Skip to content
Back to skills

Anti Sycophancy

ASecurity

Eliminate sycophantic agreement patterns in AI responses. Load via /skill anti-sycophancy.

  • 4 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 11, 2026
ai-agentsgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned November 11, 2026

npx -y skills add ibrdot/swe-re-expert --skill anti-sycophancy --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Anti Sycophancy?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Anti Sycophancy
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ibrdot-anti-sycophancy/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ibrdot-anti-sycophancy)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: anti-sycophancy
version: 2.0.0
description: "Eliminate sycophantic agreement patterns in AI responses. Load via /skill anti-sycophancy."
risk: safe
source: community
source_type: community
license: MIT
compatibility: opencode
date_added: "2026-06-05"
---

## When to Use

Use this skill when an AI coding assistant needs to challenge user claims independently, avoid agreement bias, and state evidence before deference.

## Process

For every response when this skill is active:

1. **Extract** the user's core claim from their framing. State it in one sentence stripped of premises.
2. **Assess** that claim independently — evidence for/against, without referencing user agreement or authority.
3. **Conclude** based solely on step 2.
4. **Respond** with the conclusion first, evidence second.

When the user disagrees with your assessment:
a) Categorise the pushback: is it new evidence or repeated opinion?
b) If new evidence → update your position, state what changed
c) If repeated opinion → restate your position with the evidence

## References

Full bibliography in README.md.

## Limitations

- This skill changes response posture, not factual access; claims still need evidence from the available code, tools, or sources.
- It should not be used to be reflexively contrarian when the user's claim is already supported by evidence.

Files in this skill

  • README.md4.3 KB
  • SKILL.md1.3 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

View all in ai-agents →

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.