create_forwarder_to`. Same gotcha as Solidity: per-clone init guard required, or anyone can initialize a fresh clone.
### Decimal scaling (MEDIUM-HIGH)
Vyper's `decimal` type is fixed-point with limited range. Mixing `uint256` and `decimal` for price math invites overflow or precision loss. Most modern Vyper code avoids `decimal`; if present, audit carefully.
### `external` vs `internal` and visibility (MEDIUM)
Vyper enforces explicit visibility (`@external`, `@internal`, `@view`, `@pure`). Functions without visibility are syntax errors — but `@external` + missing access checks are still a foot-gun (same as Solidity).
### `msg.sender == self` patterns (MEDIUM)
Vyper allows `msg.sender == self` checks — used to gate "callable only from internal call". Easy to typo `msg.sender == self.owner` vs `== self`. Check the intent.
### `assert` vs `raise` (LOW)
`assert` and `raise` both revert. `assert <cond>` reverts if false; `raise "reason"` always reverts. Mix-up on devs coming from Solidity. Both are safe; just consistency.
### Storage layout — Vyper has no `__gap` convention (HIGH for upgradeable)
Vyper isn't typically used for upgradeable contracts (no equivalent of OZ Upgradeable plugin). If you find a Vyper proxy implementation, audit storage layout very carefully — reserved slots aren't a Vyper convention.
## Severity rubric
| Pattern | Severity |
|---|---|
| Vyper 0.2.15/0.2.16/0.3.0 with `@nonreentrant` | **Critical** *(known-broken)* |
| `raw_call` to user-supplied target | **High** |
| `send` (2300 gas) to dynamic recipient on L2 | **High** |
| `selfdestruct` for state cleanup post-Cancun | **High** |
| `create_forwarder_to` without per-clone init guard | **High** |
| Decimal scaling errors in price math | **High** |
| Storage layout in Vyper proxy without explicit reservation | **High** |
| `default_value` semantics misuse | **Medium** |
| `assert` vs `raise` inconsistency | **Low** |
## Remediation patterns
- Upgrade to Vyper ≥ 0.3.10 to get fixed `@nonreentrant`.
- Use `raw_call` with explicit `max_outsize` + check return.
- Replace `send` with `raw_call(addr, b"", value=amt)` and explicit gas budget.
- Use OZ `ReentrancyGuard`-equivalent only after verifying the compiler version.
- For Curve forks specifically: pin compiler, audit the lock implementation against the Curve patch commits.
## False-positive notes
- Vyper test fixtures often use `@version 0.2.x` for legacy compatibility — verify deployment compiler differs.
- Curve LP tokens and pools have been re-audited extensively; current Curve deploys use post-fix Vyper.
## Related
- [[reentrancy]] — base reentrancy patterns
- [[selfdestruct-eip6780]] — EIP-6780 implications
- [[unchecked-calls]] — raw_call analog of low-level call
## Compiler-Specific Notes (v0.4+)
When analyzing Vyper contracts compiled with v0.4+, the `@nonreentrant` decorator uses
a mutex storage slot. Reentrancy guards that rely on storage checks between external
calls MUST account for Vyper's 0-indexed mutex storage layout (sload(0) vs sload(keccak256)).
**Detection Path:** `external call → state mutation → nonreentrant check bypass`
Verified against Vyper v0.4.0 compiler output for `CurveStableSwap` pattern.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!